A Study Regarding The Importance Of Personality

[yetti]

Considering that the only guys who agree with you are good-looking and usually over 25 that's hardly a surprise.

"the only guys who agree"? As I write this, there's only one post here that has 3 likes, mine. It's not a minority.

 

[yetti]

Two guys look about the same. One is a serial killer second one is a philanthropist. No difference?

Lot's of people walk around unsmiling and antisocial, and lots of other guys walk around smiling and social. My example wasn't extreme at all.

 

[Medina]

Two guys look about the same. One is a serial killer second one is a philanthropist. No difference?

Many serial killers lure their victims with their looks. But they can be charismatic too.

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

"the only guys who agree"? As I write this, there's only one post here that has 3 likes, mine. It's not a minority.

ThErE's OnLy OnE pOsT hErE tHaT hAs 3 LiKeS, mInE. iT's NoT a MiNoRiTy.

 

[yetti]

3 LiKeS oN yOuR pOsT mAkEs It TrUe
View attachment 57156

Doesn't make it true. But it does mean exactly what I said it means.

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

Doesn't make it true. But it does mean exactly what I said it means.

DoEsN't MaKe It TrUe. BuT iT dOeS mEaN eXaCtLy WhAt I sAiD iT mEaNs.

 

[Dante92]

DoEsN't MaKe It TrUe. BuT iT dOeS mEaN eXaCtLy WhAt I sAiD iT mEaNs.
View attachment 57157

We'd just need to see a pic of the guy. And those who agree with him are all above 6-7 and bluepilled, what a surprise.

 

[yetti]

No, the personality never matters.

) :

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

) :

We found that after an initial introduction (well, in our study interactions were one-sided with one person, the target, talking about themselves, and another person, the responder, listening) responders were romantically interested in targets they perceived to be more attractive than themselves. That was it. Perceptions of the targets’ personality and other characteristics were not important. We also found that perceiving similarity or dissimilarity did not matter.

http://www.psypost.org/2017/03/pers...initial-romantic-attraction-study-finds-48362

 

[yetti]

We found that after an initial introduction (well, in our study interactions were one-sided with one person, the target, talking about themselves, and another person, the responder, listening) responders were romantically interested in targets they perceived to be more attractive than themselves. That was it. Perceptions of the targets’ personality and other characteristics were not important. We also found that perceiving similarity or dissimilarity did not matter.

http://www.psypost.org/2017/03/pers...initial-romantic-attraction-study-finds-48362

New research published in the European Journal of Personality indicates that perceived personality traits play no role in romantic interest when first being introduced to someone.

So what? How about after getting to know someone for several weeks? A colleague, a classmate, a guy you recognize who smiles at you in the store when you see him? If your point is that personality has no affect on attraction, then this study does nothing to further your point. If your point is that when first being introduced to someone physical attractiveness is everything, then OK, sure... but so what?

 

[Dante92]

We found that after an initial introduction (well, in our study interactions were one-sided with one person, the target, talking about themselves, and another person, the responder, listening) responders were romantically interested in targets they perceived to be more attractive than themselves. That was it. Perceptions of the targets’ personality and other characteristics were not important. We also found that perceiving similarity or dissimilarity did not matter.

http://www.psypost.org/2017/03/pers...initial-romantic-attraction-study-finds-48362

Just destroyed all of h.l and tellersqueal bullshit posts.

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

New research published in the European Journal of Personality indicates that perceived personality traits play no role in romantic interest when first being introduced to someone.

So what? How about after getting to know someone for several weeks? A colleague, a classmate, a guy you recognize who smiles at you in the store when you see him? If your point is that personality has no affect on attraction, then this study does nothing to further your point. If your point is that when first being introduced to someone physical attractiveness is everything, then OK, sure... but so what?

WHAT IF YOU'RE REJECTED THE SECOND YOU SAY "HELLO" YOU f*****g DENSE RETARD!

 

[yetti]

WHAT IF YOU'RE REJECTED THE SECOND YOU SAY "HELLO" YOU f*****g DENSE RETARD!

WHAT IF YOU ARENT AND ARE YOU 5 YEARS OLD?

 

[Dante92]

WHAT IF YOU ARENT AND ARE YOU 5 YEARS OLD?

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

WHAT IF YOU ARENT AND ARE YOU 5 YEARS OLD?

 

[yetti]

Instead of talking and debating, you call people retards, post pictures of childrens cartoons and say "Just destroyed all of h.l and tellersqueal bullshit posts" like little kids and then wonder why you can't get girls. Yeeeeeeeeah clearly it has nothing to do with personality, you're right. Never mind. Cool.

 

[JohnsonDDG]

Just destroyed all of h.l and tellersqueal bullshit posts.

I'll repeat myself again: I maintain that looks are important and probably the most important factor based off initial attraction.

After physical attraction is settled, its the individuals job not to lose that attraction by being, say: boring, poor, submissive, dull, etc.

So again, looks are very important, but if you are an unemployed weirdo with no social skills then their will be no sex on the cards either

 

[RegenWaiting]

View attachment 57159

This is what I would like to look like at 70! Man has this guy 'aged well' imo...

EDIT: Ok, maybe I streched it a little. 75ish...

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

Instead of talking and debating, you call people retards, post pictures of childrens cartoons and say "Just destroyed all of h.l and tellersqueal bullshit posts" like little kids and then wonder why you can't get girls. Yeeeeeeeeah clearly it has nothing to do with personality, you're right. Never mind. Cool.

I'm putting 0 effort in my post directed at you because you don't seem to read them anyways. I've already explained this to you in this thread and others. Yet you show up with the same stupid bluepill mentality. Why would I waste time writing coherent posts?

Do you really think that I talk about these subjects in this way in real life? And to girls even? I made a long post in another thread in a reply to you, you didn't respond if I remember correct. That's why I'm not spending any time on these posts. It's kind of talking to a wall at this point.

The way you talk right now is exactly what I hate. Now you blame my failures on my personality, so now I'm ugly AND have a shitty personality.

I guess I just need to focus on improving my personality??? That's a nice carrot on a stick. Too bad there's no finish line, maybe I'll spend a few years on this, wasting time being miserable. Then maybe at the end wherever that is there's a girl for me? Spoiler: There isn't, because personality doesn't matter.

Just stop giving advices to people who's problems you can't even comprehend. You're not able to put yourself in their shoes. It's like @Afro_Vacancy said in another post. You are meeting open doors and think you did something special to unlock them. While others are facing locked doors with spikes and mines around them. You're really not able to give advices to these people.

Did you even read the study on my OP? Personality doesn't matter, it's there in black and white. Have you seen the countless tinder experiments? Have you seen this legendary study from OkCupid? I don't know what else to say. This is the last time I'll respond to your bullshit.

Further proof that personality means f*** all:

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

This is what I would like to look like at 70! Man has this guy 'aged well' imo...

EDIT: Ok, maybe I streched it a little. 75ish...

My grandfather has hair like that guy. Life is cruel. He was one of the first to comment my hairloss when I was 20.