DHT is what triggers Androgenetic Alopecia, tests were done that proves it.
Really sensitivity to DHT, not DHT itself.
Saying that DHT causes hair loss is like saying that glucose causes cancer because cancer cells consume glucose. Yes they do, but so does nearly every other cell in the body.
Make your own theory on how a woman after receiving steroids developed male pattern baldness and not FPB.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_Krieger
Make your own theory on how a woman after receiving steroids developed male pattern baldness and not FPB.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_Krieger
DHT isn't the only thing in her body that changed and she might have been very sensitive to DHT.
Fact - DHT is the single most influential factor in male pattern baldness that we know of so far. Its also the only one we can change through a drug. Nothing else so far has any proof even remotely close that it can change or influence the final fate of male pattern baldness to any significant degree.
You can say factors a,b,c are involved with male pattern baldness, but you dont have proof of that. You also dont have proof it can change hair counts to the same degree as what propecia/dutasteride have proven. Its not a guess its proven out through many studies. You cant argue the importance of DHT anymore.
Fact - DHT is the single most influential factor in male pattern baldness that we know of so far. Its also the only one we can change through a drug. Nothing else so far has any proof even remotely close that it can change or influence the final fate of male pattern baldness to any significant degree.
You can say factors a,b,c are involved with male pattern baldness, but you dont have proof of that. You also dont have proof it can change hair counts to the same degree as what propecia/dutasteride have proven. Its not a guess its proven out through many studies. You cant argue the importance of DHT anymore.
DHT is like sugar for diabetics , because their pancreas is not producing enough insulin to balance sugar in their bodies, so they cut sugar and balance it with insulin injections, in male pattern baldness because something wrong with the folicle or the scalp DHT is damging the hair, people with full head of hair have the same levels of DHT and testostrone but it's not affecting their hair, like when you have histamine tolerance, when you eat certan food will cause you allergies, while people eating the same food and they do very well, genes are the main factors, if we knew how this genes affect hair folicles then the puzzle is solved.
interesting thoughts but please think about it:
Body hair needs DHT to grow, why are so different certains hair over scalp?
BTW the important androgens in hair cycle are produced inside the pilosebaceous unit.
Minoxidil also brings hair back, and has no effect on DHT.
Histogen is now in phase III trials, and they have no effect on DHT (that I know of).
Fact: Men with higher serum DHT levels are less likely to go bald:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.1330880106/abstract
Yet the absolute serum androgen concentrations in men with a disposition to balding is lower than in men with no reduction of scalp hair. The widespread assumption that androgen levels are in general elevated in bald-trait men must therefore be rejected.
DHT is like sugar for diabetics , because their pancreas is not producing enough insulin to balance sugar in their bodies, so they cut sugar and balance it with insulin injections, in male pattern baldness because something wrong with the follicle or the scalp DHT is damging the hair, people with full head of hair have the same levels of DHT and testostrone but it's not affecting their hair, like when you have histamine tolerance, when you eat certain food it will cause you allergies, while people eating the same food and they do very well, genes are the main factor, if we know how this genes affect hair follicles then the puzzle is solved.
Scalp hair has the opposite reaction to androgens compared to body hair.
Look how strongly beard & body hair respond to post-puberty androgens - that is how BAD those same androgens are for scalp hair.
Except it's not. The majority of the population's hair, on this planet at least, does not produce a negative effect when exposed to androgens.........You have to look past the very first thing you see and use some thought. It's not that simple.
One word, genes. DHT triggers hair loss, fact, what you're claiming is like saying fire kills trees so just put the fire out with water and expect it to regrow again. The conditions for it to happen just aren't there anymore.
One word, genes. DHT triggers hair loss, fact, what you're claiming is like saying fire kills trees so just put the fire out with water and expect it to regrow again. The conditions for it to happen just aren't there anymore.
I have noticed this slightly too, but i attribute it to my skin getting darker and it hides my white scalp more.Ironically, before even seeing this thread, I was thinking about Vitamin D playing a role in baldness today as I was soaking up sun today. Call me weird, but has anyone that is not completely bald notice how there hair feels after being out all day in the sun? My hair always feels thicker after being out all day, but maybe it's just me. I have always noticed this.
I honestly believe Vitamin D plays a role in thinning and balding. Just wish I had the smarts to figure it out and try something. Maybe I need to tan every weekend or something.
In your analogy, if dht starts the fire then people with male pattern baldness must have certain parts of their forest doused in varying levels of petrol that fuels this fire.