- Reaction score
- 8,249
He said that?
Tinder The Really Hard Truth About Girls
- Thread starter N003
- Start date
He said that?
He also said that Clinton was going to impose a No-Fly-Zone w/o including the fact that she was going to NEGOTIATE that No-Fly-Zone. He also told you that HRC planned to start war in Syria but she never said she planned to start war in Syria.
- Reaction score
- 11,938
You've read my posts.
nameless is somewhat illiterate though so he is misunderstanding what I wrote. A lot of the current problems are due to Obama being a passive president, and are thus a missed opportunity of prevention. For example, his administration chose not to pursue criminal action against Wall Street. None of them have gone to jail, this will lead and likely has led to long-term structural problems.
On the economy, here's a good recent anecdotes. The vast majority of new jobs created during the Obama era were part-tme or contract jobs:
https://www.investing.com/news/econ...ing-obama-era-part-time,-contract-work-449057
https://www.rt.com/usa/371329-obama-freelance-contractors-job-growth/
blackg
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,723
Yeah, with respect, David, we need some explanations.
The U.S. economy is still ranked number one in the world.
Now, as far as Mexico is concerned..
I can understand if some trade deals, negotiated by the Obama administration, have somehow negatively affected certain sections of the Mexican economy (this is an inevitable by-product of most free trade deals), but to say Obama has ruined Mexico is a real stretch.
The U.S. economy is still ranked number one in the world.
Now, as far as Mexico is concerned..
I can understand if some trade deals, negotiated by the Obama administration, have somehow negatively affected certain sections of the Mexican economy (this is an inevitable by-product of most free trade deals), but to say Obama has ruined Mexico is a real stretch.
Here is David's post condemning Obama because (David says) America presently has a "ruined" economy and because Obama is somehow responsible for the "destruction" of Mexico. WTF is David talking about? I think it's reasonable to want to know what David is talking about? The economy seems pretty good to me and Obama hasn't done anything to Mexico.
David_MPNSenior Member
Joined:
Dec 12, 2015
Messages:
3,234
Likes Received:
1,849
Dislikes Received:
43
↑
You're an Obamabot.
Obama is a complete, colossal failure as president. No positive legacy. Economy ruined. Middle East ruined. Libya destroyed. Mexico destroyed. Russia on the rise.
Awful president.
Maybe not as bad as Clinton would have been.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 8,249
Economy is doing incredibly well compared to 8 years ago when we were tanking.
is it perfect and is everyone in better place? no but from the nightmare we survived its pretty damn good for 8 years.
Im going by people i know and where they are now compared to 8 years ago.
I do not believe in my life time (perhaps in 70s but i was a child) I can ever think of a time when a President was so throughly disrespected and blocked at every angle by congress.
In spite of all that purposeful and unprecedented obsructionism--he was a damn fine President.
What do you mean I'm "illiterate" David? Here is your post. I'm reading your own words. How can I be illiterate if I'm reading?
David_MPNSenior Member
Joined:
Dec 12, 2015
Messages:
3,234
Likes Received:
1,849
Dislikes Received:
43
↑
You're an Obamabot.
Obama is a complete, colossal failure as president. No positive legacy. Economy ruined. Middle East ruined. Libya destroyed. Mexico destroyed. Russia on the rise.
Awful president.
Maybe not as bad as Clinton would have been.
David_MPNSenior Member
Joined:
Dec 12, 2015
Messages:
3,234
Likes Received:
1,849
Dislikes Received:
43
↑
You're an Obamabot.
Obama is a complete, colossal failure as president. No positive legacy. Economy ruined. Middle East ruined. Libya destroyed. Mexico destroyed. Russia on the rise.
Awful president.
Maybe not as bad as Clinton would have been.
Last edited:
blackg
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,723
Nameless is not talking sh*t.
He just wants some answers.
Well, according to David the economy is "ruined" and Obama "ruined" it.
- Reaction score
- 8,249
Yeah I highlighted the stuff that I find it hard to take David very serious on American politics to be honest.
The other stuff i did not highlight is very debatable i will give him that...but what i highlighted its like not worth debating to be honest just let it go.
- Reaction score
- 8,249
As much as he may be cluttering you are as well..you are honestly not contributing anything but insults to people who are having conflicts that are not involving you.
David is calling Namles names as much as he is...they are both feeding one another.
Thank you blackj. I would just like some answers is all. He made some statements and I want to know what he's talking about.
1. How is Obama to blame for the ruination of our economy when the economy is NOT ruined?
2. How has Obama "destroyed" Mexico?
3. I would also like some links to information David found that establishes that HRC planned to start a war in Syria?
4. I would like to know if David understands that HRC intended to NEGOTIATE a No-Fly-Zone with Russia instead of imposing a No-Fly-Zone on Russia? Does he understand that there's a difference between imposing a No-Fly-Zone and NEGOTIATING one.
Last edited:
That's true. I admit I'm trying to squeeze David to explain himself. What I'm doing with him is not friendly. What I'm doing involves an inherent accusation that he is not what he purports himself to be.
But YOU ARE ALSO RIGHT that David IS insulting me too. And for the record, it's my position that the reason he's insulting me is because he has no good answers for my questions.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 11,938
Many of the people I know are also doing well, he's been a good president for academia. I meant the economy as a whole, not certain privileged sectors like academia, hollywood, wall street, etc.
She aint gonna fall for it dude. It isn't just a few parts of the economy that have improved. Everyone knows that the economy is doing better overall. Some parts of the economy are doing better than others but overall the economy is definitely NOT RUINED. Although it was teetering on ruination when Obama took office after the conservatives wrecked it.
Last edited:
And Obama has increased jobs in the private sector while reducing the number of government jobs. In other words, he's mostly helped the private sector. And he did this despite being a "complete" and "colossal" failure in David's eyes.
Here's a report on Obama's economy from the Main Street Media:
http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/06/news/economy/december-jobs-report-2016/index.html
Here's a report on Obama's economy from the Main Street Media:
http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/06/news/economy/december-jobs-report-2016/index.html
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 11,938
You are being angry today. You did turtle after I wrote you a well-researched post that you didn't know how to respond to and acted al belligerent for a bit.
But it's all right, this is the internet and it's kind of been a stupid thread. We're both still stephanie seymour fans, you still have a very interesting job, you're experimenting in the hair loss section and you have a lot of life experience which you share, so I still like you. I'm not even mad
You are being angry today. You did turtle after I wrote you a well-researched post that you didn't know how to respond to and acted al belligerent for a bit.
But it's all right, this is the internet and it's kind of been a stupid thread. We're both still stephanie seymour fans, you still have a very interesting job, you're experimenting in the hair loss section and you have a lot of life experience which you share, so I still like you. I'm not even mad
Hey David, I have high confidence that Pilofocus is going to achieve quality donor regeneration. We're going to get our hair back soon feller. We should go out and pick up some chicks together. You could be my wingman. LOL!
Last edited: