The Natural
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 13
this isnt a damn expository writing class. no one has plagiarized anything because no one is purporting that the discussion concerning equol is original research. if you dont think science or the science behind products used for balding is relevant to whether to use those products id disagree.
how can we discuss the actual effects when we are at most 1 week into treatment with this product? nothing generates a result in 1 week.
of course, it is legit to worry that a company selling a supplement didnt label the ingreds. lets hope its because they are neophytes in this industry. as long as it has active ingredient thats mainly what matters. i doubt theyd use something harmful if they wanted to generate some kind of tangible revenue off the thing.
"No one has plagiarized anything" is a rather broad statement. It is inaccurate as well. Anytime a person knowingly presents someone else's ideas, theories, etc. as his own in written form, he/she is guilty of "plagiarism." And it happens all the time in forums. But we can agree to disagree about this issue.
The point that I was trying to make, albeit unsuccessfully, is that this thread needs to eventually turn itself toward ---> actual user results, rather than discussing (or "reciting") ideas and theories about equol ad nauseum.
So as Sparx suggests, why not let the thread cool down, until we are able to provide other members with this very useful information.