You can say that only after you test it.
Italian Hair Loss Lotion To Hit The Market In 2016
- Thread starter paleocapa89
- Start date
It feels so strange that this is coming out in a month. Can't help, but hope for it to work. It would be great if it actually does something not only for the joy of it actually working, but also to give a glimmer of hope that things are actually moving forward for the treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia. If it does something it would be the first treatment after years of just hope.
- Reaction score
- 479
Brotzu himself could outright say it's a scam before it's released and some people here would respond "can't know for sure until we test it ourselves" and 6 months later say "I definitely see some regrowth but my hair loss is too aggressive so it didn't work for me, hope others have some luck!!!"
- Reaction score
- 48
As an individual that sincerely (unfortunately) doubts that Trinov will be capable of providing even short-term maintenance, I find comments like these jarring, there’s no need to laud it over those that remain convinced of the product’s efficacy, doing so accomplishes nothing other than feeding your self-satisfaction.
- Reaction score
- 387
Where do you even purchase it? Quick google search showed nothing but threads and news.
There really is a need in some way. Call bullshit where bullshit is; don't sit there and try to polish the turd. Call Fidia and Brotzu out for handling this whole thing the way they have. Brotzu has made claims that seem, based on what we've been benevolently bequeathed today, to quite literally hint at delusions if you're not willing to explain them as attempts to deliberately scam people. Fidia puts out a statement that you can't even find on their site anymore. They claimed their study demonstrated proper efficacy when it quite literally says otherwise--but, then again, I guess it depends on how you define 'proper efficiency'.
God dammit I wanna come to this thread and be proven f*****g wrong. I really do. But people who go along with this are willfully blind.
- Reaction score
- 48
There’s a difference between the comment that the 7thSense made earlier in the thread and the comments that acbrantlin repeatedly makes; the former is designed to provide a reasoned opinion that is capable of informing, the latter are designed primarily to mock, if you see no difference between the two then that is up to you, it is, I would argue, shortsighted.
We weren't talking about the difference between the two, you charlatan. We were talking about whether or not there is justification for extolling one sort of opinion--a critical one--over those that repeatedly make excuses for Fidia or for Brotzu to hold onto some sort of hope. And the reasoned opinion by the person you cite really exalts one over the other. I still have hope, and I can admit that while being critical. I can also admit I'm a damned fool for it, too.
- Reaction score
- 48
Jimm, if you’re going to use a thesaurus use a dictionary also, would you? Charlatan: A person falsely claiming to have a special knowledge or skill. The word you were looking for was perhaps equivocator (?) - even that is a clunky fit. Regardless, I was quite clearly talking about a particular variety of comment, not about critical opinion in general.
Hopefully we can grab a drink sometime when all this hairloss business is over. I’d like to have the chance to hit you with a dictionary, you charlatan.
- Reaction score
- 48
If that means that we can have a significant remedy for this whole thing then I’ll buy the first round. I’ll bring my thesaurus too.
Good deal. You could use it now while we wait. Look up ‘charlatan’ in there, refer back to the original post where I’d used it, and really try to dig deep into your brain and interpret the context—be sure and read as hard as you can. Brains molder, you know. <3
- Reaction score
- 461
Lol! This guy is probably the youngest, yet most mature, guy on this forum XD
- Reaction score
- 461
Can someone please post the study?
Those I-talians make it out like it's a bit hard to get at, themselves. Some here claim to have access to the full, though.
I hope not. All I see is an abstract for a study. There's a link for a PDF but it doesn't open for me.
- Reaction score
- 48
Jimm, you misused a word, it was, quite simply, not applicable in that context. But hey, guess what? That’s ok! You’ve learned something and you’ll continue to do so. That’s the whole point. And if you couple that thesaurus with a dictionary well, watch out world, Jimm’s about to become someone that knows what he’s talking about! I’ll leave it there, this isn’t the place for repartee or as you (using the thesaurus but not the dictionary) might say, satire.
it is, contains 22 pages. And in this study they state many times that further studies should be carried out to investigate the effectiveness.