were they in Star Wars?
Are you kidding me? They were in Star Trek.
were they in Star Wars?
Are you kidding me? They were in Star Trek.
I can't tell if you're serious in arguing that female heads of state would be less aggressive.
Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state was one of the most belligerent in history, and she ran on a war platform. She was likely the first Democratic candidate to sweep the neocon faction. Robert Kagan was gushing with praise for Hillary"s militarism.
Women are just as vicious as men, sometimes more so.
Sure, I do think there would be less genocide, world war, mass killing with more female heads of state. It doesn't mean that EVERY female head of state would be anti-war, so no I was not serious in saying that we should only have female leaders. Of course there are plenty of peaceful male leaders, the majority are. But yes I'd like to see more women leading countries for sure. I don't think women are just as vicious as men, generally. If that's the case then why are the overwhelming majority of murderers men, and virtually no mass-murderers women? It's not because they men are physically stronger, as most murders are carried out with firearms.
It's due to history, men were better able to fight wars due to natural size.
Modern warfare fought from behind a computer.
Keeping women down from what darling? Working in a coal mine?
Men are more violent than women. You said more cruel which I don't think men are.
Some women can be so cruel you will wish they had murdered you instead.
Yep, there were no women in the Russian army during World War II.
Don't underestimate women's capacity for violence and cruelty, they're right up there with men.
Women do not make good natural leaders, just like men don't make good natural primary caregivers.
Angela Merkel pretty much runs Germany (and Europe to an extent). Well, that's going pretty well so far.
Margaret Thatcher.
? I'm not talking about history. I'm talking about the world, today, in society. The overwhelming majority of murders are carried out by men, with firearms.
Men are more violent than women but women are more manipulative than me. It is my experience that men are simple minded creatures, and women are a bit more complex. Of course generally speaking, I know there are exceptions.Some women can be so cruel you wish they had murdered you instead.
Golda was the sh*t when i was a child. No one fucked with her if i remember correctly.
Men are more violent than women but women are more manipulative than me. It is my experience that men are simple minded creatures, and women are a bit more complex.
This is true but I do feel defensive over the millennials, because even though I'm not that young, I am still class as one as I was still a child before the year 2000 (15).I dont know if that is true to be honest.
In my profession the person who actually runs the 'sets' is the Assistant Director.
A lot of really fantastic assistant directors I have worked with have been women.
I think it is more about training and personality. Who handed them the tool set they need to be efficient.
I think men and women have different set of strengths and weaknesses.
I think the most effective leaders in my experience adjust themselves to the person they are in charge of to get the optimal production and efficiency out of their team.
I worked as a department head very often, in past I have put together teams anywhere from 2 to 20 people under me depending on size of the job.
men and women process information slightly different and if you are an effective leader what you do is adjust how best to get optimal results out of the people...you don't use one style for ALL your people across board.
To be honest educated vs uneducated people process information differently as well it is not just gender. Many things come into play.
Some people over-think or over-analyze sh*t and some are just hustlers who know how to get sh*t done in spite of obstacles.
The biggest difference I ever noticed is within age groups..the 20 something are not as not as efficient as the 20 somethings 10 years ago in my profession.
male or female. Generally speaking some are fantastic of course.
It is not even a bad thing to be honest you just have to train them in a more direct way.
They need more specific directions vs people in past.
(did i just trigger all the 20 year olds LOl sorry just being honest)
Pretty much. She was even on the more progress
LOL "Angela Merkal is a female who is a leader- all female leaders are sh*t" I didn't know we had such great minds floating around here. @WhitePolarBear
Next comment: "Indira Gandhi was killed when she was a leader- shows how good she was".
There was another women they assassinated a few years ago Beto (?) its terrible I am blanking out I think it was within past 8 years or so..it was really sad when it happened.
This is true but I do feel defensive over the millennials, because even though I'm not that young, I am still class as one as I was still a child before the year 2000 (15).
I think millennials aren't so good at old fashioned practical skills and we don't mature as quickly, but overall we do have many positive things going for us. We are less likely to be so wage focussed, we are more likely to be creative, we try to consumer more ethically (look at those vegan wankers), and we are more likely to question a lot of the bulshit going on around us.
Having said all that, I imagine that the most of millennials will be similar to the generation x's when they are older, but it will take longer for them to get there.