Sick Of Seeing Idiots Claiming Nw2s Don't Have A Right To Complain

[infinitepain]

LOL, just be a world-famous painter. When will these copers learn?

Anyway, the op is wrong. NW4 is the cutoff (provided you have density). Anything up to that will let you smash even with prime dimes if it's properly styled. It won't happen by itself and you'll have to work for it but it is possible.

Yes, you can definitely f*** hot 17 year old with a NW3

kys COPERS

 

[rclark]

Norwood twos DO have the right to complain.

But if your not complaining to a Norwood one or lower, SHUT THE f*** UP.

 

[That Guy]

Here's the thing no one ever tells you about NW2

How it looks is dependent on how high your hairline originally was situated. Some people naturally just have higher, rounder hairlines and sharply-defined temples and Norwood 2 easily looks like NW3 in such cases; the balding is much more apparent.

If your hairline was low enough that you wind up with Jamie Lannister hair (f*** spelling whatever his real name is), you're in the clear; sh*t, I'd go as far to say that in some cases it may even be preferable to NW1. If you're NW2, high hairline to begin with and diffuse, it's going to look much worse.

NW2 done right:

This motherfucker's hair was voted sexiest man alive.

NW2, not going quite as well:

Not quite sure why the f*** Jyrki is in a bathtub in this new poster, but note the temples. The frontal part of his hairline hasn't moved back by any noticeable amount, but the sharp angle of balding at the temples, coupled with what was a round hairline to begin with makes the effects much more prominent and looks much more "old man".

Still not horrible, but definitely having more negative effects than other NW2s. But this guy enjoyed the rockstar life, the hottest women and full hair well into his 40s.

 

[That Guy]

Milla Jovovich is NW2

I'd still hit it

 

[kj6723]

OP needs to see a psychiatrist asap

 

[Dontwannabeabetabob]

Oh sweet another thread where people are saying "hey I'm more bald than you!" Just LOL.

 

[blackg]

OP needs to see a psychiatrist asap

That's a cheap shot. The OP has a legitimate concern.
It's all relative, son.

 

[karankaran]

I am probably balder than anyone here. I am NW5 with my crown almost completely gone. I cannot afford a hair transplant yet.

But I totally understand that NW2-NW3 will not look at a NW5 but look at NW0-NW1 and wish they were like them. That is human tendency - to look at what you can have instead of what would have been.

I look towards NW2s with great envy. If minoxidil and finasteride can get me there which is highly improbable, I will be content. My hairline thankfully is NW2 - which is weird because my crown loss is NW5. If I can get my crown just barely covered, I will be happy. I wish I could get a hair transplant now but I want to get it from the best doctor who charges 5.5$ per graft. And I do not have that kind of money given I would need a minimum of 2000 grafts.

 

[Rudiger]

Some people just love to blame baldness on their shortcomings. If you're past even early 20's, 23/24 years old, and you aren't completely baby faced, NW2 is fine, you definitely aren't seen as a bald guy, and if not diffused or island pattern forming, you aren't even seen as balding. Your main concern isn't being NW2, it's whether it gets worse from here (and for a lot of guys it doesn't, they stay at NW2, and if you're on treatments then you have a damn good chance).

So a guy talking about NW2 most likely can't get laid because of his looks or crappy personality, and if he is getting laid, then he's blaming baldness on why he doesn't get better looking women. And if he's getting the best looking women, then he's just insane and bored of slaying prime pussy.

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

Some people just love to blame baldness on their shortcomings. If you're past even early 20's, 23/24 years old, and you aren't completely baby faced, NW2 is fine, you definitely aren't seen as a bald guy, and if not diffused or island pattern forming, you aren't even seen as balding. Your main concern isn't being NW2, it's whether it gets worse from here (and for a lot of guys it doesn't, they stay at NW2, and if you're on treatments then you have a damn good chance).

So a guy talking about NW2 most likely can't get laid because of his looks or crappy personality, and if he is getting laid, then he's blaming baldness on why he doesn't get better looking women. And if he's getting the best looking women, then he's just insane and bored of slaying prime pussy.

Personality.

 

[sunchyme1]

I am probably balder than anyone here. I am NW5 with my crown almost completely gone. I cannot afford a hair transplant yet.

But I totally understand that NW2-NW3 will not look at a NW5 but look at NW0-NW1 and wish they were like them. That is human tendency - to look at what you can have instead of what would have been.

I look towards NW2s with great envy. If minoxidil and finasteride can get me there which is highly improbable, I will be content. My hairline thankfully is NW2 - which is weird because my crown loss is NW5. If I can get my crown just barely covered, I will be happy. I wish I could get a hair transplant now but I want to get it from the best doctor who charges 5.5$ per graft. And I do not have that kind of money given I would need a minimum of 2000 grafts.

how old r u man?

 

[JohnsonDDG]

Some people just love to blame baldness on their shortcomings. If you're past even early 20's, 23/24 years old, and you aren't completely baby faced, NW2 is fine, you definitely aren't seen as a bald guy, and if not diffused or island pattern forming, you aren't even seen as balding. Your main concern isn't being NW2, it's whether it gets worse from here (and for a lot of guys it doesn't, they stay at NW2, and if you're on treatments then you have a damn good chance).

So a guy talking about NW2 most likely can't get laid because of his looks or crappy personality, and if he is getting laid, then he's blaming baldness on why he doesn't get better looking women. And if he's getting the best looking women, then he's just insane and bored of slaying prime pussy.

Pretty much agree - my crutch when I was young was that I was too nice to get laid.

In fairness, I was too shy to get laid. I barely approached 5 women until I was 24. I came out of my shell a lot more around 25 and made up for lost time.

 

[Exodus2011]

Some people just love to blame baldness on their shortcomings. If you're past even early 20's, 23/24 years old, and you aren't completely baby faced, NW2 is fine, you definitely aren't seen as a bald guy, and if not diffused or island pattern forming, you aren't even seen as balding. Your main concern isn't being NW2, it's whether it gets worse from here (and for a lot of guys it doesn't, they stay at NW2, and if you're on treatments then you have a damn good chance).

So a guy talking about NW2 most likely can't get laid because of his looks or crappy personality, and if he is getting laid, then he's blaming baldness on why he doesn't get better looking women. And if he's getting the best looking women, then he's just insane and bored of slaying prime pussy.

your personality isn't crappy just because women aren't turned on by it. vast majority of women would be turned off by my personality because i'm very sensitive but in a general context its extremely helpful. i can empathize well with it and know how to be as nice as possible.

 

[Dante92]

Personality.

Leave it to good-looking bluepilled fullheads to believe in personality.

 

[Rudiger]

Personality.

Ah please, I'm not going to start going into the "looks Vs personality" merry go round I've been sucked into countless times on here.

Looks are very important initially, personality plays a role quickly as well. Is personality as important? Over all no I don't believe so, but in some cases yes, there's no need to get so black or white about it.

I've known legit 9/10 Chad's who were useless with women, I mean chicks would be there practically on a plate, but he'd manage to f*** it up. Not even necessarily by being totally autistic, but just not having a free flowing and flirty vibe for literally the 2mins she gave him and she'd get bored and that'd be it.

Of course people will argue "well if she really wanted the D she would've applied herself more as women do" but I've seen it too many times, even felt it myself when a girl was interested but I was feeling anxious or introverted for some reason.

And the opposite side of this? The amount of times I, or guys I've known, have punched above their weight with a girl who was in no way interested, but after lengthy discussion was won around.

Sorry Bateman but I legit think a lot of the "personality??!? HA" dudes don't have a clue how to talk to women, not to get personal but I feel this is normally the case. No doubt shitty aesthetics can make personality irrelevant, but the same thing can happen with shitty personality making aesthetics irrelevant, everything is a bit more complicated than how you view it. An average looking guy who can talk to girls, make them laugh, appear fun and popular, will obviously stand a better chance than the exact same average guy who's in the corner staring at his shoes.

Pretty much agree - my crutch when I was young was that I was too nice to get laid.

In fairness, I was too shy to get laid. I barely approached 5 women until I was 24. I came out of my shell a lot more around 25 and made up for lost time.

Too shy probably, too nice can be harmful as well.

Only true aesthetic God's can get away with being a total arrogant douche and women will still love it, but we can't be too vanilla either. It's boring. It also says to women "he'd be a nice boyfriend for a friend of mine maybe" not "I want him to take me home and bend me over the couch".

So if you're a total dick you won't get anywhere but you have to not be a door mat either and show you're a real person with challenging thoughts, there's a bit of dominance required.

your personality isn't crappy just because women aren't turned on by it. vast majority of women would be turned off by my personality because i'm very sensitive but in a general context its extremely helpful. i can empathize well with it and know how to be as nice as possible.

It's a good distinction so just to be clear, I mean crappy personality in terms of chatting up women. Like the aforementioned Chad's, these were/are my friends, and genuinely nice people, funny, interesting, all that sh*t, and they don't represent any of it when they nervously make no sense babbling to women uncomfortably.

 

[JohnsonDDG]

Ah please, I'm not going to start going into the "looks Vs personality" merry go round I've been sucked into countless times on here.

Looks are very important initially, personality plays a role quickly as well. Is personality as important? Over all no I don't believe so, but in some cases yes, there's no need to get so black or white about it.

I've known legit 9/10 Chad's who were useless with women, I mean chicks would be there practically on a plate, but he'd manage to f*** it up. Not even necessarily by being totally autistic, but just not having a free flowing and flirty vibe for literally the 2mins she gave him and she'd get bored and that'd be it.

Of course people will argue "well if she really wanted the D she would've applied herself more as women do" but I've seen it too many times, even felt it myself when a girl was interested but I was feeling anxious or introverted for some reason.

And the opposite side of this? The amount of times I, or guys I've known, have punched above their weight with a girl who was in no way interested, but after lengthy discussion was won around.

Sorry Bateman but I legit think a lot of the "personality??!? HA" dudes don't have a clue how to talk to women, not to get personal but I feel this is normally the case. No doubt shitty aesthetics can make personality irrelevant, but the same thing can happen with shitty personality making aesthetics irrelevant, everything is a bit more complicated than how you view it. An average looking guy who can talk to girls, make them laugh, appear fun and popular, will obviously stand a better chance than the exact same average guy who's in the corner staring at his shoes.



Too shy probably, too nice can be harmful as well.

Only true aesthetic God's can get away with being a total arrogant douche and women will still love it, but we can't be too vanilla either. It's boring. It also says to women "he'd be a nice boyfriend for a friend of mine maybe" not "I want him to take me home and bend me over the couch".

So if you're a total dick you won't get anywhere but you have to not be a door mat either and show you're a real person with challenging thoughts, there's a bit of dominance required.



It's a good distinction so just to be clear, I mean crappy personality in terms of chatting up women. Like the aforementioned Chad's, these were/are my friends, and genuinely nice people, funny, interesting, all that sh*t, and they don't represent any of it when they nervously make no sense babbling to women uncomfortably.

Yeah, unless you are an 8 or over women will not ask you out.

I have one mate who is 6'3 and a solid 8 and I used to see women approach him in bars and cafes.

As for me, I'm around a 6 and have never had anyone ask me out or approach me in a bar. But, being a 6 if I do approach and keep the conversation going then I can get dates.

This is the difference between a 6 and an 8. An 8 doesn't have to try, whereas a 6 can still get laid but has to make the effort.

 

[Rudiger]

Yeah, unless you are an 8 or over women will not ask you out.

I have one mate who is 6'3 and a solid 8 and I used to see women approach him in bars and cafes.

As for me, I'm around a 6 and have never had anyone ask me out or approach me in a bar. But, being a 6 if I do approach and keep the conversation going then I can get dates.

This is the difference between a 6 and an 8. An 8 doesn't have to try, whereas a 6 can still get laid but has to make the effort.

Yeah well just to clarify, 90% of Chad's will get attention from women and not have to try, but even with that gigantic head start, there are still some who somehow manage to consistently f*** it up. So that's what I was referring to.

 

[DoctorHouse]

Sunchyme, you think if good looking women and men hit on a guy, would he have to be at least a 7? Or you think it's higher?

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

Ah please, I'm not going to start going into the "looks Vs personality" merry go round I've been sucked into countless times on here.

Looks are very important initially, personality plays a role quickly as well. Is personality as important? Over all no I don't believe so, but in some cases yes, there's no need to get so black or white about it.

I've known legit 9/10 Chad's who were useless with women, I mean chicks would be there practically on a plate, but he'd manage to f*** it up. Not even necessarily by being totally autistic, but just not having a free flowing and flirty vibe for literally the 2mins she gave him and she'd get bored and that'd be it.

Of course people will argue "well if she really wanted the D she would've applied herself more as women do" but I've seen it too many times, even felt it myself when a girl was interested but I was feeling anxious or introverted for some reason.

And the opposite side of this? The amount of times I, or guys I've known, have punched above their weight with a girl who was in no way interested, but after lengthy discussion was won around.

Sorry Bateman but I legit think a lot of the "personality??!? HA" dudes don't have a clue how to talk to women, not to get personal but I feel this is normally the case. No doubt shitty aesthetics can make personality irrelevant, but the same thing can happen with shitty personality making aesthetics irrelevant, everything is a bit more complicated than how you view it. An average looking guy who can talk to girls, make them laugh, appear fun and popular, will obviously stand a better chance than the exact same average guy who's in the corner staring at his shoes.



Too shy probably, too nice can be harmful as well.

Only true aesthetic God's can get away with being a total arrogant douche and women will still love it, but we can't be too vanilla either. It's boring. It also says to women "he'd be a nice boyfriend for a friend of mine maybe" not "I want him to take me home and bend me over the couch".

So if you're a total dick you won't get anywhere but you have to not be a door mat either and show you're a real person with challenging thoughts, there's a bit of dominance required.



It's a good distinction so just to be clear, I mean crappy personality in terms of chatting up women. Like the aforementioned Chad's, these were/are my friends, and genuinely nice people, funny, interesting, all that sh*t, and they don't represent any of it when they nervously make no sense babbling to women uncomfortably.

You think this guy would get laid by non cows if he had 10/10 personality? (As if it exists.)

In before you say I'm using a extreme. So are you: a Chad who isn't able to ask a girl her name and where she's from/her study/work, then proceed to say variations of that's cool. That's extreme autism, not personality.

Personality in 2017 what a joke. The only people you are making feel even better are the 7/10+ guys who are getting laid with their "EPIC personality". And the guys who get rejected as soon as they say hello feel even worse. gg

 

[sunchyme1]

Sunchyme, you think if good looking women and men hit on a guy, would he have to be at least a 7? Or you think it's higher?

what j said

8plus