tino
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 0
Bryan said:tino said:citation from the study
"We were unable to identify androgen-responsive elements in the TGF-1 promoter. TGF-1 promoter activation by androgen is bald frontal DPC specific and is not observed in non-bald frontal DPC, suggesting that some intrinsic factor(s) in bald frontal DPC are required (data not shown). Factor(s) that are genetically involved in Androgenetic Alopecia would be the true target of the pathomechanism of the disease. Our modified co-culture system will provide clues to further explore the role of androgens in the regulation of hair growth."
Do they mean factors before tgf-beta induces his destroying work?
They are referring to the factor or factors which cause a difference in the RESPONSE of a given hair follicle to androgens (specifically in this case, whether or not TGF-1 is released in response to androgens).
I think it is clear so far that Androgenes induces a growth inhibiting tgf-beta signal in some genetic praedisposed scalp hair follicles,and a ? induced igf-1 modulated growth promoting signal in bearth and body hair follicles.I have no direct proove,but im very sure that tgf-beta downregulates the igf-1 and or his rececptors,which can crosstalk with insulin in male pattern baldness sensitive scalp hair follicles.I dont understand why this investigators did not also investigated if tgf-beta induces igf-1 deprivation or igf-1/insulin receptor downregulation.The missing signal,could be in the skin Redox Network,at least in the case of growth inhibition,but also in the case of growth promoting.A good working redox network,promotes growth(amongst others i allude to facts which says that the daily intake of vitamin c,correlats whith higher serum igf-1),and a not so good working redox network leads to growth inhibition.A naturally protection mechanism,if the system sees that there is a cancer promoting redox imbalance,it trys to downregulate everything what promotes growth.Still a big mystery are the thoughts of the nature.Why the scalp skin?And basically why the frontal and vertex scalp,and not the occiptal parts?To my theory,that the system negelected to protect hair in the case of unfavourable genetic,during which the system has to protect vital parts in the first line,suits not the fact,that hair follicles beyond the frontal and occiptal scalp,were also not worth to keep in metabolic activity.Frontal and especially vertex scalp,is mostly exposed to sunlight.Sunlight can induce skin cancer-mostly in pheomalnin caucasian individuals(Skin cancer in individuals of African, Asian, Latin-American, and American-Indian descent: differences in incidence, clinical presentation, and survival compared to Caucasians).male pattern baldness is also mostly common in caucasians and rare common in eumelain asians or africans(Current understanding of androgenetic alopecia. Part II: clinical aspects and treatment).ROS and TGF-beta have a role in skin cancer.UV Rays can upregulate TGF-beta,which acts as a tumor surpressor(http://www.nature.com/jid/journal/v119/ ... 1580a.html.).Maybe the evolution regulated a long time ago,that populations who are very sensitive to skin cancer,express more TGF-beta in high metabolic active skin parts,which are mostly sun exposed.The AR Polymorphism could just be an unfortunate trigger,which interacts casual(maybe over ROS) whith the evoulutionaery volitional TGF-beta-tumor surpressing genetic in sun exposed scalp parts.