Hair is not Life but it's Pretty Damn Close; HRT and Pictorial Posts Prove it.

How far are you willing to go to restore a full head of hair?

  • Full-blown Feminization

    Votes: 42 15.9%
  • Slight Gyno

    Votes: 44 16.7%
  • Slight Breast Growth

    Votes: 28 10.6%
  • Only "Male" Treatments

    Votes: 90 34.1%
  • Dude, I won't even touch finasteride

    Votes: 60 22.7%

  • Total voters
    264

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
Letter to the Editor, Perfect Hair Health:


Jane Loeffler

May 8, 2018 at 3:01 am



Rob,
I really admire your intellect and web site. The article on transgender individuals regaining hair matched the non-conclusive, cataloging research that I had done. I feel as though I have insight that could be helpful. Like many on your site, I have tried various and sundry ways to maintain my hair, from vitamins to minoxidil to surgery, then to Proscar but stopping to have a family and then going on Dutasteride after my children were born. Polysorbate actually seemed beneficial which was the infomercial rage in the mid-80s. Most people would say that I have a normal head of hair for a 53 year old. I can part my hair but I have some recession in the front and a bald spot that is visible depending on the light but that sometimes looks decently full. My side-patterns (fringe regions) remain intact and high. Many balding men go deep into the fringe area, so I hope that I am not complaining too much. When you start balding young, you think of yourself that way, even if hair loss stabilizes. I am still trying for more and better hair and research upon oneself is a tradition going way back.
Estrogen is not regulated in any serious way. This completely differs from testosterone for which one can serve serious time for possession without a prescription. Estrogen may grow hair but it does not make you good at sports so the powers that be largely ignore it.
Amazon sells a pretty potent estradiol/estriol blend for $19 that I have used since about 2013 when I became disappointed when it was evident that not even dutasteride was growing any hair back, as opposed to maintaining it. You can do the math but because it is a three quarters estriol/one quarter estradiol lotion, my calculations based upon the ratios and relative strengths of estriol and estradiol indicated that, roughly, one four ounce pump canister if used equally for seven days, would be equivalent to 6 to 8 mg of estradiol orally. Many transgender patients take 2 to 4 mg of estradiol orally each day, so you actually can get a big dose from transdermals.
When I could get my hands on it, I opted for Estrogel, which is pure estradiol, but which can require a prescription but mg for mg, there probably is not a lot of difference in terms of price/mgs of estradiol. Here is the Amazon version. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003LYDBCG
/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I have bought it on eBay as well. Sometimes Estrogel has been available on eBay. The Indian connection for obtaining prescription drugs has gotten more difficult and Amazon has the Bi-estro to my door in two days. I wish that it were solely estradiol but it is still at my door in two days so it is hard to complain.
So, without wasting too much of your time, does the Bi-estro work to grow hair? My answer is that it is still not clear to me whether it helps regrow hair or not. I firmly believe that it does/will but I am still taking dutasteride and I believe that most people (or scientists) would say that I am losing my hair extremely slowly rather than regaining it. I started balding at 18 in 1983 but minoxidil came out soon after that so I have had help that previous generations have not. My father is 80 and has Ronald Reagan hair and my mother has impossibly good hair for an 80 year old so the genetics is complicated. Both of my siblings, one male and one female have similar struggles with hair loss to mine, not overt baldness but more generalized thinning.
So I have kept pushing the estrogen. I feel as though there has to be a connection. I had terrible dermatitis, which would erupt into sores all over my head and estrogen cleared it up. I started using estrogen on my face which was blotchy, oily and difficult to shave without bleeding and irritation and all of that has cleared up. Estrogen does great things to skin in general.
So I have insight into the side effects of topical estrogen both on the head, face and two other control areas. Honestly, in my opinion, the side effects of estrogen, if someone is not actively trying to transition to the female sex, are pretty mild. I have never had any side effects from Proscar or dutasteride and I firmly believe that neither of those drugs have significant sides for many or most people.
First of all, yes, topical estrogen goes systemic. It seems to improve hair quality, which is often overlooked by the balding population, immediately. Let’s face it. There are millions of people with full heads of hair of frizzy hair that is difficult to style or comb and that does not look good or blow in the breeze well. For people like me, a significant increase in hair quality, even if the numbers don’t increase makes a big difference. I believe that the vast majority of men could benefit from topical estrogen at low risk. You start slow and you don’t push the dosage if gyno is a big deal to you and you monitor your erections and that is about it, at least in my case.
Your penis will not shrink and unless you push the dosage, you may still get erections without trouble and if not, v**** works for people in this situation. The testicle definitely shrink but can rebound if hormones are stopped.
Yes. I have gyno which does not matter that much to me, but even to those who fear it, gyno is far, far better than the scalp and facial conditions that I had due to dermatitis. On many, if not most men, the breast tissue will not be particularly prominent because men have fairly wide chests which flattens the tissue out. This is why most transgender women who want to be passable get breast implants. Otherwise the breast growth can be managed. If I had to choose between the head of hair that I had at 17 but with gyno, then that is an easy choice for me. Sexual side-effects are reversible. Yes, if you hit the estrogen heavy, you won’t want sex for a few days but is that such a tragedy?
The topicals also tie in to the massage idea. It takes quite a few pumps and many minutes of massage to consume several mgs of estrogen lotion. Thus, in a sense, it forces scalp massage. Since I just came across your transgender article, I recommitted to the attempt with estrogen by using more and combining it with increased massage. I do think that topical administration may take larger amounts than does oral administration.
A lot of things are happening now with respect to gender. Many of us are ashamed to admit that our attachment to our past hair might be indicative of binary or non-binary transgender issues. These concepts barely existed prior to Jenner in the public eye. Thus, now one can use estrogen to attempt to get the hairline that one wants. There is no need to become female or to want to become female. In my experience, most, if not all of the effects of estrogen, even after being used together with dutasteride off and on for years, are reversible and fairly quickly reversible. Yes, the testicles rebound and fast. The breasts decrease and with weight loss decrease even more, although there is an unalterable change in some of the core breast tissue. That change is a positive to me regardless of whether I identify as male or female. When I went off estrogen, I began fighting dermatitis again.
I read a lot about depression and estrogen, and estrogen changing one’s though processes. I don’t believe that it is true, except that it clinically makes a person less aggressive but this effect is subtle, if true.
In the past, the powers that be, refused to prescribe hormones to non-binary transsexuals. You had to sign something saying that you intended to change your sex in order to receive prescribed hormones. This appears much less true now. People should do some research and speak to their doctors and evaluate the risks of therapies using flutamide or spironolactone or estrogen.
Having finally upped the topical dosage of the Bi-estro products to one seventh of the canister per seven days, I think that I am seeing effects but people also have to realize that hair regrowth is not like grass growing on a lawn. We all look at our temples for little hairs. Maybe, but what is really happening is that the longer hairs are staying put longer and shaft diameters are increasing. I feel so bad for these guys desperately looking for little vellus hairs in the mirror and complaining about sheds. Every single guy on the various hair loss forums says the same thing: “Just started Treatment X yesterday but I am worried because I am doing an immediate shed.” Sorry, it is not a shed. You are still going bald. I know that there is some basis for the notion of shedding after some period of time when using certain remedies but I am firmly convinced that a “shed” is for the vast majority of us, a simple euphemism for “damn, it isn’t working.” The companies all love pushing the “shed” idea. Keep using it. Maybe it will work later if you buy more.
So, as you have indicated in your article, we know that many transgender and non-binary transgender people using female hormones and androgen blockers experience great improvements in their hair. I am going to try adding oral estrogen, flutamide or spironolactone to the estrogen and 1 mg of dutasteride mix. It takes a lot of effort to massage the topical estrogen daily. Luckily, due to your site, I don’t mind massaging for minutes and minutes and minutes to attempt to validate the massage idea.
As an aside, I believe in Nizoral and Dutasteride and I find pretty much the rest of the male-oriented hair loss mixtures to be either ineffective or not worth the trouble. Most are costly For what it costs and having to use it everyday, I don’t believe that minoxidil is worth the trouble. I think that the piece of the puzzle that differentiates me from the transgender people that you highlighted in your article is that my testosterone levels continue high and that might be hindering break-out growth. The literature on female baldness remedies references this need to move testosterone levels down to help regrowth.
By adding something to lower testosterone, that may be the last puzzle piece. It may also be that by upping the topical estrogen to the max, more or less, that that will lower the testosterone. Even though I have decided to be/become non-binary transgender, I still worry about libido and strength so I don’t want to lower my testosterone levels more than I have to. I hope to provide some input to anyone with questions. A lot of these guys seem to think that they are going to spontaneously combust if they touch estrogen. I think that the so-called side effects of estrogen are generally mild, unless the dosage is pushed and that what side effects do occur, for many people are an improvement, such as a decrease in acne, dandruff or oily skin or less body hair or much more sensitive skin and breasts and an improvement in hair quality. The soles of my feet used to be like tough leather they were so cross-linked and rough. Now they are smooth and pliable. That is all estrogen.
I really appreciate your site and your approach and I sincerely hope (and think) that you are right about most of your contentions and I share many of them.
Yours truly,
Jane Loeffler
Reply

  • View attachment 157106

    Rob

    May 22, 2018 at 10:49 pm

    Hey Jane,
    Thanks for taking the time to read the content on this site, and for taking the time to write out your comments. I really appreciate it.
    I’m still researching whether, for most binary men, how drastic of an effect topical estrogens could have from transdermal systemic absorption. The evidence suggests that estrogen (less so serum estrogen, and more so estrogen in skin tissues) appears to be pro-hair for both genders, and is involved in the stimulation of secondary hair for men and women (even without DHT). The exception is estrogen dominance in younger men (high serum estrogen / elevated estrogen metabolites — which is linked to inflammation). The questions that remain: what’s the mechanism of action? Is it estrogen specifically, or something further downstream? And what are the risks / side effects at each potential dosage / delivery?
    Since I don’t yet have answers to the above, I can’t give you a concrete opinion on using Bi-estro for the treatment of male pattern baldness in the general population of men. But your perspective helps tremendously. It seems like it’s helping you, and if you’re comfortable with its related effects, then I hope it continues to help. Please keep me updated with your progress. I look forward to hearing more!
    Best,
    Rob
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
This episode remains in my mind even after 25 years or whatever:


"Live, dammit, live! Every precious moment as if this were the last year of your life. Because in many ways, it is!"
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
Microneedling and Gauge Size:

I used my 2.0mm last night as my 2.5mm is still en route but I continue to notice that recovery time is much faster with this roller. Probably two things control this. Higher gauges are better for long hair and the needles might cause less inflammation upon insertion. Also, these rollers should be seen as throwaways because with the lower gauges you have to press down harder and they tend to dull easily and quickly. Probably four to six uses is optimal before replacement. Once a week, even twice a week or more is fine with DR and remember, these work everywhere on every kind of skin problem: cross-linked skin like calluses and soles of the feet, scar tissue, balding tissue, sun-damaged and freckled skin and so forth. Always try to do a few passes on your face because it has wonderful rejuvenating effects and when used with tretinoin, the improvements can be radical as we used to say and the word works in both senses. Everyone should consider microneedling, balding or not.
 

Norwoody

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,793
Microneedling and Gauge Size:

I used my 2.0mm last night as my 2.5mm is still en route but I continue to notice that recovery time is much faster with this roller. Probably two things control this. Higher gauges are better for long hair and the needles might cause less inflammation upon insertion. Also, these rollers should be seen as throwaways because with the lower gauges you have to press down harder and they tend to dull easily and quickly. Probably four to six uses is optimal before replacement. Once a week, even twice a week or more is fine with DR and remember, these work everywhere on every kind of skin problem: cross-linked skin like calluses and soles of the feet, scar tissue, balding tissue, sun-damaged and freckled skin and so forth. Always try to do a few passes on your face because it has wonderful rejuvenating effects and when used with tretinoin, the improvements can be radical as we used to say and the word works in both senses. Everyone should consider microneedling, balding or not.
Source for yours? Do you apply maximum pressure?
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
I use what seems to be exactly the right pressure so mostly I let the roller's longer teeth do the work. I see no more bleeding nor does it hurt today when combing and those things were the norm for me before.
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033

9
Posted by
u/Ambrosia25

3 years ago


A ranking of AAs in terms of Safety, Effectiveness, Tolerability and Cost (inexpensiveness)​

renderTimingPixel.png

The safest way? That would be transdermal estradiol. The former is an [estrogen](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estrogen_(medication)) and will cause feminization (e.g., breast development, feminine fat distribution, mental changes, etc.) while the latter is essentially an antiandrogen and will turn off sex hormone production by your gonads and reduce your testosterone levels by about 95%. This combination is about as safe as you can get (not really differing much from what cisgender women have from a safety standpoint) and wouldn't really have any risks. It would also probably be the best regimen you could be on in terms of effectiveness and side effects.
That regimen might be pretty expensive though. The risks with hormones for transgender people overall are actually pretty low in general. There are other things that you could take that technically would be more "risky" but that would still have very low absolute risk and that might be much less expensive. Examples include oral or sublingual estradiol and other antiandrogens like spironolactone, cyproterone acetate, and bicalutamide.
Of these antiandrogens, spironolactone and bicalutamide are reasonably safe (although potassium monitoring is recommended with the former and liver monitoring is recommended with the latter) whereas cyproterone acetate has higher risks. Here is how I'd roughly rank the antiandrogens in terms of safety, effectiveness, tolerability (side effects), and cost (all in combination with an estrogen):
  • Safety: GnRH analogues > Spironolactone ≥ Bicalutamide >> Cyproterone acetate.
  • Effectiveness: GnRH analogues > Cyproterone acetate > Bicalutamide > Spironolactone.
  • Tolerability: GnRH analogues = Bicalutamide > Spironolactone > Cyproterone acetate.
  • Cost (inexpensiveness): Cyproterone acetate > Spironolactone > Bicalutamide >> GnRH analogues.
As an alternative, you could do higher-dose estrogen without an antiandrogen or with only a low dose of bicalutamide. Estrogens are actually antiandrogens themselves and can suppress testosterone levels by 95% similarly to GnRH analogues (link. However, you need higher estradiol levels than usual to achieve that. These higher levels may come with some safety risks like an increased risk of blood clots. However, the absolute risk would still be very low and that is particularly true for someone your age. [Note: the age of the OP which this comment was replying to is 17/18. The thread this post first appeared in can be read here.]
The pages linked above plus [this](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormone_replacement_therapy_(male-to-female)) article would be good places to start reading up on hormones.
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
This person is the head of Transfeminine Science and Kay also writes a lot there. They will answer specific question you want to pose, Almas but I am just posting studies and excerpts of studies so people can decide for themselves. I have no horse in this race but you seem to feel as though you understand all of this better than others and perhaps you do but the proof at least anecdotally for you is in the pudding. Instead you are conjecturing about endocrine factors that often don't make sense in terms of conjecture. A lot of this field is lightly tested and studied so often anecdotal reports are all that we have.

Anything by this gal is worth taking a look at. I don't encounter many folks that I necessarily defer to but I do defer to her and Kay generally as they read and write research papers with alacrity and precision.




om%2Ft5_l6wnj%2Fstyles%2FprofileIcon_j8f28b3brd361.jpg



Aly W. (u/Alyw234237) - Reddit


u/Alyw234237: Website: https://transfemscience.org/ Notice: Please don't message me for medical advice. Post in r/AskMtFHRT instead. (You can @ me …

2Fdesktop2x%2Fimg%2Ffavicon%2Fandroid-icon-192x192.png
www.reddit.com
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
An Uncensored Interview with Janey Elizabeth about HRT and Hair Loss and Rejuvenation and Anything Else that Comes to Mind.

Interviewer
: Janey, is it true that you have become an MtF just for the hair?

Janey: I often say that I am only in this for the hair. I think it's clever as a short-cut for being non-binary and it makes my mother accept all of this more easily.

Interviewer: But is it true? Can HRT turn a person into an MtF in terms of mental state?

I am not sure if it's true that I am only in this for the hair. That was true at the start but eh, my theories about hair regrowth via scalp-applied estrogen didn't work out in terms of being non-feminizing. I eventually had to make a hair regrowth versus breast deniability decision because I hadn't reached my hair goals and my breasts were rapidly growing in size and roundness. Ultimately, I opted more so for beauty than just for hair but I mean, I wasn't despondent as a male and I could tell that HRT was making me much more attractive facially and reining in somewhat my rampant dermatitis. My second big decision was beard removal which took ten years off my face and helped curb the dermatitis. Let me put it this way: I am just in it for the hair but Goddess threw in a hot bod and a cute face for free....

Interviewer: You don't seem to mind being called a guy. Why is that?

Janey: Well, I was a guy solely for 50 years and that is my experience largely as a female. I have a friend on here who thinks I might have been repressing my feelings all along and that might be true. I have mostly identified as androgynous but that is a less challenging thing to get my head around. I call people what they want to be called and use their pronouns.

Officially, I have changed my name to Jane Elizabeth and I am female according to my Driver's License. I might have opted for other but that's problematic too. I don't see myself as "other" in terms of being different. My breasts make sure that I don't get misgendered whether I pass or not so I don't have that issues gnawing at me. The best way to not get misgendered for me is to be as attractive as possible, male or female or androgynous because my breasts are far past the binding point which I would never do anyway. Most of us are XY's on here and using guys for gals is something that is done in the northeast of the U.S.

Interviewer: What about the term "tranny"?

Janey: My druthers is that people not use that term and I always point out that many transgender folks don't like that term because it seems disparaging in use and related to p**rn. If someone does it on a thread more than once, then I absent myself from the thread and I block that individual. I am about as un-PC as possible and I really don't care so much about the term directed at me as I do the antipathy from the person using it. People who state that "everyone on HRT regrows hair" are suspect as idiots from the start but transgender folks who question experimental meds or threads often receive such a throwaway line. We know that HRT can work to fully restore hair but it often does not for older guys and gals.

Interviewer: For guys, they all want to know whether it shrinks your junk or not.

Janey: Eh. It does and it doesn't. For some, it can appear dramatically smaller and thinner when flaccid but not when pulled length measuring is done. Cialis and v**** might forestall any shrinkage at all but the major issue is that many lose for a time, all or most libido and since blood flow tends to be use it or lose it, it can take away the ability to procreate and engage in penetrative sex. There is often if not always, substantially testicular shrinkage that appears to be largely reversible upon desisting from HRT. Sex can be experienced differently with stereotypical female sex drive which is not compulsive but chosen. Upping E2 levels can up female sex drive as both T and E2 up sex drive in females.

Depending upon E2 levels, though, in general the entire genital area can become intersex in appearance and more so feminine than male except for the lacking of any orifice. There is however a pseudo-orifice and the orgasms are definitely clitoral in type without the flush that males have after orgasm. Some times orgasm isn't even seen as particularly relevant as most cis-females will admit, as it's just enough. Elaine Benes is famous for saying that. There is a pronounced mons apparent and the testicles pull inward in a puckered fashion which is the pseudo-orifice. The scrotum thickens in appear and looks just like labia from certain angles. Estrogen has amazing healing powers and my foreskin grew back although it now resembles more a clitoral hood with clitoral hang. This is one reason why the SRS decision is so hard because sexually, SRS is a risk and it might lead to loss of clitoral feeling entirely. This makes a vulvoplasty the best option for those not interested in intercourse vaginally. Vaginoplasties are difficult and have a long recovery period. You generally can't do it incrementally except for orchiectomy as you lose vaginal depth.

Interviewer: Now you have been known to say that you would never go off of estrogen because it has powerful rejuvenizing effects. What do you mean by this exactly? Doesn't testosterone also have such rejuvenation effects?

Janey: Not in the same way. T can increase libido, maybe even organ size minimally and can help with ED. A person feels stronger and therefore younger. But it increases risk categories for virtually everything and promotes aggression and compulsive rut-like sexuality. It's actually a pretty dangerous med when used above prescribed limits. That's why T is controlled and estrogen is not. It also has to do with effects on sports performance to make cheating harder. Limitless T will exhaust a person adrenally and age a person quickly including inducing baldness. It is limited in its tissue-renewing capacity because it doesn't "view" the used up male tissue as being out of place. It might help some with chronic injuries but I have my doubts.

Estrogen on the other hand rewrites, re-matrixes, renews all tissue and the results can be spectacular. For me, no more neck or back pain. First, both got worse and made me sore but then all of my chronic pain was gone. I had a normal sex drive finally not an enormous compulsive one. I literally can smile now as T de-neotenizes the face, making smiling difficult for adult XY's. Friends even did an episode related to not being able to smile.

Interviewer: So has your sexual preference changed? What are the advantages of incorporating HRT for sexual purposes?

Janey: I love this question. Thank you so much for asking.

I mean, ultimately my preferences seem to be gradually widening but I am also more expected by society or less ashamed or whatever to admit that I might enjoy being the wife of an androgynous man with not much beard and gorgeous hair. Hopefully with a large penis of substantial girth. But I still am a little conflicted about being gay more so than being transgender. For males raised like me by fathers who had been in the military, wanting to be a sissy is shameful so I could never reconcile that. And according to Ephemeral Kitten, I was just repressed.

Anyway, last March, guy number one made a sincere try that was nigh close to assault, almost hilariously with my feet in the air, him trying to kiss me and holding me down with me pushing him with both hands back to the passenger side of the car. I think he kissed my cheeks only though but maybe the lips with a peck. But as soon as I got upright, I noticed that "he had it out" as quoted by Elaine Benis. And it was considerable.

We were supposed to be only vaping but maybe I am a tease? I had slacks on luckily and I used to only wear dresses and shorts or photograph Janey like that.

He was married and was supposed to already be home with the bar's take-out burgers and fries. This was pretty much the first day that I put on the wig so I am curious to see what my future holds. I still feel kind of guilty for turning him down as he was worthy so I don't know if I am getting gayer or not because back then I had very low libido still which is far from true now.

And in reference to using HRT to enhance sexuality in general, absolutely. Historically, male tops prefer slight, hairless, non-balding XY's with tiny penises and testicles. But it could be hard to find those exact packages all together. Now, with HRT, sissies attracted to men, can carefully calibrate hair, body hair, flaccid penis size and testicle reversion. All of this is good for daddies,too and I do often feel sorry for those guys<winks>. It's not their fault that they are drawn to anything remotely female like a typical hairless pair of buttocks.

The Greeks prized the boys who were tiniest and wrote poems about how horrible puberty was to beauty of boys. It was and is true and not speaking of anything illegal, but the eye interest in tiny genitalia is keen in many XY's. As some of us know, many of them are married but prefer males for sex because it seems like more of a challenge to get or because it turns them on to see how tiny femmes are compared to them and it turns femmes on as well. The contrast is very sexual and base.
 
Last edited:

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
So yes, above I give all of the dirt and details about HRT and sexual dimorphism among whites, here, with a long interview that I composed. I thoroughly believe that someone needs to provide all of the information even of tittering quality about HRT effects. Folks request that I post my breasts sans nipples for worst case scenario but I am not sensible about nipples or showing all to people on my site depending upon the taste and politeness of the questioner and particularly open to it via PM. You guys have a right to see worst scenario vs. best scenario and I represent both depending upon one's point of view in terms of avoiding feminization. I will add to the interview if certain questions come up or if readers just want to know or have probability assessments about potential feminization. Petite guys feminize more and more authentically as a rule of thumb. I am also addition an advice column format if there is interest:

Goddess Bless


https://www.hairlosstalk.com/interact/threads/hair-is-not-life-but-its-pretty-damn-close-hrt-and-pictorial-posts-prove-it.130425/page-32
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
Got home from the Supermarket and it is thrilling because everyone takes me absolutely without doubt as a female. One thing I do is to add some feminine lilt and like my mother, I often say, honey or sweetie to the younger girls and they don't blink an eye. Or I will say, I just love your hair or makeup and you can tell that they aren't threatened at all even by my voice. I went into the ladies and there was a younger girl cleaning and of course I have a mask on but it's so exciting to only be thought of as female. It is still new to me.
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
Two Invitations

My Maryland Zoom transgender video group meets tomorrow night and my P.A. for HRT is going to be the guest and anyone who wants to participate and learn and ask questions related to HRT for an expert. I will give you a link to get the passcode.

Then on the 23rd, my polyamory group is having a party via Zoom which is oriented to sensual pleasure for all genders and legal fetishes. We usually have an edifying pre-chat and then go to specialty rooms. I often hang out with the FtM's. I used to go to the live parties at a safe house we all knew but the pandemic has stopped that. I used to wear dresses but not a wig or makeup so I enjoy getting a chance to present as Janey this way at least. They usually cost $10 to $25 bucks for donation/entry fee. There might be some slight screening though to make sure that people are on the up and up and agree not to photograph or discuss anything that they saw, very eyes wide shut style but I would love to see anyone interested in any of these.
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
Question by Reader:

Biestro makes my scalp really itchy. Does this mean anything? I currently have (I am female) full coverage but I also need a masking agent to look my best. I can't bear to wear a wig at work as it would be too jarring.


It might be that your scalp is itching because the Biestro is working. Apparently at first when meds work they can cause inflammation which might cause itching. This is what worries me because according to the owner of HairLossTalk.com, it might be necessary to pass through a shed to restart hair growth. So it can be a Catch-22 thing: https://www.hairlosstalk.com/news/education/understanding-shedding-hair-loss-treatment/

He states that a person should use Keto, or I would add Nizoral and Selsun Blue for the inflammation and itching to hopefully slow shedding. But we want to make sure that your covering agent will still be comprehensive enough in the short term. That's why Bridgeburn and I have an advantage because he started off bald, and I had my total shed, so it was only good from then on. But I was all but completely bald for several months. Once my beard removal was mostly done, I donned a wig to get me to the point where my hair is long enough to frame my face and cover my ears since white females usually have hair long enough to do both things except maybe Dorothy Hammill.

I think that you can fully recover from this but you might still want a wig as a back-up but that has to be your choice or not. I am suggesting that guys look into a hair system temporarily. It might be that with keto and by going gradually, you can avoid any shedding but we don't really know why some do more so. But it appears that the meds increase follicle size so the body sheds the old hairs so that anagen can be linked up when everything re-starts. I get that it's hard to think about a wig but honestly, many if not most black women wear them and many black MtF's wear them because their own hair is perhaps not easy to grow long and there's sort of an MtF look that many of us seek that might not be relevant to cis-females. Many women wear them on special occasions. My mother used to wear one in her 20's and she had perfect hair but everyone wanted the Marlo Thomas, That Girl Look from the show, That Girl.
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033




bridgeburn said:


do you put it on your head?
No it would cost an arm and a leg. I use it on my lashes and brows. Makes them really really long and darker. To be honest I have been tempted to try it on my scalp but it would cost so much. I think 6 x 3ml bottles costs like $80 as it is. I would need to cover my whole scalp which is like a bottle a day, so potentially like $100 a week. That’s $5200 a year.

Janey agrees.
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033




Jesse Navarro said:


Thanks again Bridgeburn. Sorry to disturb you again, but how many pumps do you take? I'm using a 0,6 estradiol gel.
Jesse Navarro said:


I left my laziness behind and did a research. Guess ill use two pumps
my gel doesn't have a pump measurement system. basically like a tube of toothpaste i squeeze it out onto a measurement stick tool. My regimen with the gel has changed a few times so hard to answer how much i take. currently, im not using gel just 4mg of estrofem pills. but before ive used:

with 50mg cypro i used 1.5mg topical E
and then 25mg cypro and 2.25mg topical E
and then no cypro and 3mg topical E
and then a 2mg E pill and 1.5mg topical E
and then for a couple weeks i used 1 diane35 pill and 1.5mg topical E
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
Well, maintainace would be something. Surely if CB could be combined with something like either topical minoxidil or topical stemox, plus nizoral shampoo and dermarolling then it might be possible to get some regrowth?
I am very high on micro-needling for face and scalp and neck even if you use no carrier. Some people have limited success on things like CB or RU and a couple of others but it's not clear that it's regrowth as opposed to a lengthening of anagen. For younger guys such regrowth from topical min or these can be impressive and restore a hairline for a while. Otherwise, you are right.

I am not dissing maintenance at all. Maintenance is the crowing achievement in the history of baldness. I maintained for years and years on Min/finasteride and Duta and then it stopped working. None of these ever regrew hair for me though. I started early on Min at 26 and still use it and have barely ever missed a day; same with finasteride and no sides from these. But RU and CB are used mostly by folks with crippling sides from Min/finasteride or people just wary. Maybe if someone used loads and hundreds of dollars of them plus enza or daro or whatever these guys are using or touting, maybe some cosmetically significant regrowth is barely possible.

Even on the few HRT threads only a couple of people currently post pics, maybe two or three of us but mostly only me and I have stopped posting as much because it seems like bragging or inviting bad karma but for folks using any of these meds, use something for inflammation and titrate upwards slowly to reduce the chances of shedding but there are no guarantees and any and all of these meds might cause benevolent shedding isn't worth it in terms of cost/benefit. Bridgeburn and I were both cueballs with his only from male pattern baldness and half of mine being from a massive shed to baldness. Neither of us stopped at any point, nor did we even titrate downward. We both increased our estrogen levels to those of cis-females but several times more, say from 800 pg/ml to for me 2,500 pg/ml the last year.

With HRT there is no looking back. Do not start HRT if you are not going to see it through. You don't have to be MtF but you cannot let your E2 levels drop below about 200 to 300 pg/ml and you need to stay there for six to 18 months, which both of us did. I have tested but his protocol was just as extreme. 2,500 pg/ml freaked my doctor out but I won't stay here forever. We both added oral min when we were already seeing good results. If you want long hair, this is it unless you are under 23 and caught it right away. I wanted to be a hero and find a middle way but it didn't work and it doesn't work for many MtF's. Know why? Cause the boobs and fat *** and facial feminization all come before the really good hair. I wish I could be more sanguine but I strongly advise against anything from HRT or anything like RU or fleuridil or whatever cause you might shed and then struggle to recover and they don't do much alone anyway. None of them are close to min/finasteride, nor is alfatradiol. But that's a slew of great meds for you to try with the Big 3 and the peripheral ones I have mentioned.
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
N.B. None of this applies to people who are cis-female. They have their own issues in that there aren't really foolproof protocols for them. Small amounts of estriol might very well resolve their hair issues as might small amounts of AA's. They are not fighting upstream in this like XY's. I know less about female pattern baldness also because there's not much research just for them but minoxidil tends to work for them at far lower dosages even minuscule ones but sometimes it does not. I recommend everyone start with the pink box of Min at 2 percent regardless. Like most, I have figured, oh two percent, what's the point? There's plenty of point to it as it is less likely to jar the system and cause sheds if titrated upwards slowly. Some might start at less than two percent along with things that reduce inflammation for maintenance and that can work great for females and those with incipient baldness but oral Min works better in general by many multiples of efficacy.
 

jd_uk

Senior Member
Reaction score
302
I am very high on micro-needling for face and scalp and neck even if you use no carrier. Some people have limited success on things like CB or RU and a couple of others but it's not clear that it's regrowth as opposed to a lengthening of anagen. For younger guys such regrowth from topical min or these can be impressive and restore a hairline for a while. Otherwise, you are right.

I am not dissing maintenance at all. Maintenance is the crowing achievement in the history of baldness. I maintained for years and years on Min/finasteride and Duta and then it stopped working. None of these ever regrew hair for me though. I started early on Min at 26 and still use it and have barely ever missed a day; same with finasteride and no sides from these. But RU and CB are used mostly by folks with crippling sides from Min/finasteride or people just wary. Maybe if someone used loads and hundreds of dollars of them plus enza or daro or whatever these guys are using or touting, maybe some cosmetically significant regrowth is barely possible.

Even on the few HRT threads only a couple of people currently post pics, maybe two or three of us but mostly only me and I have stopped posting as much because it seems like bragging or inviting bad karma but for folks using any of these meds, use something for inflammation and titrate upwards slowly to reduce the chances of shedding but there are no guarantees and any and all of these meds might cause benevolent shedding isn't worth it in terms of cost/benefit. Bridgeburn and I were both cueballs with his only from male pattern baldness and half of mine being from a massive shed to baldness. Neither of us stopped at any point, nor did we even titrate downward. We both increased our estrogen levels to those of cis-females but several times more, say from 800 pg/ml to for me 2,500 pg/ml the last year.

With HRT there is no looking back. Do not start HRT if you are not going to see it through. You don't have to be MtF but you cannot let your E2 levels drop below about 200 to 300 pg/ml and you need to stay there for six to 18 months, which both of us did. I have tested but his protocol was just as extreme. 2,500 pg/ml freaked my doctor out but I won't stay here forever. We both added oral min when we were already seeing good results. If you want long hair, this is it unless you are under 23 and caught it right away. I wanted to be a hero and find a middle way but it didn't work and it doesn't work for many MtF's. Know why? Cause the boobs and fat *** and facial feminization all come before the really good hair. I wish I could be more sanguine but I strongly advise against anything from HRT or anything like RU or fleuridil or whatever cause you might shed and then struggle to recover and they don't do much alone anyway. None of them are close to min/finasteride, nor is alfatradiol. But that's a slew of great meds for you to try with the Big 3 and the peripheral ones I have mentioned.

Hm.. interesting. I've actually spent tonight researching fluridil/eucapil and had settled on the idea of trying that at some point, but your mention of shedding and not recovering is a concern as I definitely don't want that. I just want some sort of topical DHT inhibition with no risk of sides or altering internal DHT levels. That's why I'm personally not interested in oral finasteride (even though i know it would give the best chance of keeping my hair), and of course am not interested in anything more feminising either. I'm a strength athlete so things like high testosterone and DHT are very important, and I also just don't want to risk sexual function either.

At the moment I've just started dermarolling once per week and using keto 2% shampoo three times per week. I was thinking maybe I could then add fluridil and perhaps a growth stimulant like minoxidil or stemoxydine then. (Actually had a bad experience with minoxidil so I guess it would be stemoxydine even though again I know this is mild).
 
Last edited:
Top