Tinder The Really Hard Truth About Girls
- Thread starter N003
- Start date
It seems like such a small request, doesn't it?
- Reaction score
- 8,866
- Reaction score
- 62
SMH, You are very misinformed. You live in a matrix.- Obama was the worst POTUS in decades. In combination with Clinton as Secretary OS its a miracle we're all still alive.
Burp.
This shows you can't debate issues so you resort to personal attacks.
Last edited:
I disagree.
And I know it doesn't matter to you but most Americans agree with ME:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx
This means that only a smaller amount of Americans agree with you.
- Reaction score
- 11,938
@nameless, I feel a little sorry for you now. A lot of people are ganging up on you, it might be unnerving. I'm going to try and give some constructive criticism, without malicious intent. This is overall a supportive site, we don't need to have lots of flame wars. This isn't a complete list of advice, but it would be a good start.
1) Try sticking to one idea per thread at a time.
Instead of posting five or six consecutive, unanswered, rambling, incoherent posts, try just posting a single post making a single point. That way it will be easier for other people to read, and people will be more interested in reading them.
You might reject this on the basis that you believe that you should respond to every single "incorrect" point made. However, you will be a more effective communicative if you present a single point competently than if you present ten unrelated points incompetently.
2) Relax on the insults.
This is generally a supportive web site, in spite of everybody being so cynical. We're here to help each other. Further, most people are casual readers so they're not following threads in details. They have not read every post leading up to your post, they don't know the context. As such, when you pile on the attacks on myself, @CopeForLife, etc you risk coming off as a source of angry noise to other readers. Attack the idea, not the person.
The thread isn't just you and the person you're attacking, it's you, that person, and the 30 people reading it who might have something to contribute. When those 30 people come in, without having memorized the context of all previous posts as you have, and see a ping pong match of incoherent insults, they're not going to be impressed unless you're *very* funny.
1) Try sticking to one idea per thread at a time.
Instead of posting five or six consecutive, unanswered, rambling, incoherent posts, try just posting a single post making a single point. That way it will be easier for other people to read, and people will be more interested in reading them.
You might reject this on the basis that you believe that you should respond to every single "incorrect" point made. However, you will be a more effective communicative if you present a single point competently than if you present ten unrelated points incompetently.
2) Relax on the insults.
This is generally a supportive web site, in spite of everybody being so cynical. We're here to help each other. Further, most people are casual readers so they're not following threads in details. They have not read every post leading up to your post, they don't know the context. As such, when you pile on the attacks on myself, @CopeForLife, etc you risk coming off as a source of angry noise to other readers. Attack the idea, not the person.
The thread isn't just you and the person you're attacking, it's you, that person, and the 30 people reading it who might have something to contribute. When those 30 people come in, without having memorized the context of all previous posts as you have, and see a ping pong match of incoherent insults, they're not going to be impressed unless you're *very* funny.
- Reaction score
- 62
gallup?? Well, its the same analytics company who predicted Clinton's victory. I glimpsed through your earlier posts. You have very twisted understanding of global politics. But its not your fault buddy.. Mass media is out of control lately..
Points taken. Some good advice there.
And there are some issues I would raise:
Just to let you know I have not been trying to be funny at all. IMO these political debates are actually serious.
And your post shows that you have a good understanding of the dynamics of appearances in these discussions, which goes to my previous point about you being well-written, which helps you to window dress your bad substance with good style.
While I agree with some of what you've said in your above post, I must be missing something because you talk about me insulting you and I don't see where I've insulted you much, if at all. I think I've simply responded to the issues you've raised. Keep in mind that politics is tough so maybe you mistake tough-talk for insults.
For example, when I ask you to explain what you mean when you say Obama "ruined" the economy that is not an insult. I'm merely asking you to explain you position that Obama "ruined" the economy when the economy isn't even ruined. Why would you feel insulted by me asking what you mean when you say Obama "ruined" the economy?
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 62
I don't hate Mr. Barack Hussein Obama but I do dislike for what he represents and that is corporate elite interests. I'm all in for democracy and anti- oligarchy which you currently have in USA and which needs to end.-
Trump IS an oligarch. He is not going to destroy the oligarch system in America because that would eliminate the privilege that he himself gets from it. Trump likes his privilege. Obama is far from perfect, and if you look over my posts you'll see that I've complained about some things Obama has done. But I still believe that he has more care for the little guy in his pinky finger than Trump has in his whole body. And Clinton would have been harder on the oligarchs than Trump will be.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 62
You don't understand. I'm not pro-Trump.. but I do admit; it was a better choice than Clinton.
If that were totally true you would have the most important point
But he inherited some of it too, which is almost the same as earning it, so I can't fault him for inheriting money.
But he got some of it by cheating people. He has short-changed people of all classes - the rich, the poor, the middle class, many people in all categories have had to take Trump to court to get their just payments from him. He just settled the case against him for his phony Trump University crap. He paid his victims a lot of money to get them to go away. There's a lot of this type of stuff in his background.
And while he won't show his tax returns it is public knowledge that he's gotten out of paying hundreds of millions of dollar in taxes by claiming losses that other people suffered because of HIS business failures. Somehow he lost other people's money and he got those people to let him claim their losses in exchange for them getting to cut ties with him. They wanted him out of their lives so bad they allowed HIM to write-off hundreds of millions of dollars in THEIR losses to sever ties with him. It appears that it was legal at the time but it was scammy. And today it is illegal.
Last edited:
I wonder if you will say that if he starts a war with China. He is blustering China quite a bit. And even though Trump is kissing Russia's *** today, he's still unstable and unpredictable so he could change course and get tough with Russia down the road some months into office. And when he gets mad he could do anything whereas Clinton is much more rational.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 1,773
Nothing with that. They probably give good blow jobs.
It will give them practice. That way, they can screw in light bulbs.
- Reaction score
- 62
I disagree- IMO, he is very intelligent with a tactical mind. Don't take election rhetoric too seriously... actually i was impressed how he played mass media into his advantage. Clinton sank almost 1B$. Anyways... I would be much more worried if Clinton won.
I will agree that he's intelligent.
Let's let some time go by and see how this plays out with some time. Let's talk about which is more dangerous in say 6 months. That should give us some time to see how he acts in the White House.
- Reaction score
- 1,773
Even FOX news (Republican sponsered TV) predicted she would win.
Politics plays into everything.
Here's the FACTS:
1. FBI - Email investigation REOPENED after it was closed in July. One week
before election.
Coincedence? I don't think so.
2. Trump has always been critical of every president. Even George W Bush. However,
there's one key difference with Obama.
Trump said, for quite some time, that Obama was NOT A US Citizen (not born in US).
Again, bullshit. Complete total bullshit.
It would be one thing for him to criticize Obama on his policies (it's his right to voice
Trump's opinion. US is a free speech country).
But to make up bullshit?
3. Trump was endorsed by the LEADER of a white power organization (Klu Klux
Klan). He made no secret of the fact. They hate Jews and any race other than
white (blacks).
Until he won the election, he didn't DENY their support, or DENOUNCE them.
Why do you think that is? In fact, his son Eric, spoke on his behalf AFTER he was elected.
Who would want their votes? Maybe he's on the same page? Who knows.