XO!Some people simply do not fit under the term 'old hag' - at any age
You'll be one of those people too, EL.
XO!Some people simply do not fit under the term 'old hag' - at any age
To use a well known example of what I mean, h.l. followed Fred around for a year, every single post by Fred got a reply from h.l. and he would bring up anything Fred had ever said and use it against him. He was obsessed with the idea that Fred was lying about his one night stands and tinder. It was ridiculous.
h.l. wasn't obsessed whatsoever.
He was doing a fine service for all of us posters who happen to question Fred's many outlandish claims regarding his lifestyle.
Fred is apparently goood looking and tall. Why would it be so hard to believe that? Not surprising at all tbh..
None of his claims were outlandish IMO. As you all remember I had my fun on Tinder last year and pretty much everything he said matched up with my own experiences, down to rotating many different women at once. I didn't do this myself to any significant extent but I met women who had experienced it, and it is apparently a Thing for guys to do on Tinder.h.l. wasn't obsessed whatsoever.
He was doing a fine service for all of us posters who happen to question Fred's many outlandish claims regarding his lifestyle.
None of his claims were outlandish IMO. As you all remember I had my fun on Tinder last year and pretty much everything he said matched up with my own experiences, down to rotating many different women at once. I didn't do this myself to any significant extent but I met women who had experienced it, and it is apparently a Thing for guys to do on Tinder.
Anyway, h.l. seems to have dropped it and I think we can all agree to let that hatchet remain buried.
There is nothing wrong with you looks-wise. I don't want to come across as dickish here but you seem to be in Impact largely to troll feebly for compliments, similar to Tellersquill back in the day. Either that or you have an absolutely awful personality IRL that only model-like looks could make up for.ITT: zircon and Fred are chad. News @ 11
Our experiences can't be like yours.
There is nothing wrong with you looks-wise. I don't want to come across as dickish here but you seem to be in Impact largely to troll feebly for compliments, similar to Tellersquill back in the day. Either that or you have an absolutely awful personality IRL that only model-like looks could make up for.
TBH tellersquill was different in that he supported the idea that hair loss (which he did not have) was not relevant for sexual attraction. Then he left this hair loss forum because "addictive".
Baldhurts says the exact opposite. Then again, they say opposites attract...
Early stage baldness doesn't really matter so long as you are okay looking. It is when you progress beyond the cliff that is NW3 that things take a turn for the worse.TBH tellersquill was different in that he supported the idea that hair loss (which he did not have) was not relevant for sexual attraction. Then he left this hair loss forum because "addictive".
Baldhurts says the exact opposite. Then again, they say opposites attract...
Tellersquill also had the behavioral cycle where he would post pictures of himself followed by people telling him he was good-looking, followed by him shrugging it off and posting even more. That's where I think they are similar.TBH tellersquill was different in that he supported the idea that hair loss (which he did not have) was not relevant for sexual attraction. Then he left this hair loss forum because "addictive".
Baldhurts says the exact opposite. Then again, they say opposites attract...
He just comes across as a classic "story teller." I knew many of these types of guys growing up.Fred is apparently goood looking and tall. Why would it be so hard to believe that? Not surprising at all tbh..
True. However, between the two. I like baldhurts's style better.Tellersquill also had the behavioral cycle where he would post pictures of himself followed by people telling him he was good-looking, followed by him shrugging it off and posting even more. That's where I think they are similar.
20.32 centimeters.True. However, between the two. I like baldhurts's style better.
For example, teller repeatedly mentioned women were missing out on him because of his 8 inch apparatus (I don't know what it is in centimeters but his enthusiasm suggested it must be a good quantity).
In case anybody is wondering if they're adequate or not,
The average size for a white man's penis is 8.4 inches, and it's 9.7 inches for a Black man's penis.
Both numbers refer to erect penises, with the measurements made in a 1992 study of men aged 25-34 commissioned by the National Institute of Health.
Those numbers seems to be too high compared to the other studies that are out there. Could you link to the study? From penissizes.org:In case anybody is wondering if they're adequate or not,
The average size for a white man's penis is 8.4 inches, and it's 9.7 inches for a Black man's penis.
Both numbers refer to erect penises, with the measurements made in a 1992 study of 69 men aged 25-34 commissioned by the National Institute of Health.
1992 study of cuckold p**rn right?In case anybody is wondering if they're adequate or not,
The average size for a white man's penis is 8.4 inches, and it's 9.7 inches for a Black man's penis.
Both numbers refer to erect penises, with the measurements made in a 1992 study of 69 men aged 25-34 commissioned by the National Institute of Health.