UnemployedHow are you on top of these job listings lol?
Always with the insightful comments, what would we do without you?we have no info about what is going on for months.....
I actually like them. They keep things going on xDAlways with the insightful comments, what would we do without you?
They're a bit too repetitive, but each to their own I guess lolI actually like them. They keep things going on xD
I was talking about froggy's constant negativity and hopelessnessSmt not repetetive, I included Stemson to my scientific paper of "stem cell (-research)" xD
We all have some kind of Stemson fanboy vibes in us Ig lol
Dear froggy,I was talking about froggy's constant negativity and hopelessness
InspirationalDear froggy,
hair loss will be cured at some point in the next few decades. Stem cell technology and research is like a train getting faster and faster, which cant be stopped! iPS-breakthrough happened 2006, so not much time between now and then. We should be happy that a fuctional hair loss cure is backed with investors. My only concern is if it will not be as effective for Androgenetic Alopecia as it would be for scarring alopecia (fungi infection/chemotherapy/etc.)
Keep a fresh mind, you dont need to be concernd, at the end its just hair, + you will have it at some point in an amazing condition.
Bye!
Yeah I was just saying that at maximum we will have a(/n) (affordable) cure at some point in the next 20 years (from now - 2041).Wether it will be Stemson or some other company popping out. Hope you get my point.Inspirational
View attachment 163296
Though for Stemson to be successful in a few decades would be highly unlikely. Their whole operation would collapse well before that, they would not receive any more funding from Allergan nor Fortunis. If they are to be successful it would have to be in the coming 3/4 years. Their clinical trials are highly likely to take place next year some time, a few decades for commercialization since the starting of their human clinical trials is impossible my friend.
I see okay I thought you meant it won’t be before decades we see a cure, my bad. I mean $40-$60K wouldn’t be too bad considering what the payoff is, but that obviously is subjective.Yeah I was just saying that at maximum we will have a(/n) (affordable) cure at some point in the next 20 years (from now - 2041).Wether it will be Stemson or some other company popping out. Hope you get my point.
Sure, but it's still much for the majority.I see okay, I mean $40-$60K wouldn’t be too bad considering what the payoff is, but that obviously is subjective.
100% trueInspirational
View attachment 163296
Though for Stemson to be successful in a few decades would be highly unlikely. Their whole operation would collapse well before that, they would not receive any more funding from Allergan nor Fortunis. If they are to be successful it would have to be in the coming 3/4 years. Their clinical trials are highly likely to take place next year some time, a few decades for commercialization since the starting of their human clinical trials is impossible my friend.
Hello, for know, where did you get this price range?I see okay I thought you meant it won’t be before decades we see a cure, my bad. I mean $40-$60K wouldn’t be too bad considering what the payoff is, but that obviously is subjective.
The price has been constantly discussed over and over on this thread, this is my last time rehashing it. Hamilton (the business mind behind Stemson) did say that this is intended for the wider population and not the select few, another point is that this procedure is not going to be successful or last if only a selected number of patients can afford such a procedure. Stemson have also already quoted the number 30k-50k in reference to the market they're looking to capture.Hello, for know, where did you get this price range?
Here's a quote by the great @Pls_NW-1 which makes sense to me.Hello, for know, where did you get this price range?
It is indeed not like they said what their charging range will be. But referring to "bad treatments" (in their pov) and calling them out as costly sounds like; "yeah, our treatment will be definitely curative and not as costly as a normal transplant (in terms of price-performance ratio). Hope this clarifies for you something. Imo we won't see Stemson charging six figures, they want to deliver for the masses, and Cellino can as well provide some good tech, for trying to achieve that.
That's quite the departure from you frequently saying it'd take ~50 years for a cureYeah I was just saying that at maximum we will have a(/n) (affordable) cure at some point in the next 20 years (from now - 2041).Wether it will be Stemson or some other company popping out. Hope you get my point.
Yeah well, I still dont think stemson is an ultimate cure for Androgenetic Alopecia.That's quite the departure from you frequently saying it'd take ~50 years for a cure
But Stemson is primarily designed for androgenetic alopecia?Yeah well, I still dont think stemson is an ultimate cure for Androgenetic Alopecia.
I still need some more informations about their tech.
But, yes, definitely!