who knows?You're most likely right. If this is the case, why do they invite and pay to speak?
who knows?You're most likely right. If this is the case, why do they invite and pay to speak?
I don't think they would've hired all these new people if they weren't liking what they see in the pig studies. I just wish they would wrap up the pig studies and announce human trials.I noticed today that Stemson added someone new to the list for Research and Development. They completed their current hiring. Now at least 33 people in total are part of the company. The question is they've hired all these people, I sure hope they're making progress.
Amen to that! But just as much I would like for them to report their findings from the pigs they've had so far. They may never do this until the results are satisfactory. Even if they've had some progress, it would be good to know.I don't think they would've hired all these new people if they weren't liking what they see in the pig studies. I just wish they would wrap up the pig studies and announce human trials.
strangely to characters like Bezos and Musk, despite having this problem they don't give a damn about throwing away some of their monstrous wealth to solve the problem, how magnificent is capitalism.They moving forward, that is obvious, but i am not excited about their team, I will be excited if they will hire Tsuji or Fukuda, and Bezos give them al money they want for r&d
Bezos an musk both are pussies, rich cucks that is allstrangely to characters like Bezos and Musk, despite having this problem they don't give a damn about throwing away some of their monstrous wealth to solve the problem, how magnificent is capitalism.
Maybe they aren't aware of the state of hair research? Who could know? Trying to reach them can't be easy. I think Musk was reported to have had a transplant or maybe he's using a system. For him I'm surprised that he wouldn't have explored what's going on in hair cloning research. Probably they are overwhelmed by people asking them for money, so they turn a deaf ear. If they gave money to anything people asked for, they'd be quickly broke.strangely to characters like Bezos and Musk, despite having this problem they don't give a damn about throwing away some of their monstrous wealth to solve the problem, how magnificent is capitalism.
How would that make sense though hiring someone living in Japan? I think part of their hiring requirements is being located in the USA and to lawfully be allowed to work there. I notice the people they hire are local. What do you think is lacking in their team? Lack of reputation or recognition?They moving forward, that is obvious, but i am not excited about their team, I will be excited if they will hire Tsuji or Fukuda, and Bezos give them al money they want for r&d
Do you think this is a possible way?Actually bezos invest in reverse aging company which can solve hair loss problems from the root.
If you can reverse the epigenome then you can get the hair you had in your teens
Androgenetic Alopecia isn't aging caused by aging, it's caused by continued exposure to androgens. Age has nothing to do with it. It's due to androgens + sh*t genetics.Actually bezos invest in reverse aging company which can solve hair loss problems from the root.
If you can reverse the epigenome then you can get the hair you had in your teens
Well, preventing somebody from aging doesn't mean somebody is immortal. If God decides to thunderstrike somebody, no amount of age reversal will save his life.how will this technology be on the market if considered potentially immoral by the church and dangerous due to the fact that it can prolong life indefinitely? Should the moralists and the well-thinking be eliminated?
It is a new technology. We don't know it's limits and consequences. Aging is a complex process. I guess that most benefits will be aesthetics in the beginning.how will this technology be on the market if considered potentially immoral by the church and dangerous due to the fact that it can prolong life indefinitely? Should the moralists and the well-thinking be eliminated?
I'm not so sure the churches would be opposed to a "cure" for the aging process. Remember, churches are made up of people and people don't want to die so even if church leaders don't approve of a "cure" for aging a lot of the individual members of every church would approve of a "cure" for aging.how will this technology be on the market if considered potentially immoral by the church and dangerous due to the fact that it can prolong life indefinitely? Should the moralists and the well-thinking be eliminated?
I'm not so sure individual church members would be opposed to this technology. Some church members might be opposed to it but if they are then they could just die of old age while those church members who don't oppose this technology could partake in the technology and stay alive.It is a new technology. We don't know it's limits and consequences. Aging is a complex process. I guess that most benefits will be aesthetics in the beginning.
And the Church wouldn't be alone against this technology. A lot of ppl think that we shouldn't play with this technology. We would have to find enough resources for immortal beings.
People would still die of things like car accidents and many other things even if there is no god.Well, preventing somebody from aging doesn't mean somebody is immortal. If God decides to thunderstrike somebody, no amount of age reversal will save his life.
Yeah, or the results are terrible and they need more people to get it right. All this news can be interpreted positively as well as negatively. There is just no telling.I don't think they would've hired all these new people if they weren't liking what they see in the pig studies. I just wish they would wrap up the pig studies and announce human trials.
I was thinking the same thing.Yeah, or the results are terrible and they need more people to get it right. All this news can be interpreted positively as well as negatively. There is just no telling.
You right. Some ppl believe that God limited our life span to 120 years. There would be some noise about it. It would depend on the doctrine of each church. But even so that is the least accepted interpretation of the Bible.I'm not so sure individual church members would be opposed to this technology. Some church members might be opposed to it but if they are then they could just die of old age while those church members who don't oppose this technology could partake in the technology and stay alive.