Putting Aside Cash For Unborn Child's Hair Plugs

[Dante92]

Seriously guys, chill out. We're all balding, we're all on the same boat.

Here, this is a meme representing me fighting my depression.

 

[hairblues]

LOL

This threads a f*****g mess...LOL wtf happened?

 

[CopeForLife]

LOL

This threads a f*****g mess...LOL wtf happened?

Two balding men didn't agree on an issue

 

[hairblues]

Two balding men didn't agree on an issue

That broke down into the equivalent of a slap-fight.

 

[hairblues]

When white tigers are born in the wild the Mothers kill them to protect the Pride.

A Mother's love.

I learnt that on 'Shahs of Sunset'--who says you can't learn pertinent facts on Reality TV.


(Seriously though my Mother is fantastic and would give me a Kidney--unfortunatly not all parents are like this.)

 

[blackg]

Don't fight with me because i don't remember actual medical data.
Few americans and british have fought with me like idiots on Time facebook page because they didn't wanted children and went into insane mode.

There is high risk of reproductive cancer in nulliparous women by the way.

Just small fact ...
not an argument point

Well said, mate.

 

[Saurabhaj]

Higher risk is not equal to a high risk.

I am gong to make a guess, you probably get into fights not for the actual facts about the cancer risk but your interpretation of it and how you use that interpretation in your debates with women who have decided to not have children.

which is understandable that they probably wind up telling you to f*** off or something like this

If someone is bold enough to live life with having no children,
that some one should have guts to stay unmarried then.

Even a smaller increase in cancer incidence due to any factor creates tsunami in medical literature that attracts attention world wide.
Thousands of docs then brains storm to find the relationship by throwing money in it.

 

[hairblues]

If someone is bold enough to live life with having no children,
that some one should have guts to stay unmarried then.

Even a smaller increase in cancer incidence due to any factor creates tsunami in medical literature that attracts attention world wide.
Thousands of docs then brains storm to find the relationship by throwing money in it.

What does marriage have to do with this discussion one way or another?

You are only person bringing up marriage and its kind of random.

Your point of having kids or not to have kids due to cancer risk--which is still minimal rise--is irrelevant to the weight of the decision.

If you think it is--that is your problem and its great news since you do not possess a uterus.

 

[Saurabhaj]

Imagined a typical Indian who intervenes into another women's Facebook Timeline and throwing "facts" here and there.

View attachment 59319

I do not enter other people's facebook timeline.
It was Time page.


People were showing off their brain skills telling how having a child is bad idea,takes a toll on standard of living on public page.

 

[Saurabhaj]

What does marriage have to do with this discussion one way or another?

You are only person bringing up marriage and its kind of random.

Your point of having kids or not to have kids due to cancer risk--which is still minimal rise--is irrelevant to the weight of the decision.

If you think it is--that is your problem and its great news since you do not possess a uterus.

Its a counter argument for the person who thinks having a kid is not beneficial.

 

[hairblues]

Its a counter argument for the person who thinks having a kid is not beneficial.

it's an extremely weak counter argument to use avoiding the possible small increase in risk for uterine cancer as the 'benefit' to having kids.

Your logic from other side;
its better not to have kids because no risk of dying by blood clots, preclyampsia, stroke, infection or even increasing risk of breast cancer...which all those risks go up from pregnancy and post pregnancy.

it's not really practical logic..I don't want to insult you but its kind of 'low brow' thinking/debating.


Besides did you not start this by saying 'this is not an argument just a small fact?"

now its a counter argument? okay LOL

 

[Saurabhaj]

it's an extremely weak counter argument to use avoiding the possible small increase in risk for uterine cancer as the 'benefit' to having kids.

Your logic from other side;
its better not to have kids because no risk of dying by blood clots, preclyampsia, stroke, infection or even increasing risk of breast cancer...which all those risks go up from pregnancy and post pregnancy.

it's not really practical logic..I don't want to insult you but its kind of 'low brow' thinking/debating.


Besides did you not start this by saying 'this is not an argument just a small fact?"

now its a counter argument? okay LOL

You are losing control.
I stated fact about reproductive cancer as a non argument point.I don't wanted to have debate over that point.
How can you have a debate over medical data with me.

And I used 'marriage' and that too in second reply as a counter argument for
those who think having kids are non beneficial.


Breast cancer risk do not increase after pregnancy according to shaws(book).
In fact,nulliparous women are more in danger zone for that.

 

[hairblues]

You are losing control.
.

I read this much and did not continue.

no one is losing control

if that is how you are reading what i wrote then I suggest you go to a psychiatrist to get evaluated for paranoia

 

[Saurabhaj]

I read this much and did not continue.

no one is losing control

if that is how you are reading what i wrote then I suggest you go to a psychiatrist to get evaluated for paranoia

Chill girl.
You are losing control means you were not getting what i said before.

 

[hairblues]

you went full retard.

No, you just feel stupid.

You threw in an irrelevant fact into an ongoing conversation that had no relevance to the discussion.

The conversation was about people making a decision to have kids or not. The decision to do so or not to do so.

No sane or rational person is making that decision to have children based on the small increase or decrease in a cancer risk they may or may not ever get. Or any health risk they may or may not have when having or not having children...NOT unless they are autistic OR retarded...or actually at high risk for something NOT an elevated risk...HUGE difference.

If they are, they need to be evaluated by a psychiatrist for hypochondria.

i am not out of control, I am not angry, we are not fighting...this is me just telling you like it is...you can take it as you wish..you seem pretty sensitive so I am sure you are going to take it that I am fighting with you...so be it LOL don't care.

 

[hairblues]

Chill girl.
You are losing control means you were not getting what i said before.

so funny you write I am 'full reatard' then go back and change it to this

You did this 2x and this time I was able to quote you first.

Lame.

 

[Saurabhaj]

No, you just feel stupid.

You threw in an irrelevant fact into an ongoing conversation that had no relevance to the discussion.

The conversation was about people making a decision to have kids or not. The decision to do so or not to do so.

No sane or rational person is making that decision to have children based on the small increase or decrease in a cancer risk they may or may not ever get. Or any health risk they may or may not have when having or not having children...NOT unless they are autistic OR retarded...or actually at high risk for something NOT an elevated risk...HUGE difference.

If they are, they need to be evaluated by a psychiatrist for hypochondria.

i am not out of control, I am not angry, we are not fighting...this is me just telling you like it is...you can take it as you wish..you seem pretty sensitive so I am sure you are going to take it that I am fighting with you...so be it LOL don't care.

This is enough.

Do you really think layman people like you who don't know a single f*** about medical knowledge will think whether being nulliparous is good for health or not.

Than just posting worldwide known scienctific data about known increased in reproductive cancer makes you go angry.

Stop acting wrong.
You are fighting with me on one fact.

If you do not want to put weightage on that medical data in your decision,go on.
But blaming me on this info is wrong.

This thread is not a personal one to one chat box.
Make that clear.

 

[Saurabhaj]

so funny you write I am 'full reatard' then go back and change it to this

You did this 2x and this time I was able to quote you first.

Lame.

I did not like doing that..so i removed it.
Whats wrong with that.
I have removed that post within 2 seconds.

 

[hairblues]

This is enough.

Do you really think layman people like you who don't know a single f*** about medical knowledge will think whether being nulliparous is good for health or not.

Than just posting worldwide known scienctific data about known increased in reproductive cancer makes you go angry.

Stop acting wrong.
You are fighting with me on one fact.

If you do not want put weightage on that medical data on your decision,go on.
But blaming me on this info is wrong.

This thread is not a personal one to one chat box.
Make that clear.

I am not angry dude

I just think you are really lame.

And your argument is lame,

your back pedaling your argument is lame

your writing insulting posts then deleting them 2X is lame,

your trolling for a fight is lame.

your arrogance and anger issues is really lame

I mean I can go on..but you are just too lame to be bothered.

Go get some anger management courses dude I think you need them.



PS and your English writing skills are REALLY lame. I can't understand half your last post.

 

[Stanx22]

I believe you, you are an exception, and I respect your choice. Seriously.

But people like you are extremely rare, if you choose not to have kids, you'd better be 100% sure because you're going to bitterly regret it if you were wrong.

And lol at your last argument. People always drop these strawmen "But gay adoption is great because some heterosexual couples are terrible towards their children!" and think it's a valuable argument.

In my family, we respect our grandparents and see them regularly, same for all my friends and my girlfriend with their family. Yep, you surround yourself with people who hold similar values to yours.

And yes, it also worries me that Muslims are reproducing like rabbits while we're like "Nooo, my dreams, me, me, me, children are annoying! Let me live my life free of any responsibility!"

I don't want Muslims taking over our civilization just because Westerners all have f*****g Peter Pan syndrome coupled with narcissism.

Well no one gives a sh*t. You guys in the "First world country" Don't reproduce because most of you are shallow pieces of sh*t. Your women all run after good looks nothing more, nothing but good looks. I live in a "Third world country" and there's nothing called Incels or redpill here, nothing like only the 8/10+ males get women and the rest of us remain virgins or stick to hookers. You think anyone would be interested in such shitty civilization ? The only interest people shows towards the "First world country" is MONEY, nothing more because no one gives a sh*t. And btw i live in a "Muslim" country and i won't reproduce like a rabbit because i don't want to bring anyone into this piece of sh*t called world. And we're a third world countries because we're ruled by sick c****, nothing else and btw stop invading us and killing us everyday and we won't be "uncivilized" anymore.