I live in germany and will try to join this trialHaarausfall - Dermatest
dermatest.com
Yep, its happening in Germany. It says "use the product 1x weekly", so it should be this treatment.
If this is easy to get from Korea I bet some of us here will be applying 2-3x per weekThis looks very promising. 83% efficacy of finasteride and they haven't even tried higher doses (with no adverse events). As always, we'll see.
Not something you want going systemic. I wouldn't apply more than the once a week that is recommended. Then again, the efficacy isn't all that great, so more frequent applications might not induce side effects?If this is easy to get from Korea I bet some of us here will be applying 2-3x per week
They did frequent applications without side effects but also without much efficacy as well. One bigger dose is better.Not something you want going systemic. I wouldn't apply more than the once a week that is recommended. Then again, the efficacy isn't all that great, so more frequent applications might not induce side effects?
The response rate is higher and there is more regrowth than in finasteride with alledgedly no side-effects.Not something you want going systemic. I wouldn't apply more than the once a week that is recommended. Then again, the efficacy isn't all that great, so more frequent applications might not induce side effects?
The rna vaccines are one of the most insane things to come out of modern science, period. The original vaccines were effective versus the variants that they were designed against. During delta and prior the split of hospitalizations for vaccinated vs. not was over 10/90.If that sh*t is as ineffective as the Covid-19 vaccines, that sounds promising... Lol.
It says 87% as effective as finasteride, but if this is true it would make finasteride basically irrelevant for most people.The response rate is higher and there is more regrowth than in finasteride with alledgedly no side-effects.
If the stated information is true, it would be superior to finasteride in every way.
You misread.The response rate is higher and there is more regrowth than in finasteride with alledgedly no side-effects.
If the stated information is true, it would be superior to finasteride in every way.
It says 87% as effective as finasteride, but if this is true it would make finasteride basically irrelevant for most people.
The "83% efficacy compared to finasteride" is from the study itself, not the fact sheet posted earlier. In the study, it was 24 weeks cosmerna compared to 24 weeks finasteride.On the fact sheet here, the regrowth per month was higher with this thing than in finasteride. The total regrowth was more for finasteride because they compared 4 months for this solution with 6 months of finasteride.
The "83% efficacy compared to finasteride" is from the study itself, not the fact sheet posted earlier. In the study, it was 24 weeks cosmerna compared to 24 weeks finasteride.
It's mostly for maintenance with a little regrowth.Good news based on their study, but the images aren't very impressive?
It's mostly for maintenance with a little regrowth.
Sideless maintenance + hair transplant = cureMaintenance is overrated though, especially in these short-term studies.
Some people more or less 'maintain' for 10 years with no treatment. If it can give at least 5% regrowth that would be something to talk about, so hopefully it delivers regrowth even if minor.