How many needles will your 3.0mm have?
I have a 3.0mm with 192 needles here. I have not dared using it with real pressure yet.
I'm a bit scared it might puncture some large artery on the scalp and I'll end up having to go to the ER, and explain to them why I have been trying to commit suicide with a dermaroller. (I'd never admit to the true reason :unsure
I had heard some stuff about peelers, very interesting. So I have to ask, if you were given the peeler for you acne, how did it end up on your temples? Did you use a bit there out of curiosity or where the acne marks close to your temples?
So you say they were not permanent, were you on finasteride when you saw that regrowth? Maybe the DHT Killed it like any other hair and if one is on finasteride, one can keep them.
I do not know, sorry...but I did order a peel over the net and am going to try it on a small area of my temples in combination with minoxidil.I think that it's worth a try, I would give it a shot on a small piece of scalp to get it out. Do you know the
Percentage you were given?
if ur skin is thin on the temples and needs to be thicker why dont we use emu/jojoba oil then after rolling etc? I guess these oils are pretty good in rebuilding fat cells
there is not way to roll the entire 2.5mm all the way in, at least not for me. When I press hard and tried to roll, the actual pins would get stuck on my skin, and had to apply some force to get them out.
Lastly, this is all experimentation, so maybe once we regrow the hair and are on finasteride, we don't have to roll, if not on finasteride, you might have to roll till you die.
i don't know about arteries but i was watching a bodybuilding video the other day and noticed that some of these guys have big swollen veins popping through their scalps. they are big and visible. i don't know how deep those veins are and if it's possible to puncture one with the dermaroller. I hope not.
Why don't you just stick with the Indian study? Or do like me which is to make the Indian study more consistent by inserting just 1.0mm but all the way in, as opposed to 1.5mm superficially ?
1mm is a waste of time, even going all the way in.
I think the best length would have been 2.0mm, but I'm an idiot and ordered two 2.5mm instead of one of each.
They didn't actually specify in the study how far they inserted the needles into the scalp, nor did they state any scientific reason for using the 1.5mm size.
Well you may be right about the study not going in the entire 1.5mm. It is actually very difficult to go all the way in, you actually have to put in some force and I doubt they took the time to press one at a time. Anyways, I now know that 2.5mm is simply too damn deep, I can still feel the small artery I opened, you will feel it and it's not pleasant. Lots sort of a pumping feeling in the actual artery. I would like to go in about 2mm but it's too hard to tell how far you're in if you're a diffuse thinner.Exactly. And considering it's a business, and the pain it generates, they certainly didn't insert the 1.5mm needles all the way in the scalp of their patients.
My fear is to pierce the galea throughout for months or years and eventually stay with thousands of pieces of this tissue no longer connected to anything and getting necrosed with time. Overall we're playing with fire here and I prefer to play it safe.
1.00mm fully entered is the way to go for me. That also means less pain and therefore increased psychological motivation to dermaroll longer (and therefore making more small wounds) during one session.
Well you may be right about the study not going in the entire 1.5mm. It is actually very difficult to go all the way in, you actually have to put in some force and I doubt they took the time to press one at a time. Anyways, I now know that 2.5mm is simply too damn deep, I can still feel the small artery I opened, you will feel it and it's not pleasant. Lots sort of a pumping feeling in the actual artery. I would like to go in about 2mm but it's too hard to tell how far you're in if you're a diffuse thinner.
I will just try to roll now and later will try to order the 2mm.
Does anyone know if the arteries are combined with the fibrosis tissue? Or is it under it.
Well you may be right about the study not going in the entire 1.5mm. It is actually very difficult to go all the way in, you actually have to put in some force and I doubt they took the time to press one at a time. Anyways, I now know that 2.5mm is simply too damn deep, I can still feel the small artery I opened, you will feel it and it's not pleasant. Lots sort of a pumping feeling in the actual artery. I would like to go in about 2mm but it's too hard to tell how far you're in if you're a diffuse thinner.
I will just try to roll now and later will try to order the 2mm.
Does anyone know if the arteries are combined with the fibrosis tissue? Or is it under it.
Just wanted to post this.
This should cut down on the time it takes to do the whole scalp. I have to do top, crown, temples - all the classic male pattern baldness areas. Takes forever with the 192 needle one that I have.
However, I had read some time ago that the 192 needle roller is recommended over the higher needle count ones. Why? I forgot... :blush:
I just recall there was a good reason. I ordered a 192 needle roller because of this.
I should point out that I read this at a place where they talk about rolling for collagen regeneration. This had nothing to do with the Indian study - or hair for that matter.
For the life of me, I cannot recall why they said 192 is better than the 540 needle one.
I will post again if I remember it.
Maybe someone reading this can chyme in.
But I guess if we can make it bleed with this, we should be alright?
Because 540 acts a meat slicer! just never roll at the same area a 1000xx times and you are good to go. Just need to be smart with the tool. I know is tough for some people on here LOL
Well not a main artery, but def some small ones. I am not lying, you will feel the vessel open, well at least on the crown I felt it. So the scalp doesn't have the potential for major blood loss? Are we able to reach the actual skull without bleeding to death?You scalp is soft tissue only.. No friggin MAIN arteries there LOL! I don't go all the way in with the 2.5mm everywhere on the scalp..
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/834808-overview
So... who's willing to inject or topically apply FGF-9 after wounding and replicate Follica's method?
You guys are effin' nuts...
- - - Updated - - -
stick with 1.5mm...you're actually thinking that you're accurate to 0.5mm??
1.5mm hurts god-damn enough, thank you very much