Only guys who are not tall will deny the importance of height. A lot of short guys will deny its importance tooth and nail. It's like discussing the importance of looks with an ugly person.
They'll say "it's not that important" to protect themselves. A bit like me with mass and muscles being important. The difference that I clearly manage without them.
Ugly guys or short guys will deny the importance of looks and height while being permanently single.
Maybe I would get hotter women if I was larger? I would still rate face and height as more important when it comes to mating.
I think you have mild autism. You show no shame in saying that which is inconvenient and controversial.
For whatever it's worth, so do I. I took this Canadian test recently and scored 29/50, a somewhat high score.
http://www.autismcanada.org/about-autism/diagnosis/screening-tools/adult/?gclid=CKWzvtCuncwCFQZZhgodySUCaQ
Personally, as somebody who i 5'11, I have no problem realising that at 6'2 I'd do better. I don't understand why other people need to live in a cloud of denial and fantasy. It seems like they're more worried about the snapshot of their fragile ego in that moment than in the long-term benefits of a reality-oriented worldview.
With respect to yourself I suggest you would almost certainly do better with mild-to-moderate improvement in body composition. I can't give precise recommendations without knowing you better. I know that you rant against expensive nutritional supplements. Almost all supplements are fraudulent and most you don't need and won't benefit from. You've said you didn't benefit much from weight training last time, which to me suggests that you were either given an incompetent weight training program, or you should try a different exercise for body composition, maybe in your case swimming or yoga would be more beneficial. It depends on the body type. We can discuss it in more detail if you want.
There's a ~400-page thread over at bodybuilding.com where people discuss if they were treated better after losing weight. I've read 200 pages over a year. Some trends:
- Almost everybody says yes;
- Some people say they needed to lose fat, gain muscle, then lose fat again to get a lot of benefit with the ladies, these were probably the naturally skinnier ones;
- Some say they needed to lose the "fat guy mentality" after losing weight;
- In general taller men get more benefit from being in better shape;
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, face and height are the most important features.
Yes, but your face changes drastically if you lose fat and gain muscle.
I've lost ~20 kg (~45 lbs) of weight so far, and my face looks very different.
Also:
https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081007162641AAbJlDf
No no no these people are ignorant. The guy above me especially. Yes lifting weights does change you face. When you lift weights. Mostly compound movements, it produces a hormone called testosterone. It secretes from your testes. Testosterone can do many things mostly build muscle. It also enhances you face. People that have more testosterone have less body fat, and can alter bone composition. Which is why we don't have the same face as when we were babies i.e. more pronounced jawbone. Bigger brow bigger defined chin. But women don't produce that much T so their features will not be as pronounced. If you look at people who take steroids look at their face. Steroids are just synthetic T, their face grows abnormally and organs grow as well which is sometimes you hear people say "juice" gut or GH gut But if you look at this pic http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n98/rmoore1969/sp_giambi_steroids1-1.jpg
you notice his skull grew past his eyes on the side of his head. Just one of the side effects of steroids.
So in conclusion your you face does change from working out. Another thing is that the more muscle you work out at once hence FULL BODY exercises the more T you produce. Not by going to the gym and doing a few curls.