whatintheworld
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 1,231
I find it funny that you say "look at the science" while in the next sentence recommending a totally untested, unscientific, and unproven drug that is NOT FDA approved for hairloss, or approved for hairloss ANYWHERE in the world. If you want to go anecdotal that's fine, but don't be a hypocrite with science. It's long-term effects, as well as it's PROVEN efficacy are unknown.
And as far as "If it didn't happen to me it can't happen to anyone else", it's quite the opposite. The people who are getting these incredibly rare side effects are trying to SCARE her into not doing what's best for her child, as the same mold tried to scare me when I was 16. I'm simply stating that this idea of guaranteed, impending doom that they are portraying is false.
Did I ever once say side effects were impossible? No. I said they were very rare, which they are. The science supports that. Unless of course, you'd like to cherry pick which science you'd want to support, as many do on here.
There is never a "good" solution for this disease. You are merely picking between the lesser of evil of many bad options. But unfortunately it's all we have.
We do know for a fact that DHT does play an important role in sex characteristic development in males. So to suppress this hormone at such a young age with such drastic measures would give any reasonable person pause.
I'm not necessarily advocating septipiprant, just pointing out that at such a young age, if someone put a gun to my head and said I had to use something to treat my hairloss, I would rather give that a try instead of finasteride and dutasteride.
In reality though, I would probably do nothing in OP's shoes because it's likely that the cards her son was dealt are too strong to be overcome given our available options.
Keep in mind I'm a finasteride user saying all this.
Last edited: