Is Male Pattern Baldness Rare @ The Population

[shookwun]

Having a child isn't any achievement at all.

It can be for certain individuals. but I would say on average all the wrong people are having more children then the successful ones.


A milestone in there life, after fulfilling all there own through education, career and personal investment they are now bringing someone else into this world.

Unfortunately it's usually the wrong people having to many.

\
\Just take a look outside, it's usually the poor ones, people on benefits that are having to many children while the people that should be conceiving are not having enough.

 

[SmoothSailing]

Don't try to live your life based on exceptions.

Yes I agree. But I'd also say "don't try to live your live based on what's considered normal".

In other words, if you don't want to have kids don't have them just because most people do. It's ok to be an outlier.

So if you're going bald but you look in the mirror and you look like BH, then maybe you should just let it happen.

Sometimes I think I'm to pedantic. I agree that most people will regret not having kids, probably why most people have kids. I never encourage it though, there are far to many people already. Well just don't have more than 3.

And no one should be given money to have kids. The fact that the government is giving cash in hand, per each child, to parents who aren't even financially capable of looking after themselves, is ridiculous.

 

[shookwun]

I really need to watch the movie Idiocracy.

How often do you notice poor, and stupid people bearing to many children while high IQ, and high earners are having far to few. IQ is genetic, and it's feasible to expect that stupid people bring more stupid people in this world. Stacked with low income, education potential we are brought fourth with more poverty.

While I was at the airport in Munich, Germany I seen a Russian family that had 7 children, a bunch were 7-10 and they had a few teenagers around 13-15. It made me happy knowing that Caucasians outside of North America are still having children.



What I normally see are a Muslim Somalian family who have six kids on average living in some sh*t hole apartment on benefits.

 

[CopeForLife]

For a woman, no, never of course.

For a man these days? I believe it is.

Perhaps we should be more precise: making the mutual decision to have a child with a cute young educated woman in her mid-twenties is an achievement.

Being tricked to become a beta-provider by a desperate washed-up chav woman in her mid-30's is not.

To me this kind of MGTOW post is similar to the incels who bash women and say that they're not worth it.

The Fox and the Grapes.

I disagree.

If you are with a "cute young educated woman" you already won.

Least, not every male or female wants to have child basically. Your definition of achievement is only works when woman and man wanted a child in the beginning.

If one of them do not want it it isn't a failure neither achievement.

Ideal situations are when both partners want or don't want an offspring tho.

Not sure how it is related to MGTOW please do not tie me with that morons, for god sake. What next, slybaldguys?

 

[shookwun]

LOL. Having children isn't an 'achievement' you nutjob. There are a rising number of people these days who consider the act morally flawed, most of them very well educated. I've given you links to all the arguments on an earlier thread, but you refused to so much as look at them as usual. Personally, I've never wanted children. Ever. I'd like a loving wife and a yappy, little dog, but kiddies? No thank you. Once again, you're just arrogantly generalising from your own ignorant opinions. And it shows.

it's all individual, and subjective.

I would be happy with a wife, and a dog, but bringing a child in this world would be something I am open to.

 

[SmoothSailing]

There was a study done in iceland proving that intelligence is slowly becoming weaker in the gene pool.

https://www.amren.com/news/2017/01/...g-education-genes-rarer-says-icelandic-study/

Those who carried more “education genes” tended to have fewer children than others. This led the scientists to propose that the genes had become rarer in the population because, for all their qualifications, better educated people had contributed less than others to the Icelandic gene pool.

 

[CopeForLife]

it's all individual, and subjective.

I would be happy with a wife, and a dog, but bringing a child in this world would be something I am open to.

Agree on this.

Caesar What Is Caesar To God What Is God.

 

[SmoothSailing]

On that topic, I'm relieved BH finally got given the chop by the Admin. More and more of his threads were just descending into trolling exercises and humble bragging. I'm not convinced the guy was ever actually all that 'mentally ill' at all. Certainly not in retrospect. None of his stories seemed to add up. Also, does anyone know what happened to Tellersquill? Was he banned? Or did he just leave? He was of a similar mould to BH as well.

He seemed to want to hear us disputing his delusional thoughts. "Women dislike masculinity/dominance". I mean he's either very delusional, in which case I feel bad, or he's just trying to get people to say things he likes, in which case it's sad.

 

[SmoothSailing]

My parents say they tricked the population with this overpopulation propaganda in the 1970's and 1980's. "Stop having children, think about the planet!"

Now our governments are like "the population's getting old, we don't have enough young workers anymore... Oh we have solution! Let's important Muslims from war-torn countries en masse! At least they have a lot of children!"

It's not a conspiracy theory, the white population of my city is slowly getting replaced. Everywhere I go, I feel like a stranger in my own country.

Muslims always have as many children as they can.

Yes but they were right the first time.

 

[Dench57]

I really need to watch the movie Idiocracy.

not particularly great, good concept but it just ends up being as dumb as the people its satirizing

 

[shookwun]

The mass killings, bombings, war, terrorism in regions of Africa, and the middle east can be seen as population control. An indirect benefit.



this is typical. they breed like rats.

My parents say they tricked the population with this overpopulation propaganda in the 1970's and 1980's. "Stop having children, think about the planet!"

Now our governments are like "the population's getting old, we don't have enough young workers anymore... Oh we have solution! Let's important Muslims from war-torn countries en masse! At least they have a lot of children!"

It's not a conspiracy theory, the white population of my city is slowly getting replaced. Everywhere I go, I feel like a stranger in my own country.

Muslims always have as many children as they can.

 

[JohnsonDDG]

I recommend everyone read the book childfree.

Its about people who have kids and regret it.

The reasons are various from breaking up a happy relationship, to costing careers for women, to the cost of raising kids, to the health impacts, to having kids that do not visit them.

I recommend reading it and making a grown up and logical decision.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

How often do you notice poor, and stupid people bearing to many children while high IQ, and high earners are having far to few. IQ is genetic, and it's feasible to expect that stupid people bring more stupid people in this world. Stacked with low income, education potential we are brought fourth with more poverty.

While I was at the airport in Munich, Germany I seen a Russian family that had 7 children, a bunch were 7-10 and they had a few teenagers around 13-15. It made me happy knowing that Caucasians outside of North America are still having children.



What I normally see are a Muslim Somalian family who have six kids on average living in some sh*t hole apartment on benefits.

Women don't select for IQ.

They value looks, money, status, and on many occasions, religious affiliation.

 

[CopeForLife]

They have their priorities messed up.

We know that raising a family 'works', it's been done for thousands of years.

But we have no evidence that remaining childless while putting all your chips on your career and hobbies will make you happy and fulfilled in the long term. Quite the opposite in fact.

What a bullshit, Fred.

So you postulate that having a child a 100% path to happiness?

You're deluded.

These things are detached from each others.

People imagine their purposes/values in the life and that purposes can have earth and sky difference in their 20-s and 40-s.

One person wanted a conservative family in his 20-s, got a decent women, reproduced a few times. Looked back in his 40-s and sees nothing valuable – shitty middle job, mediocre children albeit he did everything for them.

Another person chose a career or other new generation excuse to not have a family (kidding) and in his 40-s he realised that he'd better have a family like a first person.

Both are unhappy in a result.

 

[JohnsonDDG]

Lol, your career. My career is a means to an end, it doesn't define my life or my happiness.

The cost? Lol too, look at all these poor uneducated jobless fucks popping kids like rabbits (or rats like shook said).

Daddy government takes good care of them!

Health impact? If you do a good job at raising them, the impact on your health will be positive.

My parents have suffered a lot from my own suffering, but come on, they're the ones who lacked vision here: "Maybe he will become bald in his teens but meh, what could possibly go wrong?! He'll be fine!"

All my other 'bad moments' were caused by the emotional abuse of my father. With children, you get what you put in.

Which brings me to my last point: ungrateful brats who end up neglecting their parents: I just don't see it in my family, my mother visits her parents every single week because they were incredibly good to her. My mother would do everything in her power (and actually already did) to prevent them from ending up in a retirement home.

Again there are exceptions, but if your kids end up neglecting you in your old age, you're most likely at fault.



Read the above.

In the UK childcare for a day is over £60 before the age of 5 (then it is free state education 9am to 3pm)

So if both parents are working that is £300 per week, £1,200 per month, and over £12,000 per year.

This is a hell of a lot of money to lose over four years.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Lol, your career. My career is a means to an end, it doesn't define my life or my happiness.

The cost? Lol too, look at all these poor uneducated jobless fucks popping kids like rabbits (or rats like shook said).

Daddy government takes good care of them!

Health impact? If you do a good job at raising them, the impact on your health will be positive.

My parents have suffered a lot from my own suffering, but come on, they're the ones who lacked vision here: "Maybe he will become bald in his teens but meh, what could possibly go wrong?! He'll be fine!"

All my other 'bad moments' were caused by the emotional abuse of my father. With children, you get what you put in.

Which brings me to my last point: ungrateful brats who end up neglecting their parents: I just don't see it in my family, my mother visits her parents every single week because they were incredibly good to her. My mother would do everything in her power (and actually already did) to prevent them from ending up in a retirement home.

Again there are exceptions, but if your kids end up neglecting you in your old age, you're most likely at fault.



Read the above.

When my father was dying in the hospital, it was my sister and I visiting him holding his hand, not the office furniture he sold throughout his career.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

I find it very shallow when people say they want meaning from their careers, particularly as most people don't have interesting jobs. If the typical person overachieves they might be an office manager, or a school principal, a software developer, or a good lawyer ... Who cares? There's no meaningful legacy there and if you're not doing that job somebody else will.

Unless you're Stanley Kubrick or a neurosurgeon or somebody like that your career is not that meaningful and you can easily be replaced, capitalism is not going to miss you.

 

[JohnsonDDG]

I find it very shallow when people say they want meaning from their careers, particularly as most people don't have interesting jobs. If the typical person overachieves they might be an office manager, or a school principal, a software developer, or a good lawyer ... Who cares? There's no meaningful legacy there and if you're not doing that job somebody else will.

Unless you're Stanley Kubrick or a neurosurgeon or somebody like that your career is not that meaningful and you can easily be replaced, capitalism is not going to miss you.

Have you ever worked on a checkout? Or in a factory?

You might not know how lucky you are in your job.

 

[JohnsonDDG]

It is either hair transplant or children!

Well its certainly a massive financial sacrifice so you have to really be willing to be the cost.

 

[sunchyme1]

My father has always refused to go on holiday, to social gatherings, to restaurants, he mostly stayed at home and became bitter and negative.

But at least he's always looked like he had hair.

Having hair = more guarantee to have a solid and lasting marriage than spending time with your wife apparently.

Funny, if he had removed his hair piece and had accompanied her on holiday, to restaurants, etc. Maybe they would be divorced today.

lol

what a fucked up way to live your life

incredibly sad and crazy in equal amounts

still if my dad wore a wig, id want him to stay at home too. f*** that sh*t. way too embarassing