- Reaction score
- 135
I already applied and got accepted. I might be taking your boy buzzlighter with me, you two might want to talk it outYou apply?
I already applied and got accepted. I might be taking your boy buzzlighter with me, you two might want to talk it outYou apply?
This applies to the situation where you clone existing follicles, and place them on your head at a later age.If that would be the case, baldness wouldn't exist. The hair follicle gets over time more sensitive due to genetic predisposition. It's like -> aging. The genetic × hormone combo plays a big role.
That's what I'm saying, but what percentage of people who lose their hair lose it at 20~? Maybe 5-10% tops? Actually bald at 19-22? Under 5% for sure.
Anyways, I still don't think it matters. If this literal revolutionary technology works in humans, the last thing people are going to be concerned about is if they need to replicate the process unless that also comes with significant costs. People are just going to be happy that a solution exists if they want one.
The more the process needs to be repeated, the cheaper it will have to be each time anyways.
You might want to consider buzzing it like himI already applied and got accepted. I might be taking your boy buzzlighter with me, you two might want to talk it out
View attachment 163385
If you want a comeback from me you’re gonna have to scrape it out of your mother’s teeth.You might want to consider buzzing it like him
Losing hair is a lot less stressful once you know there is a way to get it back. I actually don't think it would be very stressful at all anymore if you knew you could get this procedure at anytime.I like this positive and hopeful interpretation of their listings.
Yeah I just want there to be a cure first before I start worrying about things like price, durability, etc. Doesn't matter if it's via drugs or hair cloning, and whether it's inconvenient or expensive.
I don't think anyone assumes that the common person could afford 50k out of pocket, but it's something that is achievable to a working professional with saving/financing.I notice that we tend to overestimate peoples' financial situations. Everybody agrees that the price Tsuji wanted to ask was way too high, but to then point towards the ~$50k price tag of Stemson as "being available to the common man" is way too optimistic. Most people live paycheck to paycheck and would be willing and able to pay such amounts only for necessities, such as a car or house, or investments. This treatment is neither.
Most of the people who could afford it, will likely only be able to pay for the procedure once. So if results aren't guaranteed for a lifetime, that should make you rethink the decision to undergo this procedure.
There hasn’t been information released on whether the follicles will be or will not be resist to DHT. You might be thinking of Tsuji’s/Yokohoma method?Why is everyone saying the cloned follicles will be susceptible to DHT?
I thought the whole point was to clone follicles that are not susceptible to DHT (such as the ones on the back of your head), so it is more like an unlimited hair transplant. Or am I misunderstanding the technique?
But aren’t the hair follicles being derived from neural crest? Won’t that mean the follicles would be relatively similar to ones you were born with?The problem is that you assume that stemson will replicate the high quality folicele that created when your born. I doubt that. But i agree it should take a while for the hair to go. I dont think its a problem as long as you can repeat the process
You’re partially correct my man. Hair growth in nude mice transplanted with human iPSC-derived dermal papilla cells that were combined with mouse epithelial cells inside a biodegradable scaffold. The epithelial was that of mice. Also Alexey was saying that the biological part of his procedure was solved, he was now looking into how to create robust hair with the technology. “Terskikh studies a type of cell called dermal papilla. Residing inside the hair follicle, these cells control hair growth, including hair thickness, length and growth cycle.”I look at the hairs that comes out from the mouse...
They look very weird and frizzy . Not human like hair. (And those hair were from human).
Fair enough, but from what I understand you can control the hair length, thickness and growth cycles according to how much dermal papilla you want packed. So it’s up to you really.Just to be clear i wont mind to have this friizzy hair . I would just buzzcut and look good even with that . So in the worth case its still good
Yeah that was just a proof of concept. They're not going to be able to sell their product if the final thing looks like transplanted pubes.You’re partially correct my man. Hair growth in nude mice transplanted with human iPSC-derived dermal papilla cells that were combined with mouse epithelial cells inside a biodegradable scaffold. The epithelial was that of mice. Also Alexey was saying that the biological part of his procedure was solved, he was now looking into how to create robust hair with the technology. “Terskikh studies a type of cell called dermal papilla. Residing inside the hair follicle, these cells control hair growth, including hair thickness, length and growth cycle.”
Exactly what I mean, it needed fine tuning from then all the way to commercialization. That’s why it’s going to be interesting to see proof of concept on pigs to see what kind of improvements have been made in the appearance of the hair follicles. Mainly because of its close proximity to human skin.Yeah that was just a proof of concept. They're not going to be able to sell their product if the final thing looks like transplanted pubes.
When are we supposedly seeing this proof of concept anyway?Exactly what I mean, it needed fine tuning from then all the way to commercialization. That’s why it’s going to be interesting to see proof of concept on pigs to see what kind of improvements have been made in the appearance of the hair follicles. Mainly because of its close proximity to human skin.
Oh ok honestly I thought the methods were similar for Stemson as well. But apparently they create a folliculogenic cell from scratch.You might be thinking of Tsuji’s/Yokohoma method?
That’s the million dollar question that only Alexey and his team would know. But gene knockout does sound extremely pricey.Oh ok honestly I thought the methods were similar for Stemson as well. But apparently they create a folliculogenic cell from scratch.
Now I'm wondering whether it would be possible for them to genetically engineer these cells in vitro to be DHT resistant before transplanting them into our scalps. That would be pretty convenient and we do have the technology for single gene knockouts.
Well you would only need to do it once, and then clone that cell over and over.But gene knockout does sound extremely pricey.
You will literally never be able to grow (perfect) hair. I wouldn't like to do the procedure just for a little grown out buzz cut lol.Does it have to be DHT resistant? If it's cheap and easy to apply, just...do it every few months to offset loss. Better something than nothing.