LawOfThelema
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 18
Yeah, Equol has been mentioned by serious medical and physiological researchers to have potential in treating androgen mediated conditions and is being tested by research institutions in Australia for the prostate as we speak. It's mechanism of action to bind DHT is as far as anyone knows completely unique and novel. No other compound is know to do this.
By my count shed is marginally reduced. By about 20%. More counts would be needed to see if its sustained and longer use will be needed to see if it could reduce further. Of course, I can not promise to continue to hedge my bets on using one treatment alone, and I will surely add-on to this regimen. In the spirit of being objective, I have to add that I can't count every hair that falls. I tried. And it's too exasperating. Makes you feel too neurotic. I can only count the ones that accumulate in the brush and the shower drain. But from those two places hair accumulation has diminished somewhat.
This is why clinical studies are more valuable than personal experiements (TN is free to disagree with this assertion, but not everyone is as stoic as he is). Few balding individuals, including myself, are willing to risk losing more hair by just using one treatment which does not have proven or established track record. Hopefully someone will test this in a clinical setting vs androgenetic alopecia. Before I start with my other treatments, I will likely raise the dose on this further to see if I can nudge my shedding further with equol alone, but then I will add other treatment.
I encourage others to do hair counts if their hair is long enough and it is possible to see the hairs that fall. Without specialized equipment it seems to be one of the few objective measures available to you. Photos its hard to reproduce lighting and angles, but those you should do as well.
By my count shed is marginally reduced. By about 20%. More counts would be needed to see if its sustained and longer use will be needed to see if it could reduce further. Of course, I can not promise to continue to hedge my bets on using one treatment alone, and I will surely add-on to this regimen. In the spirit of being objective, I have to add that I can't count every hair that falls. I tried. And it's too exasperating. Makes you feel too neurotic. I can only count the ones that accumulate in the brush and the shower drain. But from those two places hair accumulation has diminished somewhat.
This is why clinical studies are more valuable than personal experiements (TN is free to disagree with this assertion, but not everyone is as stoic as he is). Few balding individuals, including myself, are willing to risk losing more hair by just using one treatment which does not have proven or established track record. Hopefully someone will test this in a clinical setting vs androgenetic alopecia. Before I start with my other treatments, I will likely raise the dose on this further to see if I can nudge my shedding further with equol alone, but then I will add other treatment.
I encourage others to do hair counts if their hair is long enough and it is possible to see the hairs that fall. Without specialized equipment it seems to be one of the few objective measures available to you. Photos its hard to reproduce lighting and angles, but those you should do as well.