Tinder The Really Hard Truth About Girls

[CopeForLife]

They would be better under French and british rule

anglo saxon colonist in his best

 

[Michael84]

u probably just leave the cave or nuclear bunker
it isn't 70-s anymore
what country are u from?

Not me. It's Russians who have never left cave and their nuclear bunkers. I live in Ukraine and had to spend more than a year at war against those retards in the East of the country. I have some relatives living in Russia, many people I know are from there, and also I can read their news, TV shows and Internet webistes, forums, etc. All I can say that they are hostile towards many countries, including their neighbours like Ukraine, Baltic countries, except such socialistic shitholes like Venesuella, Cuba, North Korea, Belarus and some other territories who don't support America because the USA is the main enemy for them, even on the social level. I guess the only reason they didn't have any conflicts with Americans is because they are much weaker and they know it.

 

[CopeForLife]

Not me. It's Russians who have never left cave and their nuclear bunkers. I live in Ukraine and had to spend more than a year at war against those retards in the East of the country. I have some relatives living in Russia, many people I know are from there, and also I can read their news, TV shows and Internet webistes, forums, etc. All I can say that they are hostile towards many countries, including their neighbours like Ukraine, Baltic countries, except such socialistic shitholes like Venesuella, Cuba, North Korea, Belarus and some other territories who don't support America because the USA is the main enemy for them, even on the social level. I guess the only reason they didn't have any conflicts with Americans is because they are much weaker and they know it.

Those retards are your (ukrainian) citizens they just speak russian and do not want to be ukrainized. They didn't shell Kiev or Lviv like ukrainian army did in Donetsk, Luhansk and etc.

 

[Swoop]

@Michael84

Yes, because the USA is the holy one.

USA can't even respect international law and sovereignty. They handled lately many things in a childish non-diplomatic manner too.

USA should already accept that this isn't a unipolar world. Russia showed this in the Syrian conflict. USA just can't swallow this, they want sole supremacy.

Geostrategic balance of power avoids major global conflicts. But as far as I am aware NATO buildup is still heavily increasing on the eastern front close to Russian borders. Tons of heavy military equipment this week was imported into Europe which included hundreds of tanks.

Who is the aggressive party here? Ahh yes, Russia off course!

You are not biased, you are a lunatic. Just lol @ calling for war with Russia. Absolutely insane.

Then again you referred to McCain, says enough to me.

I hope USA and Russia will have a great f*cking relationship under Trump presidency .

 

[Michael84]

Those retards are your (ukrainian) citizens they just speak russian and do not want to be ukrainized. They didn't shell Kiev or Lviv like ukrainian army did in Donetsk, Luhansk and etc.

I had many people in my batallion from Donetsk and other occupied regions who spoke Russian and still wanted to kill all those scums who occupied their land. Besides we are not speaking about ukrainians, we are speaking about russian mercenaries, regular troops and tons of weapons that they send to the terrorists to support them. They officially deny it but even pro-russian people don't deny that it all comes from Mordor.

 

[CopeForLife]

@Michael84

Yes, because the USA is the holy one.

USA can't even respect international law and sovereignty. They handled lately many things in a childish non-diplomatic manner too.

USA should already accept that this isn't a unipolar world. Russia showed this in the Syrian conflict. USA just can't swallow this, they want sole supremacy.

Geostrategic balance of power avoids major global conflicts. But as far as I am aware NATO buildup is still heavily increasing on the eastern front close to Russian borders including tons of heavy military equipment this week which included hundreds of tanks.

Who is the aggressive party here? Ahh yes, Russia off course!

You are not biased, you are a lunatic. Just lol @ calling for war with Russia. Absolutely insane.

I hope USA and Russia will have a great f*cking relationship under Trump presidency .

I still believe that Syria was a bait.

USA knows on his skin what does it means to patronize an Middle East sh*t hole like Syria or Iraq with degraded economy and non-loyal local population.

Yes, Russia won in Syria in 2016 but it cost A LOT. See what happens in 2017.

 

[CopeForLife]

I had many people in my batallion from Donetsk and other occupied regions who spoke Russian and still wanted to kill all those scums who occupied their land. Besides we are not speaking about ukrainians, we are speaking about russian mercenaries, regular troops and tons of weapons that they send to the terrorists to support them. They officially deny it but even pro-russian people don't deny that it all comes from Mordor.

There were exactly two interventions by russian army (successful) – in 2014 in Ilovaisk and 2015 in Debaltsevo.

Others "mercenaries" were only Ukraine official's imagination.

 

[tellersquill]

It's because women usually have no incentive to accomplish great things in life: like making good movies or becoming a political figure.

Unless they're ugly.

Women who are decent-looking to hot don't do these things because they just don't have to.

No one is keeping any woman from achieving her dreams, at least in the West.

Haha you are such a sh*t.

I actually think I would like you in real life because you say sh*t (even if its sometimes wrong) that is just so taboo.

 

[Michael84]

There were exactly two interventions by russian army (successful) – in 2014 in Ilovaisk and 2015 in Debaltsevo.
Others "mercenaries" were only Ukraine official's imagination.

Oh, that is a different matter then. Only two times. I guess that makes Russia innocent. Why do you blame our army for killing civilians then? It was just a few times when we killed just a few thousands of them. What's the deal? And even then it's much less then the casualties that Russia did attacking Aleppo in Syria or Grozniy in 1990s when poor Chechen volunteers wanted to gain independence of the Kremlin junta but the Russian army didn't leave a single undamaged building in the city.

 

[SmoothSailing]

It's because women usually have no incentive to accomplish great things in life: like making good movies or becoming a political figure.

Unless they're ugly.

Women who are decent-looking to hot don't do these things because they just don't have to.

No one is keeping any woman from achieving her dreams, at least in the West.

It's about choices.

It would be easy for someone to point at electrical engineers and say "there's a huge gender bias towards men, there must be hurdles in the way for women." But it would be completely and utterly untrue. Since I started college and right through to where I'm currently employed there have been serious initiatives to try and get more women to partake. My boss is ever trying to hire more women with the current ratio being 15 guys to one girl.

It won't work, it's no ones fault, women just choose not to do electrical engineering, probably for a multitude of reasons, one likely being they have less incentive to make serious money.

Statistics don't need to be balanced. It's entirely possible, with everyone being treated equally, that there are fewer female politicians, or fewer male teachers etc.

 

[Dench57]

It's because women usually have no incentive to accomplish great things in life: like making good movies or becoming a political figure.

Unless they're ugly.

Women who are decent-looking to hot don't do these things because they just don't have to.

No one is keeping any woman from achieving her dreams, at least in the West.

exactly

cooking, childbearing, and cleaning the house for when the man returns from work

women should be seen and not heard

 

[hairblues]

It's much more easier for (pretty) women to get a (high-paying) job.

I see it all the time since I've graduated.

Some very pretty girls who have graduated with me are already manager in their companies.

That's some BS right there. They got where they are by their looks and because they're women.

One of them is even working at my company and from the complaints I hear, she's not even competent.

But hey she's a 7/10 and she has a master's degree so...

The truly pretty girls get higher even faster, their LinkedIn profile usually go like this:

2010-2012: several jobs as a hostess

2015: master's degree in communication

2015: communication manager at well-known company

2016: head of communication

Must be because she's that good and worked hard to get there. Yeah right.

In the meantime, the guys that graduated at the same time are either unemployed or holding temporary positions forever.

Yeah for someone who got his masters in politics you use a lot of personal anecdotes to express your pov.

In my industry unless you are 'talent' no one gives a f*** how cute you are week 2.

It becomes like f*****g survivor.

No one looks good male or female and we all kind of smell a little ripe.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

It's well known that better looking people get career advantages.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Prior to this thread I hadn't realized how informed @CopeForLife and @Swoop are.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Yeah for someone who got his masters in politics you use a lot of personal anecdotes to express your pov.

In my industry unless you are 'talent' no one gives a f*** how cute you are week 2.

It becomes like f*****g survivor.

No one looks good male or female and we all kind of smell a little ripe.

Don't you work in the American film industry?

Lots of people there get promoted off favouritism, either due to looks or other factors.

Jon Peters says hello.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Nah it's people who have talent and work their asses off that will reap the most rewards in their career.

Are there still people who believe this?

Work is a social activity for most people, it's both social and economic so all factors matter.

Goldman Sachs Elevator Blog had a good quote on this. If you're a male intern on Wall Street -- you're simply not competing with the beautiful female interns. They will get the jobs if they're any good, there's nothing you can do about it.

I suspect @hairblues works hard and well and is rewarded as such. But if she were ugly it might not have been enough. Plus, the fact that everybody would have been meaner to hair would have imposed a burden on her that would have accumulated over time, draining her self esteem and thus work ethic. If people are constantly denigrating you, undermining you, stealing your ideas, if you're never invited for happy hour ... The pain adds up.

When you work in a group setting you are contributing social utility. If you're beautiful or otherwise advantages, for example your dad is important, you can be average. The rest of us need to work.

Some industries are more merit based than others, for example in professional sports your renumeration is primarily due to your production, not your looks. That's kind of ironic.

ETA: Autocorrect did a number on my post lol.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

ADAM WALINSKY, who was a speechwriter for the Kennedy brothers in the 1960s, endorsed Trump for president. The basis of that endorsement was that Hillary Clinton would pursue military confrontation with Russia. It's a long, well-written, detailed endorsement in case anybody is interested in the issues brought up earlier.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/rfk-trump-2016-democratic-party-speechwriter-214270

I was a Democrat all my life. I came to Washington to serve President John Kennedy and Attorney General Robert Kennedy. When the president was murdered and his brother struck off on his own, I joined his Senate campaign and staff as his legislative assistant and speechwriter, until his presidential campaign ended with his own assassination. I ran on a (losing) Democratic ticket in the New York state elections of 1970. When I was working to enact my own program of police reform in the 1980s and 1990s, then-Governor Bill Clinton was chairman of my National Committee for the Police Corps.

This year, I will vote to elect Donald Trump as president of the United States.

In general, these concerns were not widely discussed in mainstream corporate media, such as the Washington Post. They did show up a lot in the alt-left and alt-right media.

 

[nameless]

American
No Ukrainian heritage
Gets info from the Internet
Takes sides based on what he read on the Internet
Hates Russians because he read Russians do mean things, on the Internet
Cherry-picks articles. From the Internet

You Americans are beyond mental retardation.

FU dude.

I know how to weed out the bad news sources, which means I sh*t-can RT.

I gather that you're some Russian stooge.

Which country do you reside?

 

[hairblues]

ADAM WALINSKY, who was a speechwriter for the Kennedy brothers in the 1960s, endorsed Trump for president. The basis of that endorsement was that Hillary Clinton would pursue military confrontation with Russia. It's a long, well-written, detailed endorsement in case anybody is interested in the issues brought up earlier.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/rfk-trump-2016-democratic-party-speechwriter-214270



In general, these concerns were not widely discussed in mainstream corporate media, such as the Washington Post. They did show up a lot in the alt-left and alt-right media.

Okay but here is my take even if its true that Hillary is 'hawkish" which i dont agree with 100% (keep in mind I was a Bernie Bro) I dont really accept the reasoning to choose Trump over Hillary for fear of war---i think this man is going to get us into many wars all due to his personality disorder...I think he does not 'want' war but i believe from his Twitter--he is way too easily engaged in battles of the ego and he is going to be tempted to get into wars when things dont go his way.

I will say it again--i hope they find a way to impeach him and make Mike Pence president someone who will be much worse for domestic policy but will not get us into more messes internationally.

Trump to me is like not a logical choice if he were in a nomination against anyone.

I would have voted for Kim Kardashian over Donald Trump===maybe its because i am from NY and i have been privy to his craziness for probably 30 years...I 'know' all this sh*t about Donald Trump going way back..and the man is not rational.

He is the most easiest baited man and he does not see reason when his ego is engaged...i dont really know of any leader in US history as bad as that...I would take RICHARD NIXON over Trump.


ALL THAT being said i totally understand a foreign perspective on Trump from another angle...I just dont agree with it and i have 30 years of reading hearing stories locally to know the man is not normal.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Well its complicated to be honest because you have many different areas, departments and regions.

So for the high up producers in the ivory towers and the corporate end of the industry?--sure I'm sure that goes on.

I dont really want to get into it with you guys because no offense you seem to think you know it all so its a bit draining.

I work in several aspects depending on the job but I work mostly in a creative capacity as a department head (not an actor) i have to 'show' my work to get the job...my work has to speak for itself...if i am not good at my job basically it fucks with a $10 million dollar or more project...
My reputation in my field of course is important--i have many contacts...no one is doing me a favor...people refer me because they worked with me and like me and like my work and my personality--because they are usually hiring me to be a department head of one of two departments and if you dont have the personality to be a department head it matters.
Sometimes I go to work as a 'second' in the same department for another person who is department head--this is where its more 'who you know' when crewing up departments.

If i were 'ugly' would i still be working? I dont know to be honest i have worked with some ugly mother-fuckers both men and women.

I worked in music before film and there i worked more in a way of rubbing elbows with corporates but to be honest my looks really worked with dealign with venues where i was trying to get my artists to play...yes. Both my looks and my style helped there tremendously..also working to get press--my looks helped tremendously to get me in doors to schmooze with people.

Film? meh not so much sometimes maybe but i think one time it defeinlyte worked against me a female director who was fat and unattractive and DEFINITELY a f**-hag (which dont get me wrong i have gay friends but I am not a f**-hag who is in love with gay men) I felt like she was not even looking at my work and giving me fake smile whole time..and i just 'knew' she was probably holding out for a gay-boy to hire because she was a total theater b**ch director turned film director. Film and theater just night and day.

Thanks for sharing.

Most of what you posted is consistent with what I wrote. There are times in your life where your looks helped, other times it didn't. In some sectors of your industry it helps more than in others.

The experience you had in music very plausibly helped with your self-confidence, skills, connections, et cetera and contributed to you getting into film and succeeding at it.

You did add that some older women can be hostile to younger, more attractive women and create professional problems for them. That's true. I've heard of similar situations from other people, so it's probably common.

I dont really want to get into it with you guys because no offense you seem to think you know it all so its a bit draining.

I make an effort to be specific in my posts so as not to go beyond my area of knowledge.