- Reaction score
- 1,623
The two studies conducted are the one om Areata by Brotzu alone and the other one is this one on Androgenetic Alopecia. Fun fact, the areata one was not a professional/scientific study because at the end of the Androgenetic Alopecia study, in the conclusions, they wrote "it's needed a comparison between this lotion and the other therapies, as well as new studies on different forms of hair loss, such as Alopecia Areata". So the lotion is not going to be marketed as a Areata remedy, but I think that is due to keep it a cosmetic; Areata is a "proper" pathology in medicine unlike Androgenetic, so anything that could treat a pathology cannot be marketed as a cosmetic.@The 7TH Sense
You mentioned in another comment that there were 2 6-month trials and one of them was in 2016. So, when was the second trail ? and which trial's report did you read ?
Another thing, what was Fidia doing in the whole 2017 and 1st half of 2018 ? Please dont tell me they spent 6 months for trial and 1.5 years for stability issue ?
Is there any trichogram, hair count, etc. included in the report ?
Other than the "age" and "6-month" problem, what were the things in their study make you think it was delusional ? If they truly offer maintenance, shouldnt it be worth a try ?
As far as I know, Fidia used 2017 to elaborate the study and to obtain the 3-years shelf life for the lotion. Brotzu senior told that they encountered many stability problems. That makes me question why they published a study if there were indeed these problems at that time.
The study is delusional basically for the age of subjects, regrowth and rethickening results; but the worst part is that they felt like they "ignored" these facts and said in the conclusions this remedy is effective because it stops the hairs from falling. It's like when you got a group laboratory research project at school, you and your mates fucked it up and tried to write a positive study out of it trying to trick the professor.
Hairs are described as "more robust", "more shining", "stronger", "more luscious", "more vital" but frankly I don't really know what this means.
It's like Brotzu went to a cancer congress and said he discovered a revolutionary treatment, but when he showed the data he said that tumor mass and volume remained the same, but the patients themselves felt "more energic", "more alive", "overall better"...
But yeah, if it does offer maintenance it's pure gold. I would have tried it anyways if it didn't cost so much, just for the sake of knowing if I have to go bald or not since I cannot tolerate finasteride and just fornthe sake of putting an end to this odissey that I'm following everyday since 2 years.
That equation is trash since the lotion is a cosmetic. I'll now sh*t on everyone who bashed me back in the day when I always remembered the cosmetic/drug difference. If this was a drug, your logic could have had sense, because pharmacologic trials are done to confirm efficacy even over the other treatments already existing.It still remains that trinov is coming out and being sold in mass quantities. If it were a complete scam it would not be coming out and mass marketed it is that simple.
Millions of dollars in branding, production, and marketing + lotion that doesn't work = A huge loss of money
As far as we know, fidia could really be launching this product just to make profit from the initial hype. Who f*****g needs a 3 years shelf life for bottles of 30 ml if this was going to be a such breaktrough in hair loss remedies?
@Royaume
Bro, I totally agree with your Beps' insults, he is really one of a kind, the Discord gang knows what I think about him and how many times I bashed him these months after all the blatant lies he told to Clockwise, cavallopazzo and other people in contact with him. If you read the Discord, you would be on a flight to Cagliari to burn down his house. I bet it.
Oh and sorry for getting your IESON account banned. LMFAO