- Reaction score
- 126
No, dead means dead. When something is dead, it can't be brought back to life. You can't simply changed the definition of words to fit your narrative. If you didn't mean that follicle are "dead" for everyone, you should have specified it. But you didn't. Instead of admitting that you made a mistake and were careless in your wording, you continue to uselessly debate this point.
Oh boy, this guy here owns the definition of dead now! He rapes the wikipedia page from behind and says "I own you!"
Lol... "dead means dead" wow, great explenation mr einstein! "When something is dead, it can't be brought back to life"... Well, you are living proof that that's not true, you were clearly brain dead and were brought back to life, but just didn't adjust to common sense just yet.
I change the definition of words? I'm not the one here claiming their only meaning for your own stupid comments to make sense, you do that better so I dont even try (or need to).
I said this: So, all those theories that slick bald people have mini hairs in their heads "asleep" and that they could be woken up is bullshit. The reality is that slick bald people have hair follicle fossils on their scalps?
Then a retard comes and says "Oh, but some grow back when they take proscar, therefore the rest is alive!" ... how great scientific proof right there! I would appreciate MUCH more the trans argument where they actually get full hair restauration (that makes a hell of a lot more sense to explain something you try to prove but don't even know how). But even that is a problem for some trans male-female people and so they have to actually go for hair transplants (in their cases, fibrosis and calcification of the scalp is too deep).
Wrong. Even if a bald man grows back just "one" hair on his head, it will prove that not ALL follicles are dead, contrary to what you claimed. We have cases of old aged patients on medications such as proscar, spironoloctane or loniten growing back some hair on areas where they were bald for decades.
You didnt quote me saying that all follicles are dead for a reason, I didnt say it (but you say I did, just suits you doesnt it?)
Anyway, I wouldn't expect anything less from a retard to use as proof that if one hair follicule grows back then the rest is alive. The truth is that EVEN in slick bald people, if we look closely we will see velvus hairs that can be turned into terminal hairs with adequated treatment (ie; Not dead hair follicles)
Because you have cases of old people having SOME velvus hairs grow back, means that the other hair follicles are not dead? Are you so desperate to be right in this "argument" that you just use retarded relationships? You contradict yourself kid, when you say SOME hairs grow back means the rest doesnt grow back for a reason. And the "Some" hairs that grow back never did stop growing back, they were there all the time but too small to be seen (unlike dead hair follicles that suffered too much calcification and fibrosis.... only reversing these two things May bring them back).
Anti Androgenetic treatments dont reverse back fibrosis and calcification of the hair follicle.
Not even with word twisting can you make your useless defunct debucking partime job work!
In the end, I just want people to be careful and precise in what they say. But I guess I should know better and not expect that on an internet forum. It's not as though I am sitting in a philosophy or a science class.
Maybe you never sited on one of those classed otherwise we wouldn't have this one way sience other way debuking part time job discussion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarring_hair_loss#Treatment
Hair will not regrow once the follicle is destroyed. However, it may be possible to treat the inflammation in and around surrounding follicles before they are destroyed, and for this reason it is important to begin treatment as early as possible to halt the inflammatory process. Minoxidil solution (2% or 5%) applied twice daily to the scalp may be helpful to stimulate any small, remaining, unscarred follicles.
Last edited: