This does not mean it's new hair growing from the needle puncture. The hair on squeegees pic is not new hair, it might be existing vellus hair that the needle happen to puncture at the exact same location, and they are growing from the growth factor released by WIHN, which is excellent news. But the fact is we have 100,000+ hair on our scalp, when you dermaroll you likely create tens of thousands of holes and you are doing this weekly, obviously some of those puncture holes will be on top of existing hair holes, this is simply the law of averages, sorry this isn't new hair induced by WIHN.. What you guys are concluding from these images is like throwing darts at a wall and then painting targets around them...Dont lose heart PrincessRambo.
What have we seen so far? From the Original study and from posters with results in this thread and other posts elsewhere like you say we know rolling is doing something positive.
regenerating hair ? I dont know.
But what about some of the result pics that appear to show new growth growing directly from the needle puncture sites ?
This does not mean it's new hair growing from the needle puncture. The hair on squeegees pic is not new hair, it might be existing vellus hair that the needle happen to puncture at the exact same location, and they are growing from the growth factor released by WIHN, which is excellent news. But the fact is we have 100,000 hair on our scalp, when you dermaroll you likely create tens of thousands of holes and you are doing this weekly, obviously some of those puncture holes will be on top of existing hair holes, this is simply the law of averages, sorry this isn't new hair induced by WIHN.. What you guys are concluding from these images is like shootings darts on a wall and then painting targets around them...
Great so now dermarolling does not work like in the study? Is dermarolling useless? How come those people in the study got such great results? I HATE male pattern baldness
But that dude has no before pics...
I am going to peel and roll starting next week!
Who ever said it doesn't work like in the study? What study? The indian study? Yes it works in that context, in fact it works exellent... noone said it was useless in that context. arghhhGreat so now dermarolling does not work like in the study? Is dermarolling useless? How come those people in the study got such great results? I HATE male pattern baldness
Armando! What was your theory again? I am buying chemical peels online as I type this. I really think that Fibrosis is the real b**ch in Androgen Alopecia after looking at my own results with the derma roller. Hair are coming out of the punctured area only. People having success with TCA peels on the immortal forum. We almost there!
- - - Updated - - -
Good stuff Jorged!:salut:
Aren't you risking causing too much damage by doing both?
What will be your schedule? How many days between rolling and doing peels?
I've also considered doing peels, but came to the conclusion - for now - that it would be too dangerous doing both within the same 3 week time frame.
But now I'm thinking maybe rolling Friday, then wait 7 days (next Friday), do a hardcore peel, then wait until next Friday, roll again.
I read the skin takes 10 days to recover from a TCA peel. But that 'recovery' is only in so far that the old skin has now peeled off. It it still very sensitive, and not ready for another peel for another 3-4 weeks (IIRC). Doing heavy rolling during this time might be a bad idea... or it might just be what we need. :shock:
See, I kept saying about chemical peels and you blew me off and now you're all on board. Oh well, link us to the other forum thread? Or is it a private forum?
Is everyone here just planing to roll for 3 months and then stop and wait for the results? Or are some people going to continue rolling after 3 months?
I think I'm just gonna do it for 3 months and then stop.
Hey guys LEARN CONTEXT from what is posted here or else your brain work can be done by a computer!!! i am tired of people misinterpreting RAMBO by taking stuff out of context!
I don't know. For most people, three months is just not time enough to see signifcant results, so I think we should keep going if we really want to see something. On the other hand, if you DO see results... why would you stop?. If you get something and just stop, then it would be just a matter of time before you get back into square one once again...
Yeah true, it's just that the pictures on the trial were supposedly taken months after the DR sessions took place. So maybe it's best to stop after 3 months and then wait for the results to develop? Just wanted to know what everybody's plans were, anyone else?
I think for myself and I don't focus all my energy and knowledge towards follica's patent . so shut the **** up. People pitching new ideas to the tread are ****ing awesome! Keep an open mind. If you are not happy GTFO! Understood KaranKan?
I think for myself and I don't focus all my energy and knowledge towards follica's patent . so shut the **** up. People pitching new ideas to the tread are ****ing awesome! Keep an open mind. If you are not happy GTFO! Understood KaranKan?
I was not talking to you! And again putting **** ten times in your sentence does not help your argument! and i do not think anyone here is focusing all the energy and knowledge towards follica's patent, it is all being said in a CONTEXT....You do not ****ing own this forum so you GTFO... and i am not amazed that after 2574 posts here after all the "new" ideas you have "absorbed", you still have not found a solution...