- Reaction score
- 1,336
Yes but how many of us there are?Those who have been months with Pegasus protocol (Ru, estriol , SW , way , chir ect.... , not including SAG) are having regrowth or al least stop hair loss ¿?
Yes but how many of us there are?Those who have been months with Pegasus protocol (Ru, estriol , SW , way , chir ect.... , not including SAG) are having regrowth or al least stop hair loss ¿?
HI pegasus2,
I'm thinking about adding SAG to my protocol for a diffuse thinning Androgenetic Alopecia, but my point is about dosage, schedule and, in turn, cost, efficacy, safety.
How did you come to the dosage for SAG of 0.15%, 2 ml per day? Is it coming from your contacts that used it in the past?
In the study on mouse model, they used a really low concentration of 0.6 microg/microL and 25 microL solution in acetone 95% and DMSO 5%, even at single dose ,on an area the looks like 3-5 cm2. Induction ramped up for 5 days and lasted at least further 5 days. The authors commented they think there was a sort of lag for Shh induction due cell activation; SAG didn't go systemic.The same study run a test on excised fetal skin, daily application, % increased up to 0.15 microg/microL, but 8 microL and unknown air exposed area, nor the dosing rationale has been argumented.
But you have reported SAG EC/I50 curve, also with cyclopamine as inhibitor,showing a gauss-like behaviour, with inhibition of the activation at microM concentrations. As speculation for dosage, I have googled for mouse skin thickness and found something like 0.5 mm vs the 2.5-3.5 mm of human scalp skin, so factor 5-6X.
This is my math as backcalculation of the dosage of 0.15%, 2 ml.
They used approx 5 microL/cm2 ,15 microg total dose, so 3 microg/cm2
By assuming factor 5.5 because of human skin thickness, 150 cm2 application area, the dose would be 3X5.5X150=2475 microg, so 2.5 mg or 2 ml at 0.125%.
What is the reason for using it more than once in a 2 weeks Follica-like protocol?
I have to get chir and SW ... , at the moment I´m with the restYes but how many of us there are?
Most of the minoxidil sides are probably mediated by upregulation of PGF2a.
I had terrible facial bloating when I was using topical minoxidil 4 times a day. I didn't get it as badly from oral minoxidil, but I was using a diuretic along with it. PGE2 or minoxidil, pick your poison. I wouldn't even hazard a guess as to which one will be worse on your skin.
.25mg is nothing. I doubt that doctor is seeing better results with that than 5% topical except in topical non-responders.
any update on reversal of oral minoxidil sides @pegasus2 ?
I just looked at some photos of my forehead about 3 months apart while I've been on oral min. it's official, my skin looks like sh*t. It's hard to describe exactly how it's just like less youthful, less consistently colored, and like less voluminous. Forehead veins are more pronounced etc. Starting to think about getting off it also. I don't feel like I ever responded topical minoxidil though, would you say you were a topical min responder?
Also probably doesn't help that a couple weeks ago I added PGE2, SW, and PGF2A to my topical. By the book that combo should be pretty terrible for skin correct? Just want to know what I'm getting into.
Unfortunately eplerenone is barely soluble in DMSO so I haven't bothered to use it topically yet. I think it would be quite potent topically. Hopefully we can get finerenone soon, it's more potent than eplerenone, smaller, and more soluble.
Epleronone also inhibits collagen production, so I stopped taking that orally as well. I'm using 5mg/day topically.
Yep minoxidil works but it’s a shame it turns me into Mick JaggerHaving used minoxidil on and off, I have confirmed now over the past couple years that I can't really maintain a good facial texture on it. It seems to kind of dry out and lose collagen right away. I will notice this problem in the gym mirrors with the bad lighting. I start to look like Sting, only without the catalogue of adult rock treasures (yet). I supplement colllagen ever day and use a dermapen on the face. I find its effects very fleeting on the face, but because it brightens you up a good deal every fortnight, I tend to think this can slow aging a good deal.
In spring I switched to Reviv hair serum with the gray reversal and triaminodil (sp) added. So it has all the necessary components for mild cases like mine with a prior FUE done. Nothing has changed with this, good or bad. No reason to change products then for another year or so.
DMSO. You can't dissolve much.What vehicle do you use for topical Epleronone?
That's what I'm been doing atm, and so far it is working out.Wow! Insane recovery? Is it possible for you now to leave everything and continue with AAs? Topical RU and oral Duta? Just for maintenence!?
Also... I have a few questions. Can I PM you?
I can't understand whats RSPO2/3 and what it has to do with hair loss. Kinda new to this topic.That's what I'm been doing atm, and so far it is working out.
Sure, I don't mind
Solubility: DMSO: 2 mg/mL, clear (warmed)DMSO. You can't dissolve much.
Unless you are transitioning, you should wait for that.RSPO2/3 are proteins that maintain Wnt signaling, which is what makes hair grow.
17 is a little young for finasteride. You haven't finished maturing yet.
Ok and those proteins are where!? Ig thats the chemical WAY...? Right?RSPO2/3 are proteins that maintain Wnt signaling, which is what makes hair grow.
17 is a little young for finasteride. You haven't finished maturing yet.
I would first finish biology101 if I were you broOk and those proteins are where!? Ig thats the chemical WAY...? Right?
Dinoprost is basically the same thing as latanoprost. PGE2 and PGE1 may bind to the same receptors, but they exert opposite effects on them. PGE2 is more potent, and it's stable enough to last two weeks in non-aqueous solutions, which is all I need.Very compelling results But why you decided to choose PGE2 over latanoprost? Isn't latanoprost more effective and stable in solutions? Or others analogues of PGE2 or PGE1 (like misoprostol) since PGE1 activate PGE2 receptors anyway. Bioidentical prostaglandins have shorter half-life in vivo (and in vitro) than analogues.