- Reaction score
- 743
That's because it allows extra absorption but there is no need to go beyond 0.5mm for this.
Ok so what about the people who do needling on its own and get all their hair hair back?
That's because it allows extra absorption but there is no need to go beyond 0.5mm for this.
There's been no one that has achieved this. Claims without proof are useless.So what about the people who get all their hair back needling with minoxidil?
Ok so what about the people who do needling on its own and get all their hair hair back?
Because needling just enhances the absorption of minoxidil.So what about the people who get all their hair back needling with minoxidil?
There's been no one that has achieved this. Claims without proof are useless.
Because needling just enhances the absorption of minoxidil.
Hmm..
Well you seem far more knowledgable than me so can’t really argue against your point but I do think you may be wrong
finasteride is poison.
Placebo-swayed individuals who lack basic self awareness. Surely not all, but most. None of this fear mongering about finasteride sides was happening until the advent of the internet hair forum. Everyone who took it prior to then knew there was a 2% chance of sexual issues, which really wasn't much more than the general population. But now we have idiots convinced that only 2% of those who take it DON'T get sides. Hell, there's a guy in the Sandalore thread convinced he got sexual sides from that FFS.I don’t understand this beef with finasteride. If you’re an adult capable of making informed decisions you understand it’s a calculated risk, a risk that should be weighed against one’s desire to maintain one’s hair.
well sandalore affects hormones. I think you have the self awareness thing backwardsPlacebo-swayed individuals who lack basic self awareness. Surely not all, but most. None of this fear mongering about finasteride sides was happening until the advent of the internet hair forum. Everyone who took it prior to then knew there was a 2% chance of sexual issues, which really wasn't much more than the general population. But now we have idiots convinced that only 2% of those who take it DON'T get sides. Hell, there's a guy in the Sandalore thread convinced he got sexual sides from that FFS.
IGF-1, sure, but if you're referring to sex hormones, please do tell. I must've missed it.well sandalore affects hormones. I think you have the self awareness thing backwards
I thought I read it affected testerone but it may have been something else, as I don't see that nowIGF-1, sure, but if you're referring to sex hormones, please do tell. I must've missed it.
Little antagonisitic there buddy, lack of relaxing neuropeptides from having no 5 alpha reductase?IGF-1, sure, but if you're referring to sex hormones, please do tell. I must've missed it.
Nothing testy about my reply. If you find something negative about Sandalore I'd surely like to see it.Little antagonisitic there buddy, lack of relaxing neuropeptides from having no 5 alpha reductase?
Rihgt I think it may have been sandalwood I heard about it. Nothing negative to say atmNothing testy about my reply. If you find something negative about Sandalore I'd surely like to see it.
Could be. I never bothered to look into actual sandalwood.Rihgt I think it may have been sandalwood I heard about it. Nothing negative to say atm
Placebo-swayed individuals who lack basic self awareness. Surely not all, but most. None of this fear mongering about finasteride sides was happening until the advent of the internet hair forum. Everyone who took it prior to then knew there was a 2% chance of sexual issues, which really wasn't much more than the general population. But now we have idiots convinced that only 2% of those who take it DON'T get sides. Hell, there's a guy in the Sandalore thread convinced he got sexual sides from that FFS.
I'm pretty wary of essential oils, so many are estrogenic. Not sure how sandalwood properties play into sandalore; possibly treat as an entirely seperate compoundCould be. I never bothered to look into actual sandalwood.