- Reaction score
- 1,709
Very good. And now all you needed to do was go ahead and cite FollicleThought, where you got the quotation fromBan me
The treatment involves extracting a small number of hair follicles from a person’s donor scalp area and then isolating two specific types of cells from the follicle – papilla cells and epidermal cells from the bulge region. These cells are then cultured, expanded, and combined to create a hair follicle “germ” or “follicular primordium.” Once the hair follicle germs are ready they are transported to a facility where they can be inserted back into a person’s scalp to grow hair.
I'm frustrated precisely because of the reasons I gave in the above post. If anything, your misinterpretation, or rather attempt at reinterpretation of where I am coming from, only prove my original points - you aren't listening to others, and you are obviously more interested in being perceived as correct, i.e. being egotistical. I literally mentioned both of those things in the other post. I cannot be any clearer.Ban me
And you're frustrated with me because you want to have a "meaningful conversation about the technology" your members were all giving out wrong information and I was proved correct two posts later, I see the same 3 or 4 people liking any post against me and disliking my posts too, I really don't give two shits if you want to get fed the wrong information.
"Your members" - these are not my members. They are independent people; I have no association with them other than the forum that we are all part of. And I'm not sure what you are talking about with being "proved correct." I have a problem with you making incorrect statements, especially given how frequently you post. I don't think I ever criticized you for anything you said correctly. It's just a matter of thinking before speaking - we are literally told this in real life since our youth; it's not an unreasonable or alien criticism.
"I really don't give two shits if you want to get fed the wrong information" How can you say that? How can you possibly think that this is what I would want when I very clearly said that the spreading of misinformation is the very thing that I have a problem with?
Or are you saying that, you, who has barely begun to suckle on the information regarding the state of the art in the hairloss field, have arrived to save us from the misinformation of others through your infallible discourse and shining acumen? Give me a break. I've been reading your posts. Regardless of whether you perceive yourself as correct, you aren't being technically rigorous and the quality of your explanations isn't up to snuff - I'm not really sure what there is to argue about here. It might be a difficult truth to swallow, but perhaps after a handful of people all independently give you such feedback, it is time to reevaluate.
Last edited: