Exactly. To understand any science, you have to carry your Official Scientists ClubTM membership card with you at all times. How could he make such a careless mistakeAre you a scientist? Are you part of the hairloss research? How the hell did you know if the science made sense or not? Actual scientists haven’t figured sh*t out, yet you can determine what makes sense or not.
I'm honestly surprised that a lot of you guys think this is a bust. I think we were all expecting to see that 5 year claim through pictures of a man going from Norwood 5 to 2 or something. View attachment 85202
I don't think the picture was taken at a different angle. The difference of surface area of the hair is too substantial in comparison to the end of his bald spot. If the picture was to be taken at a different angle and the subject really showed no regrowth, we shouldn't even be able to see his bald spot. I think for a 6 month result, it's pretty successful. Wasn't the 5 year claim also based on an 18 month result?
I'm honestly surprised that a lot of you guys think this is a bust. I think we were all expecting to see that 5 year claim through pictures of a man going from Norwood 5 to 2 or something. View attachment 85202
I don't think the picture was taken at a different angle. The difference of surface area of the hair is too substantial in comparison to the end of his bald spot. If the picture was to be taken at a different angle and the subject really showed no regrowth, we shouldn't even be able to see his bald spot. I think for a 6 month result, it's pretty successful. Wasn't the 5 year claim also based on an 18 month result?
absolutely. I was pointing out the male's result specifically because I believe that majority of the users here are definitely upset about it. Although I do understand where they're coming from. Would've been nice to see results on a younger patient on top of results for temporal recession.The woman's re-growth is even more impressive.
agreed.
I feel sad for the 10 years of nothing coming from follica. Choi will expose how amateurish and primitive is their approach.
Shiseido will be also totally unecessary and costly.
I have a great feeling for Choi.
The other one I wouldn't rule out is jak. But Choi will humillate them all and things are progressing at LIGHTSPEED at Chois lab and university.
In Japan, yes.Can they release a product without making a phase 3 trial ?
This is incredibly disheartening as a diffuse thinning male with retrograde alopecia. I was really hoping for this to be something special. Very, very sad.
The picture of the woman does show decent results, however. But let me say that again: the picture of the WOMAN.
I'm honestly surprised that a lot of you guys think this is a bust. I think we were all expecting to see that 5 year claim through pictures of a man going from Norwood 5 to 2 or something. View attachment 85202
I don't think the picture was taken at a different angle. The difference of surface area of the hair is too substantial in comparison to the end of his bald spot. If the picture was to be taken at a different angle and the subject really showed no regrowth, we shouldn't even be able to see his bald spot. I think for a 6 month result, it's pretty successful. Wasn't the 5 year claim also based on an 18 month result?
Follicept, adrean, prp, qr678,dermaroller, appleboost etc etcThe pain is real. Now throw this sh*t in the junk heap with Nigam, Dr Gho, and Histogen and however many countless other scams we've come across.
The female results are pitiful compared to the claimsMy question is, why would he try to deceive the males when the female results were real?