- Reaction score
- 1,132
I find it funny that you say "look at the science" while in the next sentence recommending a totally untested, unscientific, and unproven drug that is NOT FDA approved for hairloss, or approved for hairloss ANYWHERE in the world. If you want to go anecdotal that's fine, but don't be a hypocrite with science. It's long-term effects, as well as it's PROVEN efficacy are unknown.
And as far as "If it didn't happen to me it can't happen to anyone else", it's quite the opposite. The people who are getting these incredibly rare side effects are trying to SCARE her into not doing what's best for her child, as the same mold tried to scare me when I was 16. I'm simply stating that this idea of guaranteed, impending doom that they are portraying is false.
Did I ever once say side effects were impossible? No. I said they were very rare, which they are. The science supports that. Unless of course, you'd like to cherry pick which science you'd want to support, as many do on here.
The science supports that DHT is important during puberty, for many reasons
FDA PROVEN