Woman Cancels $30,000 Wedding For Mysterious Reasons

[hairblues]

exactly, that's what i find not pure.
a short man is a turnoff for women, but a shot girl is not a turnoff for men.
women mate higher, men mate mostly with their lookmatches.


[/MEDIA]

Not really if anything men avoid women taller than them

I had a man actually say this to me once

So its a polar opposite thing for men and women...its not a one gender is going for looks matched and the other is going for higher status genes.

You are equating a taller man with a taller woman i society as equally valuable..
If anything a woman's height often can work against her with men.

So your point again to me is not logical assumption this is a inference of women looking for out of their station.

IMO there are so many better examples than using height--you actually weaken your argument using height as the thing that women are punching above and men are looking for matched.

 

[sunchyme1]

I'm 6', my dad is 6'4. My genetics fucked me, baldness from dads side of family, skin from mothers, height from mothers, frame from mothers. If I got my dads height, coloring and frame then hair from my mothers side I would never have came to this forum. My uncles and grandparents on mothers side all full heads in their f*****g 70s and 50s..... FUUUUUUCK!!

how tall is your mum?

4 inches is quite a difference. f*** me. still 6 foot is the perfect height. id love to be that tall

i feel the same with my genes. love to have my dads height and hair and frame. but my mums very pretty so i at least got something good from her lol

 

[Min0]

Not really if anything men avoid women taller than them

I had a man actually say this to me once

So its a polar opposite thing for men and women...its not a one gender is going for looks matched and the other is going for higher status genes.

You are equating a taller man with a taller woman i society as equally valuable..
If anything a woman's height often can work against her with men.

So your point again to me is not logical assumption this is a inference of women looking for out of their station.

IMO there are so many better examples than using height--you actually weaken your argument using height as the thing that women are punching above and men are looking for matched.

whatever you get the idea.

 

[DoctorHouse]

how tall is your mum?

4 inches is quite a difference. f*** me. still 6 foot is the perfect height. id love to be that tall

i feel the same with my genes. love to have my dads height and hair and frame. but my mums very pretty so i at least got something good from her lol

If you were 6ft you would want to be taller. I was over 6ft and still wanted to be alot taller still do.

 

[sunchyme1]

If you were 6ft you would want to be taller. I was over 6ft and still wanted to be alot taller still do.

maybe but i think 6 foot is pretty much universally accepted to be a great height. anything taller is a bonus. any shorter is bullshit.

 

[hairblues]

whatever you get the idea.

LOL not really that is my point...you brought in a forced perspective that had nothing to do with the subject at hand and you tried to force it to 'fit' in instead of just addressing the subject at hand...I think it shows how you are very indoctrinated with a specific philosophy (like people with fanaticism about religion lets say) and cant address anything without dragging this view point into the mix.

 

[hairblues]

If you were 6ft you would want to be taller. I was over 6ft and still wanted to be alot taller still do.

Really? My cousin is 6/5 I think and he always complained about being tall bumping his head etc.

 

[DoctorHouse]

Really? My cousin is 6/5 I think and he always complained about being tall bumping his head etc.

I guess 6ft 3 would be the perfect height for me. I see the new generation is getting taller now and the average height will eventually be 6ft. I know in the Netherlands that is the average height of men.

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

how tall is your mum?

4 inches is quite a difference. f*** me. still 6 foot is the perfect height. id love to be that tall

i feel the same with my genes. love to have my dads height and hair and frame. but my mums very pretty so i at least got something good from her lol

Victim of the fact that short pale ginger girls are considered cute, the male version would be INCEL. Depresses me to think of how different my life would have been with a different variation of my families DNA.

I guess 6ft 3 would be the perfect height for me. I see the new generation is getting taller now and the average height will eventually be 6ft. I know in the Netherlands that is the average height of men.

6ft is already average among young men in Scandinavia.

 

[Min0]

LOL not really that is my point...you brought in a forced perspective that had nothing to do with the subject at hand and you tried to force it to 'fit' in instead of just addressing the subject at hand...I think it shows how you are very indoctrinated with a specific philosophy (like people with fanaticism about religion lets say) and cant address anything without dragging this view point into the mix.

my point is very simple. men love their lookmatches, sometimes even if they have the option to get top tier models. (see bill gates)
women mate with men who are higher than them. (taller, richer etc).

 

[hairblues]

my point is very simple. men love their lookmatches, sometimes even if they have the option to get top tier models. (see bill gates)
women mate with men who are higher than them. (taller, richer etc).

Okay but let me reiterate...it had NOHTING to do with my quote to Xander. It's like irrelevant to what we were discussing and took us on this side bar journey.

 

[Min0]

Okay but let me reiterate...it had NOHTING to do with my quote to Xander. It's like irrelevant to what we were discussing and took us on this side bar journey.

i just wanted to point out that what he was saying about men wanting lookmatches is not far from the truth.
then it's only logical to talk about the other sex mating preferences compared to us.

 

[IggyPop]

my point is very simple. men love their lookmatches, sometimes even if they have the option to get top tier models. (see bill gates)
women mate with men who are higher than them. (taller, richer etc).

Height says nothing about a woman´s physical attractiveness. It might even be a disadvantage because a tall woman sometimes appears a bit masculine, particularly if she is overweight or ugly.

 

[hairblues]

Height says nothing about a woman´s physical attractiveness. It might even be a disadvantage because a tall woman sometimes appears a bit masculine, particularly if she is overweight or ugly.

I dated a guy that with heels i was taller than him--he said to me once he feels uncomfortable in public that I appeared taller than him with my shoes. I think we were close to same height barefoot. So even just boots that had a 3 inch heel i was taller than him.

I think most of the women he dated were very petite. He prefer this...so I just dont agree the height is more than a sexually (women preferring a man larger to feel protected, and a man preferring a woman small to feel dominate) i dont equate this with punching above ones status so to speak.

 

[Min0]

Height says nothing about a woman´s physical attractiveness. It might even be a disadvantage because a tall woman sometimes appears a bit masculine, particularly if she is overweight or ugly.

you know that models have to be tall right ? look at victoria secret models and point out the womanlet there if you can.
if a manlet is bad, a womanlet should not get away with it.

 

[IggyPop]

you know that models have to be tall right ? look at victoria secret models and point out the womanlet there if you can.
if a manlet is bad, a womanlet should not get away with it.

I know that models have to be tall, that´s why I added that only tall women who are overweight and/or ugly appear a bit masculine. It is just that I think being a womanlet isn´t really a disadvantage, unlinke being a manlet.

 

[hairblues]

I know that models have to be tall, that´s why I added that only tall women who are overweight and/or ugly appear a bit masculine. It is just that I think being a womanlet isn´t really a disadvantage, unlinke being a manlet.

Models have to be tall not for men but for the clothes--clohtes drape better on tall frames.
They look better coming down run way.

Swimsuit models are not tall or pinup girls are not tall a lot of them are more petite.

he is stretching his theory--this is what I do not like debating with him he 'reaches' beyond logical reason.

Most men like to be at least a little taller than most women.

Of course if a woman is a top .1 % of beautiful women and is tall men are not going to turn it down.

like most women are not going to turn down a man who looks like tom cruise for being short.

 

[Medina]

exactly, that's what i find not pure.
a short man is a turnoff for women, but a shot girl is not a turnoff for men.
women mate higher, men mate mostly with their lookmatches.

this shows that what women want from men is protection and ressources (if we're still at the jungle). it's like using him as a tool. a hired gun, a free bodyguard. it's funny even after the invention of martial arts and civilisation they still thing we're still living in the jungle.
we see it in the tournament primates, females share one dominant alpha male ... UNTIL a new alpha takes over the lead, and they will all ditch the loser of the fight and go with the victor (much like human history).

men mate like pair bonding species, they need to get attached to a female (love) in order to get her ressources when she's pregnant.
women do not need to get attached (love) a man, because replacing a man with a higher ranking male will be benificial for her.

men love women, women USE men.

That is nonsense. Men are rarely attached to women which why engagement, anniversaries, valentines, birthdays etc often fall onto the woman in the relationship.

Women are emotional, they won't f*** unless a connection has been built. Men on the other hand are visual, did you know we f*** trees with vaginas?

You take the alpha thing far too seriously, a lot of women out there are turned off by cocky dominant men. And btw I am short (about Tom Cruises height) and I've never had a problem

 

[Min0]

That is nonsense. Men are rarely attached to women which why engagement, anniversaries, valentines, birthdays etc often fall onto the woman in the relationship.

Women are emotional, they won't f*** unless a connection has been built. Men on the other hand are visual, did you know we f*** trees with vaginas?

You take the alpha thing far too seriously, a lot of women out there are turned off by cocky dominant men. And btw I am short (about Tom Cruises height) and I've never had a problem

yes men are programmed to f*** anything that move BUT also to fall in love with a woman and built a long term relationship with her (most of the time , at least untill the kids can survive. it is an evolutionary imperative, because since humans became bipedal their females became vunerable when pregnant. they needed a man attached to her emotionally so he can stay with her to provide for her while pregnant and feed the children later.
women on the other hand, do not need to get attached to a man, because replacing the current male with a superior one is benificial to her.

i've explained my thaught on the subject on another thread.

 

[That Guy]

That is nonsense. Men are rarely attached to women which why engagement, anniversaries, valentines, birthdays etc often fall onto the woman in the relationship.

Women are emotional, they won't f*** unless a connection has been built. Men on the other hand are visual, did you know we f*** trees with vaginas?

You take the alpha thing far too seriously, a lot of women out there are turned off by cocky dominant men. And btw I am short (about Tom Cruises height) and I've never had a problem

Lestat, I'm afraid you are arguing with MGTOW; someone who does not believe that women are capable of a human trait called "love".

You're wasting your time.