Italian Hair Loss Lotion To Hit The Market In 2016

[disfiguredyoungman]

Do they naturally gain a little more hair? like in the photos.

There's one low quality male picture that implies that. A single one. Assuming they did not use any shenanigans which would be easy with such a shitty picture.

The study does not indicate any regrowth as far as I remember. Guy could just be a genetic freak.

 

[JLC]

What study is this?? what OFFICIAL STUDY from Fidia has claimed zero regrowth?

 

[Arrade]

There's one low quality male picture that implies that. A single one. Assuming they did not use any shenanigans which would be easy with such a shitty picture.

The study does not indicate any regrowth as far as I remember. Guy could just be a genetic freak.

Genetic freak LOL. So your supposition is that he has mutated genes and that's why he got regrowth from S eqoul

 

[Notorious90]

I don't post much but seeing retards like this get shot down deserves a post looool

 

[disfiguredyoungman]

Genetic freak LOL. So your supposition is that he has mutated genes and that's why he got regrowth from S eqoul

Telogen Effluvium is another explanation. That or forged pictures. Either way his contribution was not statistically significant enough to warrant the claim of regrowth is all you gotta know.

 

[acbrantlin]

What study is this?? what OFFICIAL STUDY from Fidia has claimed zero regrowth?

No placebo group is already a HUGE red flag. Virtually no increase in total number of hairs, so how could the photos show any regrowth? The answer is simple: They don't. You don't even need the data to see that the regrowth is just an illusion.

I won't understate the increase in anagen count, but it still doesn't add up.
They analyzed a 0.78cm² area.
Male: 144 total
Anagen: 64
Telogen: 35
64+35 = 99. Where are the other 45 hairs? They're not all in catagen, that's for f*****g sure.

Not to mention there's no f*****g way that bald *** dude has 144 hairs in a 0.78cm² area, even including invisible vellus hairs.

 

[JLC]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371981

 

[acbrantlin]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371981

Yes they say that in the study, then post the data which doesn't even match their words. Significantly increased for women and marginally increased for men, yet both male and female only show +2 hair count after 6 months? Doesn't make sense.

 

[hairloss_user]

Because Fidia are a bunch of f*****g idiots.

 

[NW2.5372846]

Because those photos were part of the study Fidia did. They said there was no increase in hair count for males, so those photos cannot possibly have regrowth. How hard of a concept is that to get through your skull? Not to mention wet hair can definitely do that. You must not be balding if you don't know the difference between how wet hair looks and dry.

I actually understand why the study specified that there wasn't an increase in hair count and why this lotion might still be a success:

1) The lotion thickens up minituarized hair, it doesn't awaken dormant follicles (I don't think brotzu ever claimed that anyway)
2) It's marketed as an anti hairfall lotion. So it's mainly going to be a maintenance product, just like finasteride.

 

[acbrantlin]

S

I actually understand why the study specified that there wasn't an increase in hair count and why this lotion might still be a success:

1) The lotion thickens up minituarized hair, it doesn't awaken dormant follicles (I don't think brotzu ever claimed that anyway)
2) It's marketed as an anti hairfall lotion. So it's mainly going to be a maintenance product, just like finasteride.

The study also showed the change in hair diameter was statistically insignificant, so unfortunately there was no thickening of miniaturized hairs.

 

[Headdy]

Sorry actually ignore above post, that male one you can see an improvement.

I think you were actually right
No improvement with the male.

Zoom is different.
Hair length is different.
In the "before" pic the hair is wet.

 

[Headdy]

Why buy this with these being their best or even average cases?
What about the 5 years regrowth claim?
5 years my ***

 

[hairloss_user]

Looks like the train quickly derailed again, lmao. Well until next time.

 

[hailbrotzu]

how do we know that that is the official study?

 

[ZenHead]

Haven’t read this thread in about 50 or so pages, nice to see this dumpster fire is still burning red hot with the same people arguing the same points. Can’t wait for people to actually try this out so we can all shut the f*** up

 

[br1]

Photos from the press release. I believe we've seen them before.

https://www.folliclethought.com/trinov-arrival-press-release-new-photos/

View attachment 105934

Looooooooooool

 

[Arrade]

Considering that Brotzu always claimed regrowth of what is lost the past 5 years, these middle aged men may have such progressive fibrosis and not lost any ground in five recent years to really profit from the lotion.

That chart is depressing. This isn't much of a study though, 6 months long and only for cosmetic purposes.
True test being a 20 yr old using it for a year

 

[Arrade]

A vellus hair that has only shrunk in the past year may have growth potential, but the heavily fibrosed scalp of a 40 year old is like watering gravel

 

[BinguBoyX]

To spoon, or be spooned by Lord Brotzu is one could ever hope for to happen to one self in life.