I Accidentally Found Out My Brother Is Gay And Dont Know What To Do (he Doesnt Know I Know)

[Stanx22]

One of them is quite ugly.

I saw her boyfriend/boy toy once: beta NW4 cuck.

How this guy even manages to get it up with her is beyond me.

When women reach their 30's and become sexually unappealing they lower their standards and usually just care about money or status because they've had enough of good sex with good-looking men.

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

I tell (have told) my girl all the time I used to do things by myself very often. I would go out to eat, hike, movies, etc etc just to be alone. Her own jealousy prohibits this in my life now and I miss it. I would go through these stints of being alone (young me) and start to think I was lonely. I wasnt it was just what society would tell me. My friends with their girls, people asking why I didnt have a girlfriend, tv, media etc etc all planting the idea that male/female companionship was a necessity. Its not. After a crazy break up I had years ago I realized it wasnt. Sex was sex, friends were friends, that was pretty much all I needed. I am honestly that one guy who could have female friends and never try to sleep with them so female friends were my escape from a real girlfriend to do "couples stuff". Unfortunately girls are worse than guys as co ed friendships honestly.
If he wants to go to a museum then find a "friend" who wants to do that. Find a group, post an ad.
"Hey interested in going to MOMA this Saturday, looking for a tag along, interested?"
Again its a digital age, use an app.
If Im sick, I actually seriously want to be left alone, like 110%. Logistics issues I like to have someone there just to get an unbiased POV on whatever situation Im dealing with to compare to my own rational.
legalize prostitution and Ill never need ANYONE AGAIN! lol
People may think Im cold, or bitter, etc etc but to me Ive just matured beyond the need to "need" somebody. No man is an island, but some guys are definitely an archipelago

People need love, affection and of course sex in order to achieve happiness, it's human nature. You might be able to be happy for awhile without it, but you'll never reach true happiness. Fighting human nature is a losing battle.
In Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs sex is mentioned in the physiological needs and the belonging needs.

 

[Stanx22]

People need love, affection and of course sex in order to achieve happiness, it's human nature. You might be able to be happy for awhile without it, but you'll never reach true happiness. Fighting human nature is a losing battle.
In Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs sex is mentioned in the psychological needs and the belonging needs.
View attachment 62527

That's absolutely right. When you give up on women and sex, you also give up on all the chances of having a happy life.

 

[swingline747]

People need love, affection and of course sex in order to achieve happiness, it's human nature. You might be able to be happy for awhile without it, but you'll never reach true happiness. Fighting human nature is a losing battle.
In Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs sex is mentioned in the physiological needs and the belonging needs.
View attachment 62527

No where did it say marriage. Sex is mentioned twice. In fact no where do I see a relationship in general.
Also this chart is still theory above all.

 

[swingline747]

I've seen you long for legalized prostitution as if it would be an antidote to female bitchiness or our dependency to them, something like that.

Well, it's always been legal (not exactly, tolerated actually) in Belgium and men are the same, and women are the same.

Beta cucks still want to sweep bitchy and castrating women off their feet.

And men who are caught going to a prostitute are seen as huge losers, which is why very few men even go.

Going to a prostitute is seen as one of the worst offenses ever, you know the rationale, "real men don't need it!"

Well it would make my life easier. All you need is one guy to speak for all and the rest will follow

 

[Marky]

View attachment 62544 View attachment 62545 View attachment 62544 View attachment 62545

"But they shouldn't be celebrated, which is why (like most people), I find the pride parades ridiculous and counterproductive for the image of gay people"

Just ask yourselves why they have to march in underwear, gee strings and some buck naked. Why don't they just put on some jeans
or shorts if it's too hot. Where do we draw the line on their behavior and playing the victim card while spreading perversion.
Here's a "music" video from a guy I knew who is not really making it in acting - Father Lover, 2 gay dudes who want to do each others
dads. Kind of comedic, but whats next for these people and their "rights"

Marky you are so backwards and anti-intellectual, it's embarrassing. You can take any random thing and use it to smear what "they" do. How old are you? Is it your age or your religion that makes you so dumb?

and you're so imorally wet you don't feel the rain anymore. So tell me where do we draw the line on this, for starters how about parents bringing their kids to see lewd perversion so they can grow up to be disturbed and confused:

 

[Marky]

People need love, affection and of course sex in order to achieve happiness, it's human nature. You might be able to be happy for awhile without it, but you'll never reach true happiness. Fighting human nature is a losing battle.
In Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs sex is mentioned in the physiological needs and the belonging needs.
View attachment 62527

I remember Marlow's hierarchy back in university and even then I knew better than sex belonging in the
category of food, water and breath. But I guess when you're "educating" university students no one will disagree with you -
just liberal corrupt garbage.

 

[hairblues]

I remember Marlow's hierarchy back in university and even then I knew better than sex belonging in the
category of food, water and breath. But I guess when you're "educating" university students no one will disagree with you -
just liberal corrupt garbage.

I am curious, were you ever married? you seem a strong proponent for a traditional family being devout catholic.
You in 40s now?

I am being nosey but just curious if you never got married as a Catholic--why not? Did you come to catholicism late in life?

 

[Marky]

I am curious, were you ever married? you seem a strong proponent for a traditional family being devout catholic.
You in 40s now?

I am being nosey but just curious if you never got married as a Catholic--why not? Did you come to catholicism late in life?

Yes 41, but youthful looking, often get mistaken for younger.

Devout Catholic, born and raised - but started to pay attention to my faith more late 20's.

Never married, complicated, never thought I met the right person, confess a bit picky (but you have to be), cynical because many marriage don't make it today, think some are called to the single life and maybe better suited for them (even casting director in a film put me as the single guy lol, but might have been an omen), time flies etc.

Still hope to get married, kinda late I know - but maybe I'll be around till age 102, so in that sense lots of time.
Maybe I'll be like George Clooney and marry at 50. Who knows anything for sure when it comes to this stuff.

I think one of the biggest tragedies in life is marrying the wrong person, of course you won't find that out till
later in life. I'm not sure what would be worse, going through a divorce or stuck living with someone that you
scratch your head over wondering why I married them. Then at some point the right person does finally come along. Whatever "right" means in this case. But I learn as I go through experience and observation - it's a tough game, I don't think anyone could deny that.

My simple philosophy is timing in life is everything, it's the difference between making a fortune or losing it, it's the difference between meeting the right person and the wrong one, then being sorry for the rest of your life. These 2 things alone are biggies and determine in large part the quality of your life.

 

[hanginginthewire]

View attachment 62544 View attachment 62545 View attachment 62544 View attachment 62545


and you're so imorally wet you don't feel the rain anymore. So tell me where do we draw the line on this, for starters how about parents bringing their kids to see lewd perversion so they can grow up to be disturbed and confused:

I can't see any images in your post. And AGAIN, the issue at hand (I guess, not that I would actually "debate" this with someone like you lol) is - are same sex relationships immoral or otherwise problematic? And you keep building strawgays, with risque outfits and sexual practices that you disagree with. Whether someone should take their minor child to a pride parade has nothing to do with the nature of homosexuality. Just like the fact that some priests are kiddie fiddlers isn't a commentary on the validity of Catholicism. Hope it sinks in this time.

Give it some thought.

 

[OldnBald]

I can't see any images in your post. And AGAIN, the issue at hand (I guess, not that I would actually "debate" this with someone like you lol) is - are same sex relationships immoral or otherwise problematic? And you keep building strawgays, with risque outfits and sexual practices that you disagree with. Whether someone should take their minor child to a pride parade has nothing to do with the nature of homosexuality. Just like the fact that some priests are kiddie fiddlers isn't a commentary on the validity of Catholicism. Hope it sinks in this time.

Give it some thought.

Why are you arguing with this one? We've all had this argument/conversation before n we all know where it usually ends.

The only good thing is in 20 years, even less, these old threads will look like a relic of ancient times (hell they nearly do now).

 

[Dante92]

Did you even read my post? That woman is hideous!

Oh, right, sorry if I didn't take that seriously. Of course they both are.

 

[Christian Miller]

This again...

View attachment 62583

Care to elaborate @Christian Miller ?

What?
Ain't it clear already?
I disagree with almost everything you've posted in this thread.
What about?

 

[Christian Miller]

Why?

Why do I disagree?
'cause your way of thinking is stereotype-driven, I guess.

 

[Exodus2011]

Uhhh well his bro cud technically be bisexual lol

 

[Christian Miller]

Well, if you think the opposite of what I say it's true, I'd say that your thinking is ideologically-driven.

Who told you that gay couples could raise perfectly healthy children? Who told you that children could become well-adjusted with only one parent?

Trace it back to its source. Think about it. I think you fell hard for the Western mainstream media propaganda.

I follow all those media so I know that this narrative is all over the place.

Not so long ago, I woke up to an article of the New York times showing a female-to-male transsexual breastfeeding a baby with a caption along those lines: "So cute!".

It legitimately made me want to throw up. This was a natural reaction, not a reaction caused by my unconscious stereotypes.

Stereotypes exist for a reason. People usually don't like them because there is a lot of truth to them.

Stereotypes do hold some truth in their core, but you can't live your life basing it on them.

Moving on, there is no such thing as perfection. Noone and nothing is perfect in this world.
Yes, I strongly believe a same-sex couple is able to raise happy, healthy kids, as is a single mother, a single father, a grandmother, an aunt.
It's actually people like you perpetuating this f-ing stereotype that a two-parent heterosexual family is the best, who keep doing harm in our society.
Mind you, I ain't ideologically driven in any kind of form or shape.

 

[Christian Miller]

You are, what you're saying above is not your idea. And that idea is not supported by an ounce of scientific research.

No one is perfect in this world, but deliberately cutting a child from having a father or worse a mother certainly isn't a step towards perfection.

If you go through the scientific literature on the subject, and if you think about it a little, you'll realize that having two parents in indispensable for a child to have the best chance to become a balanced individual.

Sure, single or substitute parents can do their best, but it's quite clear that even their best won't be enough, especially when you're competing with healthy balanced family.

The kid will never have the same chances, and there are teachings and behavioral patterns that you can only learn from the mother or the father.

I think you only want to believe this narrative because it feels good, in a "everything is possible" kind of way, you'd like to think that we all have the same chances. We don't.

Looks, IQ, education, having both parents, mental well-being (50% of it is genetically determined), height (for a man), etc.

If you don't believe that all those matter to an extent (and some of them a lot) when it comes to personal success in life, you're deluding yourself.

What?
Stick to one topic, please.

What scientific literature?
You are so conservative in mind and stereotype-driven that no matter how much evidence that negates your bullshit is there, your bullshit would still be your dogma.

Jeff Bezos is bald, ugly, short and grew up in a family with a Cuban stepfather and a very young mother who was stigmatized by the society for getting pregnant out of wedlock. Yet, he is the second richest person in the world, has a good-looking wife and a lovely family.
On the contrary, you, who grew up in this potentially perfect two-parent heterosexual family, barely make ends meet.

 

[yetti]

What?
Stick to one topic, please.

What scientific literature?
You are so conservative in mind and stereotype-driven that no matter how much evidence that negates your bullshit is there, your bullshit would still be your dogma.

Jeff Bezos is bald, ugly, short and grew up in a family with a Cuban stepfather and a very young mother who was stigmatized by the society for getting pregnant out of wedlock. Yet, he is the second richest person in the world, has a good-looking wife and a lovely family.
On the contrary, you, who grew up in this potentially perfect two-parent heterosexual family, barely make ends meet.

In this very thread I posted a link to evidence of 100+ scientific articles that say otherwise. Of course he just dismissed it. OldnBald said it well here:

Why are you arguing with this one? We've all had this argument/conversation before n we all know where it usually ends.
The only good thing is in 20 years, even less, these old threads will look like a relic of ancient times (hell they nearly do now).

It's true. Gay marriage is now the law of the land, and in 20 years gay relationships, including families with children, will be so well established that arguing against them will look as silly as arguing against mixed marriage today. And in 20 years, many of the same people who today have... shall we say odd fixations with gay behavior will be happily, finally engaging in it themselves.

 

[Christian Miller]

You're going to use an example that can be explained almost exclusively by luck and having a creative personality.

You want to know about how many equally creative entrepreneurs have failed?

As with any productive human endeavor, the Pareto principle applies. More than 90% of them fail miserably.

Jeff Bezos, like people who make it as artists, got lucky, he was creative, so he came up with a new idea, and he was at the right place at the right time.

He was first. He started making a little money, then more, then more, until he became the behemoth that we know today.

A creative personality, luck and from what I've gathered, he's also very disagreeable and gives no fucks about other people's feelings:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/retail...-horrible-boss-and-is-that-good/#2c129e52645f

He beat the odds despite a relatively mediocre family situation. Of course humans can be the odds, some people win the lottery, which is more or less what happened to Jeff Bezos.

Personally, I'm not very creative, it's just not built into me, I don't have revolutionary ideas lying in my brain.

I'm someone who is introverted, who works hard, who needs to be in a collaborative environment (since I'm a very agreeable person) and inside a pre-determined hierarchy of competence. I wish it could be different but I'm never going to be able to alter my core personality.

So, now that we've established why I'm not like Jeff Bezos and why I will never become a billionaire entrepreneur, let's analyse my current financial situation:

You think I barely make ends meet? With what I have on my savings' account I must be roughly in the top 10% in my country. And yes, I'm 27, I've been living with my parents, and I'm going to move in in my girlfriend's apartment in a few months.

All I've done in my life, that fact that I got through some extremely rough patches (hair loss, depression, anxiety, psychiatry)... I can humbly say that I wouldn't have gotten through without the support of my parents, who stuck together no matter what.

Sure, I'm not a ruthless billionaire genius, but I do what I can with what I've been given. I sense a lot of bitterness in your post, do you want to believe that I'm doing horrible in life for some reason? I am not, not by any stretch of the imagination. Quite the contrary.

How are you doing in life? I'm curious.

I guess self-awareness ain't your cup of tea.
You are agreeable?
You diss on half the families out there, with shitty, stereotype-driven "arguments".
There is no such thing as agreeability in ya. Tut mir leid.

For all it matters, I'm a plastic surgery resident.
And have inherited some a good amount of money. Thank you, grandma!

 

[Christian Miller]

In this very thread I posted a link to evidence of 100+ scientific articles that say otherwise. Of course he just dismissed it. OldnBald said it well here:

Why are you arguing with this one? We've all had this argument/conversation before n we all know where it usually ends.
The only good thing is in 20 years, even less, these old threads will look like a relic of ancient times (hell they nearly do now).

It's true. Gay marriage is now the law of the land, and in 20 years gay relationships, including families with children, will be so well established that arguing against them will look as silly as arguing against mixed marriage today. And in 20 years, many of the same people who today have... shall we say odd fixations with gay behavior will be happily, finally engaging in it themselves.

I know.
He had the nerve to ask me why I disliked him, though.
Couldn't resist.
Lol