Awww! Am I unfair to you?
In the interest of fairness, let me explain that I have indeed pointed out David's questionable claims, but for the most part it's irrelevant. He doesn't use his "experiences" to trump others in debates like you do, not only does it give you a little false positivity boost for some reason that guys on a baldness forum THINK you have sex, but you also feel it gives you that extra ammunition to go "That's not what women do, in my experience of 93 first dates and 217 casual encounters and 1387 blow jobs and..."
So although I don't encourage lying in any sense, I don't care what David does really, it may not be healthy but he doesn't use his experiences in an actively harmful way like you do.
I'm also not even accusing David of lying here, I just haven't bothered thinking about it much so I don't know one way or another, and I give him the benefit of the doubt if he does use personal experience in a debate, because he isn't fixated on "winning" a debate he just likes to progress things and come to an understanding.
This is a very different debating style to yours Fred (most of the time).
If I was lying, I would make up more interesting stories. I honestly have no interest in lying on this anonymous forum (lol), and I assume nobody else does.
If you look at Fred above, you constantly accuse him of lying, yet he just admitted that he never dates intelligent women, he only ever pursues women of low intellect. If he were a liar, why would he sell himself short that way?
I take Fred as discussing an honest, if maybe sometimes mistaken, take on his own anecdotal experiences, which are a very biased subset of reality. He's met a lot of women, but I suspect they all come from a very narrow demographic and population range. For example he rules out smart women. I think what he writes is his truth, nothing but his truth, but it's not the whole truth (to quote the justice system), and that's his choice.
Incidentally, I've never been attracted to a dim woman, except once when I was 13 (lol). If a woman can't hold a conversation, has no drive, no ambition, no interests other than staying home and watching reruns of Friends, then I won't be interested. I need a strong personality.
I've been mostly casual in this debate because I have the high ground ... if you see someone get angry then that means they believe they've lost the battle. It's very clear that the people crying "coping! coping!" are themselves the ones coping, making excuses to justify their laziness, I realized that a few weeks ago. Some posters are actually saying that women prefer men who have 25% body fat percentage or that they're never attracted strength -- they're coping hard. There is absolutely no doubt that factors like better financial security, whiter teeth, better clothes, contact lens, lower body fat, and more lean body mass will contribute to attracting women and better women at that and then keeping them afterwards, to argue otherwise is simply to make excuses. I can point to this from combinations of anecdotes, scientific studies in the literature, google links, surveys, et cetera but overall it's well known and non-disputed by non-delusional people.
My advice to almost anybody who wants to get better women: be a better man. What that means varies from man to man. For some it might mean a hair transplant, for other it might mean getting a life, and so on. It admittedly will take a lot of skill and self-awareness to critically evaluate yourself. For short men, it is an unfortunate tragedy that thigh extension surgery is still expensive and unsafe.
