Verteporfin drug induced scarless healing with new hair follicles on mice. This new founding can be really big

Follisket

Established Member
Reaction score
288
Does anyone know whether Follica is aware of the recent discoveries regarding Verteporfin? My hopes for them were never particularly big, but the fact that they have the device pretty much ready while supposedly struggling to find a superior growth stimulant to minoxidil could make this a perfect match (and hopefully lead to a relatively fast market release?). I would imagine they, at very least, have an incentive to test this quicklacy.
 

DuncanOP

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
29
Interesting that they mention it can be used with strip surgeries (FUT’s). But also with smaller wounds such as FUE’s. And even microneedling:

«A method including injection of Verteporfin following micro-injury of a region of alopecia (via Fraxel, microneedling, or other similar approaches) may be used to promote increased hair regrowth in the region. This method does not require grafting of active hair follicles from other regions of skin but could instead encourage true de novo hair folliculogenesis in an otherwise hairless area.»
But it is in mouse, not in humans, right?
It is not tested in humans yet, anyway, looks very promising

@Follisket

My hopes for them were never particularly big, but the fact that they have the device pretty much ready while supposedly struggling to find a superior growth stimulant to minoxidil could make this a perfect match
Sorry, I didn't get your point. Verteporfin should heal scar and stimulate the recover of UF. So it is not related to regrowth.

Plus I think it should be injected to relative deep into scalp. I mean, a "simply dermaroller" isn't enough to do it. A chirurgical approach could be necessary to inject Verteporfin
 
Last edited:

FollicleGuardian

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
732
But it is in mouse, not in humans, right?
It is not tested in humans yet, anyway, looks very promising

@Follisket


Sorry, I didn't get your point. Verteporfin should heal scar and stimulate the recover of UF. So it is not related to regrowth.

Plus I think it should be injected to relative deep into scalp. I mean, a "simply dermaroller" isn't enough to do it. A chirurgical approach could be necessary to inject Verteporfin
You can use FAK inhibitors which does not need to be injected.

the approach is tested in pigs which is the big hurdle. As their skin and scarring mechanisms are extremely similar to human skin.
 

FollicleGuardian

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
732
Does anyone know whether Follica is aware of the recent discoveries regarding Verteporfin? My hopes for them were never particularly big, but the fact that they have the device pretty much ready while supposedly struggling to find a superior growth stimulant to minoxidil could make this a perfect match (and hopefully lead to a relatively fast market release?). I would imagine they, at very least, have an incentive to test this quicklacy.
Why would they cooperate with Follica? Stanford has the cure, and the intellectual property to this. Follica has an overhyped microneedling device.
 

DAVAT

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
84
We have to share this study to follicle thought and hlc2020 or to dermatologists/doctors directly

Hairlosscure2020 is already covering it

FAK Inhibitor for Hair Loss​

I saved the most important news for last. In recent days, a few people discussed this Stanford University research (first posted by “DrPhil”) on our hair loss chat.

FAK-Inhibitor-Hair-Growth-126x300.png
FAK inhibitor skin healing and hair follicle regrowth at 180 days. Source: Nature Communications.
The researchers found that blocking mechanical signaling via FAK (focal adhesion kinase) inhibition promotes regenerative skin healing.
 

glammetal

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
93
*yawn* Wake me up when HMI-115 is available. That's at least been proven to grow long, thick terminal hairs in primates. I must have seen nearly a dozen studies over the years of mouse excisions healing with new hair. I've yet to see it in humans. This is quite promising for skin regeneration, but I won't hold my breath for terminal hair
Yes but their site is not working for many months.
 

FollicleGuardian

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
732
What am I looking at. Hard to see.
Pig skin. The gold standard model of skin research. Closest to humans. The picture lowest is the one pig that is treated with a FAK inhibitor. The two above are non treated pigs.
 

pegasus2

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,512
Pig skin. The gold standard model of skin research. Closest to humans. The picture lowest is the one pig that is treated with a FAK inhibitor. The two above are non treated pigs.
Amazing how much hair the non-treated pigs regenerated for an animal whose skin is just like humans. It's almost as if their skin wounds express different molecular signals to begin with
 
Reaction score
54
Amazing how much hair the non-treated pigs regenerated for an animal whose skin is just like humans. It's almost as if their skin wounds express different molecular signals to begin with

Yeah, there's a lot of hair regrowth even on non treated wounds. So much for pig skin is very close to human skin.
 

FollicleGuardian

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
732
I see 0 hair in the non treated ones
 

pegasus2

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,512
Every scientist wants to hype their findings so they can get more funding. Always take it with a grain of salt
 

FollicleGuardian

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
732
You do that on a human and you get a perfect rectangle of nothing but scar tissue.
You really don’t if there is mechanical stretching. Look at FUT scars.
 

FollicleGuardian

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
732
FUTs are stitched up
There’s a reason for it. To not get stretches. There’s always tension. In these pigs there’s a lot of it.
 

FollicleGuardian

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
732
I'm going to say this one more time because I care about you bro. You gotta stop coping. It's not healthy. Maybe we can do an intervention for you on discord
Haha bro lmao <3
 

Diffused_confidence

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
647
They were much bigger excisions than what's remaining bald
I think that may be due to the wound being deeper in some areas. There is a diagram of the wounds and the outer layer doesn't go into the dermis it seems. Maybe that's why there is some regrowth around the border?
 

-specter-

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
47
I believe that at this point the only answer can come by testing the procedure on humans and seeing what happens. I have enough faith in this theory because as I said in the past I know of people who have been "treated" with herbal concoctions in Sardinia who have experienced healing from burns and wounds with a lot of hair regrowth. Now we have never managed to deal with it with the pharmaceutical companies, but if a farmer in a remote place has succeeded, I do not see why the product of serious scientific research cannot work.
 
Top