Tinder The Really Hard Truth About Girls

CopeForLife

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,866
Thanks.

I'm an AmeriFUCK.

My mission here is to ENTERTAIN YOU.

Please COMMENT, so I can give you more PERSONAL ATTENTION.

In fact, I will send you my personal pages, so you can ROAST me on the Internet.

Thanks I am fine.

Nothing bores me more than reading about politics in non-native language.

Especially about boring one like US/UKcels or Eurocucks.
 

rclark

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,773
He whines like a 2-year old about his hair loss. He talks tough but he's a very weak person.

Believe it or not, I actually like Cope For Life's posts.

It's just posting personal information, over a high traffic site such as this,
is kind of uncalled for.

He didn't do anything to me. That said, why do it.

Now, if the OTHER person did it to Cope For Life FIRST, than I support him.

If not, than this is just trolling (in my humble opinion).
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
Believe it or not, I actually like Cope For Life's posts.

It's just posting personal information, over a high traffic site such as this,
is kind of uncalled for.

He didn't do anything to me. That said, why do it.

Now, if the OTHER person did it to Cope For Life FIRST, than I support him.

If not, than this is just trolling (in my humble opinion).

IMO his post was an attack against Americans and I'm an American so I decided to respond by badmouthing him.
 

rclark

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,773
IMO his post was an attack against Americans and I'm an American so I decided to respond by badmouthing him.

It doesn't offend me at all, to be honest.

I'm not even patriotic. Amerifuck, MOTHER AMERIFUCK, I've heard it ALL.

Now I'm learning French, the way I see it.
 

Guzam

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,848
FU dude.

I know how to weed out the bad news sources, which means I sh*t-can RT.

I gather that you're some Russian stooge.

Which country do you reside?

I'm Italian, lol. We have a sad history of communist, Russia-backed terrorism and fascist, American-backed terrorism. They are called the Years of Lead. I'm no Russian stooge.

Lol at your sad situation. You claim to know, but in fact you know nothing. I've learned to be very careful in taking sides in foreign conflicts: info come here translated and skewed. Sad, you don't realize this. Hope you will
 

hairblues

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,249
I don't hate Mr. Barack Hussein Obama but I do dislike for what he represents and that is corporate elite interests. I'm all in for democracy and anti- oligarchy which you currently have in USA and which needs to end.-

This could have weight if the opponent of HRC was not Trump...who is showing by his actions since being President-Elect exactly whose interest he has in mind--and its not the middle class. He has demonstrated this by his cabinet picks--just about ALL of them we can go one by one if you like...and he has shown this by his tax plan.

I get what you guys say internationally--but domestically? ugh he's a nightmare...and internationally when you see how eratic he really is (iits not worth debating lets see over next 6 months when the world wakes up to realize the man has a personality disorder) You will regret that you thought Trump was going to be the peaceful international player..not going to happen.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
I'm Italian, lol. We have a sad history of communist, Russia-backed terrorism and fascist, American-backed terrorism. They are called the Years of Lead. I'm no Russian stooge.

Lol at your sad situation. You claim to know, but in fact you know nothing. I've learned to be very careful in taking sides in foreign conflicts: info come here translated and skewed. Sad, you don't realize this. Hope you will

Italy is a Russian stooge. Italians have been against the Russian sanctions all along. And it's all about money with Italians. You sell your principles and other people's freedom for money. You want to sell millions of Ukraine people to Russia so sanctions will be lifted and Italy can do more business with Russia. Italy is the reincarnation of Neville Chamberlain. You want to give Ukraine to Putin/Russia the same way Neville Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler.

http://katehon.com/news/italy-wants-lift-anti-russian-sanctions
 
Last edited:

blackg

Senior Member
Reaction score
5,723
Thanks I am fine.

Nothing bores me more than reading about politics in non-native language.

Especially about boring one like US/UKcels or Eurocucks.
Your post make me laugh, dude.
According to you the whole world is made up of "cucks" and "cels."

By the way... what happens in America affects the whole damn world so it is relevant to every citizen on the planet.

Just look at the biggest sporting event on the yearly calendar, the Super Bowl!
The whole damn world stops for the Super Bowl.
Even in tiny backwater countries like Italy and Belgium the citizens all make plans for Super Bowl Sunday.

Don't tell me you didn't make plans for the last Super Bowl.
If you say you didn't, then you're just coping.

Give it some thought all you eurocucks.
 

Patrick_Bateman

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
5,714
Your post make me laugh, dude.
According to you the whole world is made up of "cuck" and "cels."

By the way... what happens in America affects the whole damn world so it is relevant to every citizen on the planet.

Just look at the biggest sporting event on the yearly calendar, the Super Bowl!
The whole damn world stops for the Super Bowl.
Even tiny backwater countries like Italy and Belgium.

Don't tellersquill you didn't make plans for the last Super Bowl.
If you say you didn't, then you're just coping.

Give it some thought all you eurocucks.
You're wrong. No one I know watches Super Bowl. Super Bowl has WAY less viewers than the football (soccer for you 'muricans) world cup.
I have not watched a single american football game in my life, americans love thinking you're the centre of the universe but, you're not. Your sport is literally beaten by cricket in viewership. I'm not even going into the fact that people watch superbowl for the commercials...
130750_story__nfl.jpg
 

blackg

Senior Member
Reaction score
5,723
You're wrong. No one I know watches Super Bowl. Super Bowl has WAY less viewers than the football (soccer for you 'muricans) world cup.
I have not watched a single american football game in my life, americans love thinking you're the centre of the universe but, you're not. Your sport is literally beaten by cricket in viewership. I'm not even going into the fact that people watch superbowl for the commercials...
130750_story__nfl.jpg
I doubt the veracity of this graph.
It looks highly dubious to me.

America still dominates in fashion, sport, language and would class movies.
The sooner you Eurocucks accept this, the easier your lives will be.

Blackg approved. From sea to shining sea.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
I get what you guys say internationally--but domestically? ugh he's a nightmare...and internationally when you see how eratic he really is (iits not worth debating lets see over next 6 months when the world wakes up to realize the man has a personality disorder) You will regret that you thought Trump was going to be the peaceful international player..not going to happen.

I also do not need to wait 6 months to know that Trump is much more dangerous than HRC. I already know it. But it would seem that some people don't know it.

Trump is unpredictable. His Russian policy can go from kiss-*** to hater in a flash. And he's skipping the kiss-*** stage with China altogether and going straight to hater. And when he hates he can be volatile. This could be a big problem. I'm not sure it will be a big problem but 4 years is a long time and if he gets real angry he could create a real problem during a 4 year stretch. Clinton is not as wild and volatile. HRC is rational and she would always stay mindful that Russia has nukes.

As far as Clinton's position on the No-Fly-Zone goes, her position evolved and her final position was that she would negotiate a deal with the Russians and Syria. That means that her No-Fly-Zone would have things demanded by Russia and Syria. IF someone tells you that HRC wanted to impose a No-Fly-Zone without including this fact they are not telling you the whole story. They're withholding the fact that Clinton was not going to do a No-Fly-Zone w/o Russian acquiescence. There's a big difference between imposing a No-Fly-Zone and negotiating a No-Fly-Zone.

http://russia-insider.com/en/clinton-now-wants-negotiated-syria-no-fly-zone/ri17138
 
Last edited:

hairblues

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
8,249
You're wrong. No one I know watches Super Bowl. Super Bowl has WAY less viewers than the football (soccer for you 'muricans) world cup.
I have not watched a single american football game in my life, americans love thinking you're the centre of the universe but, you're not. Your sport is literally beaten by cricket in viewership. I'm not even going into the fact that people watch superbowl for the commercials...
130750_story__nfl.jpg


He is Australian
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
Many legitimate points @hairblues that distinguish the American situation from the European situation.

@FredTheBelgian has actually acknowledged some bizareness with the American right wing in the past. For example he's glad he wasn't crippled by student loans, and that he has access to public health care and public transportation.

It was simply an all-out atrocious situation in this election. It wasn't good against evil, it was evil against evil. Trump: all the problems you mention. Meanwhile Hillary wanted to wage an aggressive war against Russia and to intervene in Syria immediately after the election. It would have been a catastrophe.

Where's your proof that Hillary Clinton wanted to start a WAR in Syria?

Also, the Obama admin has already been intervening in the Syrian war so when you say HRC planned to intervene in the Syrian War what exactly does that mean? Are you saying HRC would have intervened more than Obama already has? Oh wait, you claim she intended to start a war with them so that's what you mean. Please provide links to her intentions to start a war in Syria.
 
Last edited:

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
I did not give the same respect to nameless. In his case I couldn't be bothered to put anything together as it would be pointless.

So the reason why you won't explain why you claim Obama "ruined" the economy is because you don't respect me.

What a load of bullshit.

The reason why you won't explain how Obama "ruined" the economy is because there's no sensible explanation for your claim that Obama "ruined" the economy since the economy is NOT ruined.
 
Last edited:

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
She was heavily endorsed by the neoconservative establishment, and her foreign policy orbiters largely included Victoria Nuland, Robert Kagan, Samantha Power, Michael McFaul, etc. Robert Kagan explicitly highlited how she's better than Obama on the basis that Obama fears nuclear war with Russia. See for example this excellent article:
https://theintercept.com/2016/07/25/robert-kagan-and-other-neocons-back-hillary-clinton/


During the presidential debates she explicitly said that she wants to impose a no-fly zone over Syria. Do you know what that means? It means shooting down Russian jets. That's what a no-fly zone is: shooting down enemy planes. Once you shoot down Russian jets, it's hard to go back. This lunatic comment, for which she understood the implications, was widely discussed in the media:
http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/12/hillary-clintons-insane-plan-for-a-no-fly-zone.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...zone-third-debate_us_58084280e4b0180a36e91a53
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/25/hillary-clinton-syria-no-fly-zones-russia-us-war
http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/10/20/hillary-clinton-just-say-okay-going-war-russia/
The first of the four links is from 13 months ago, showing it's been a long-term issue with Clinton.

She also said she wanted to negotiate that same No-Fly-Zone so she didn't intend to impose it.
 
Last edited:

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
Give it a rest, nameless. Can't you see that David is done debating with you.

Of course I can but

1. He continues to talk about me.

2. I think it's important to point out that he hasn't answered some reasonable questions.

He claims that Obama has ruined the economy and Mexico. I would like an explanation of how Obama has ruined an economy when the economy is doing just fine, and I would an explanation what Obama has done to Mexico.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
I go watch La La Land,

Sometime after finishing the movie, I check my notifications,

I find a dislike (petty) and three (yes, three) uninterrupted quotes from @nameless followed by rambling, decontextualized responses.

You talk about me and I talk about you. Were joined at the hip.

Also, why don't you answer my two questions?

* I would like to know what you mean when you say Obama has "ruined" the economy even though the economy is NOT ruined?

* I would also like to know what you think Obama has done to Mexico since you whined about Obama messing up Mexico?
 
Top