Thanks so much Hellouser! awesome contributor!! did you get a feeling for how effective it might be at all? could this be a cure conceptually?
Also! http://replicel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/JETRO-Toronto-RepliCel-in-Japan-a-Case-Study.pdf
Page 24 shows how Japan is going to categorize Replice's treatment for a 'conditional' approval (likely will play a role). It's also likely that it'll be 'Class III' as in low-risk, so it should be fairly easy to give the green light, although because it's a 'cosmetic' condition, who knows how seriously they take.
- - - Updated - - -
It'd be a functional cure for sure. Man, I wish we could see the 6+ month results, I've actually been talking about them for a good number of years. They'd be far more telling than just the 6 month results.
In Replicel's latest newsletter Lee Buckler states that he still thinks that RCH-01 will hit the market in 2018 (in Japan).
Yeah, I saw that newsletter too, and it is definitly exciting that they building and investing so heavily for this product. However, I thought they were going to start trials "within weeks" back in November.
So the target of 2018 is far ahead and I believe there will be setbacks and delays as with any project or product. So maybe on the market 2020 in Japan if things goes fairly well.
This is what I don't understand about Replicel. In most interviews I've read, they paint themselves as an alternative to surgical procedures in the battle against hair loss. Yet the people who might consider getting a hair transplant don't really represent their market, do they? I mean, they're after new hair whereas Replicel has already made it more or less clear they can only offer maintenance.
So what's all that about? Is it just a clever marketing trick, trying to imply regrowth without actually having to claim responsibility for it, or what?
Maybe Shiseido started the Phase II trials in Japan?
No, they've made it clear that they're after reversal of hair loss, not maintenance.
Maybe... but RepliCel have been very much open and sharing information on any development with their products. I know Shiseido is a separate entity and may do things very differently, but why would RepliCel state that Shiseido will initiate trials in Q1 2016 if they had already started?
Anyways, I think it sounds promising that they are using money and resources as stated in the newsletter. Does indicate they are confident in their product/results.
- - - Updated - - -
I have ofte seen people refer to Replicels RCH-01 as a product for maintenance, but from video on their website it does seem they are aiming for regrowth AND maintenance.
Damn.. That would be really sweet. Hope they just manage to get good results, that's the most important part.