Stemson is going to use minipigs in the next stage of their hair cloning research

eeyore

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
211
If you think the mouse model means nothing, you don't understand what's happening here. Same goes for Tsuji, that mouse model is not the same as regular hairloss mouse models where they just grow mouse hair on shaved mice. It's cloned human hair on the body of a nude mouse. Alexei (the cofounder who's science this is based on) was the first person to clone a human hair in a lab, period. This sets them apart from basically any other company/process ever except for Tsuji, but these guys are actually funded and organized.

Either way, I'm saying the exact same thing as you. I'm not telling people that this is the end of hairloss and to be overly optimistic. I'm just saying to stop wasting your time/effort debating the process based on single lines of text in an interview. I think Stemson has a really good shot of accomplishing what they set out to, which is to offer us unlimited hair in the future. That future isn't going to be in the next 5~ years though, so don't cling to the idea of them as being some savior to rescue you from your current situation.
You don't think 5 years is possible anymore even for people willing to pay a premium price?
 

DuncanOP

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
29
Nothing new :(
Instead interviewing Hamilton, they should get a interview with Alexey.

He may able to say what they already done in terms of technology and what is the next steps and changelles. It will be more instering instead of emotional speeches about baldness
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
Nothing new :(
Instead interviewing Hamilton, they should get a interview with Alexey.

He may able to say what they already done in terms of technology and what is the next steps and changelles. It will be more instering instead of emotional speeches about baldness
We will wait a bit for such an interview, I wonder if this hair will last more than one season, I honestly write, I hope for commercialization in 2030
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
"15 million is absolutely nothing when we talk about this kind of investment, and the profit potential of a hair loss cure. It just shows they know this will lead nowhere."
 

FilthyFrancis

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
481
"15 million is absolutely nothing when we talk about this kind of investment, and the profit potential of a hair loss cure. It just shows they know this will lead nowhere."
This guy is nice but doesn't know sh*t about how research funding works. If they knew this will lead nowhere, they would not invest at all.

What happens is that investors will continuously invest in the research as it reaches its development milestones. This allows i) a limited risk for the investors who limits their sunk costs if the research fails during its development phase and ii) less dilution for the management as each milestones triggers a greater company valuation and therefore, each new investment is less diluting than it would have been if it were a one-shot investment at the very beginning of research.

In addition to that, there is no financial player in the industry keen to invest 15m€ in what he perceives as a busted tech. 99% of the times, funds have ticket size limitations (i.e. a min and max of investment size). This prevents the fund to invest insignificant amounts. Investments funds are very pragmatic when it comes to money, believe me.

My point is not to say this will be a success but that there is nothing, if not good news, to conclude from this funding round.
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
This guy is nice but doesn't know sh*t about how research funding works. If they knew this will lead nowhere, they would not invest at all.

What happens is that investors will continuously invest in the research as it reaches its development milestones. This allows i) a limited risk for the investors who limits their sunk costs if the research fails during its development phase and ii) less dilution for the management as each milestones triggers a greater company valuation and therefore, each new investment is less diluting than it would have been if it were a one-shot investment at the very beginning of research.

In addition to that, there is no financial player in the industry keen to invest 15m€ in what he perceives as a busted tech. 99% of the times, funds have ticket size limitations (i.e. a min and max of investment size). This prevents the fund to invest insignificant amounts. Investments funds are very pragmatic when it comes to money, believe me.

My point is not to say this will be a success but that there is nothing, if not good news, to conclude from this funding round.
in my case only stemson can help
 

pegasus2

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,512
"15 million is absolutely nothing when we talk about this kind of investment, and the profit potential of a hair loss cure. It just shows they know this will lead nowhere."
I don't always invest 15 million dollars in a company, but when I do it's because I know it will lead nowhere
 

trialAcc

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,531
"15 million is absolutely nothing when we talk about this kind of investment, and the profit potential of a hair loss cure. It just shows they know this will lead nowhere."
Does he know it's a series A investment? Or even what that is? What exactly is he expecting, people to throw around hundreds of millions for invalidated ideas? Someone should tell him that Facebook's Series A was around 12.5 million dollars, so I guess this company is a little bit less likely to lead no where then Facebook?

Once Stemson has some proof of concept trials or is about to move into human trials, they will raise another round of funding in the ball park of 35-60 mil.
 
Last edited:

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
Does he know it's a series A investment? Or even what that is? What exactly is he expecting, people to throw around hundreds of millions for invalidated ideas? Someone should tell him that Facebook's Series A was around 12.5 million dollars, so I guess this company is a little bit less likely to lead no where then Facebook?

Once Stemson has some proof of concept trials or is about to move into human trials, they will raise another round of funding in the ball park of 35-60 mil.
count on stemson, no gene editing will help and bring back a full head of hair
 

1919

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
214
This guy is nice but doesn't know sh*t about how research funding works. If they knew this will lead nowhere, they would not invest at all.

What happens is that investors will continuously invest in the research as it reaches its development milestones. This allows i) a limited risk for the investors who limits their sunk costs if the research fails during its development phase and ii) less dilution for the management as each milestones triggers a greater company valuation and therefore, each new investment is less diluting than it would have been if it were a one-shot investment at the very beginning of research.

In addition to that, there is no financial player in the industry keen to invest 15m€ in what he perceives as a busted tech. 99% of the times, funds have ticket size limitations (i.e. a min and max of investment size). This prevents the fund to invest insignificant amounts. Investments funds are very pragmatic when it comes to money, believe me.

My point is not to say this will be a success but that there is nothing, if not good news, to conclude from this funding round.
Well explained!
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
"honestly, ive been balding aggressively, I was a Tsuji saint, I followed every statement he released. and I dont think Stemson is gonna make it. like I threw in the towel. the ceo of Stemson even released a detailed plan about releasing a cream. and honestly I think thats whats gonna happen. after histogen failed(funny enough I called in 2016 volunteering for a trial in Mexico, never heard back), replicel is a waste at 10% improvement. like I love my face, but damn bald doesn’t suit me, im only 21."
 

FilthyFrancis

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
481
"honestly, ive been balding aggressively, I was a Tsuji saint, I followed every statement he released. and I dont think Stemson is gonna make it. like I threw in the towel. the ceo of Stemson even released a detailed plan about releasing a cream. and honestly I think thats whats gonna happen. after histogen failed(funny enough I called in 2016 volunteering for a trial in Mexico, never heard back), replicel is a waste at 10% improvement. like I love my face, but damn bald doesn’t suit me, im only 21."
Source for Stemson working on a cream?
 

trialAcc

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,531
"honestly, ive been balding aggressively, I was a Tsuji saint, I followed every statement he released. and I dont think Stemson is gonna make it. like I threw in the towel. the ceo of Stemson even released a detailed plan about releasing a cream. and honestly I think thats whats gonna happen. after histogen failed(funny enough I called in 2016 volunteering for a trial in Mexico, never heard back), replicel is a waste at 10% improvement. like I love my face, but damn bald doesn’t suit me, im only 21."
I love to hear about people with 0 insights other then their own admitted biases telling people why something wont work.
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
Source for Stemson working on a cream?
product 3
Hair modulation drug
• Scalable DP cell production enables drug screening
• Search for molecules that impeded DP cell function
• Topical cream or injectablesolution to address hair removal market
• Can run product development in parallel with product 1 & 2
 
Top