- Reaction score
- 8,249
Unfortunately, no. And I'm really sorry to say it, but he did something that proved to me that he's not reliable at all in that sense.
You are freaking me out dude.
Unfortunately, no. And I'm really sorry to say it, but he did something that proved to me that he's not reliable at all in that sense.
Ok, what was that?Unfortunately, no. And I'm really sorry to say it, but he did something that proved to me that he's not reliable at all in that sense.
France is supposed to as it is part of their French citizenship.that is the thing Europe does not seem to assimilate them.
Reading the bible alone is not enough. You have to read what the fathers/saints of the orthodox said about each part of the bible (they can explain it better since they have the holy spirit). Protestantism has no apostolic continuity and catholicism has divertedDon't underestimate me
I've read the whole Protestant Bible cover to cover. I know my sh*t
France is supposed to as it is part of their French citizenship.
UK is supposed to be multi-cultural and France is supposed to be French Culture (one culture, one people, one nation).
Obviously France failed big time
Honestly?
Because they are viewed as pussies where I grew up (sorry but true)
I was childish - I admit it.
I dislike comments when I disagree, it's as simple as that. I only hate when users go using them on a rampage just for the heck of it, as a user did to fred and as tellersqueal did to me.
Are you seriously at each other's throats out of some likes/dislikes?
what are you disliking me forAaand I don't see what it is.
Haha I don't give a f*** - I'm in Vietnam.You guys have way too many in percentage.
We have them spread out. There is not Syrian neighborhood or such. They are mixed in with other cultures spread out. They are also watched differently here.
Even though you lied to me, I will not give you any dislikes. I always liked you as Tellersquill but I like you better as Johnson. By the way,is that a reference to your greatest asset? You know that is really why you have so much success with women when you are average looking which by the way you are not according to some of the women here. Lets, be honest here now.I was childish - I admit it.
For anyone interested - dante disliked 4 of my posts in the space of an hour so I went and disliked 10 of his posts in quick succession.
It was childish of me to do so.
Dante and I will never see eye to eye and we probably will not ever get a long but I do apologise
My 0.2c on profiling. If a disproportionate amount of crime is commited by a person of a certain profile then people with this profile are likely to be discriminated against. There is logic to this but it's also wrong. Individuals should be treated individually. But when it comes to security this becomes harder.
So if 9 times out of 10 when you see a group of black men, dressed a certain way, in a certain part of town, driving a certain type of car, they are up to no good and likely armed, it's hard to give the benefit of doubt. As your own safety is at risk.
In Ireland if gypsies set up close to my town you will see every gate locked throughout the day. No benifit of doubt given, maybe they're nice people, it's just hard not to profile when safety is at play.
My mam is always shocked when I tell her my experiences with the police, is it wrong that they are more suspicous of a group of young males than an old woman?
I was going to suggest that it was the reason, and it actually was. I know you Dante!
I covered their faces as much as I could, no way they could be recognized.
It was supposed to be a little joke which meant no harm to anyone, her, me or this forum (wouldn't be true anymore since pornographic pictures hurt the ad system).
One girl was not covered it's true, but it was to show she was hot, so yeah, you're right, to prove a point.
But it was quickly taken down and again, no harm was done.
I didn't post it being like "look at that b**ch!". Just: "look, I dated that kind of girl." That's it.
No one was mocked or hurt in the process, except maybe @blackg who had to take his rationalizations even further.
I agree with you to an extent for sure.
But that is the part of the conversation that is missing..because you and I can agree by definition that is a 'bias'...it is 'discrimination' if its justified discrimination or bias--this is an important part of the conversation we have to have in USA...but there is this knee-jerk reaction to 'there is no racism'...but technically it is..even if its 'justified' from their perspective..its still 'racism' by definition...here is definition from dictionary (not saying you don't know it)
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
So there is this two different perspectives that go on..one from an innocent black person who has done no wrong being profiled based on the color of his skin IS by definition experiencing racism.
And from perspective of an otherwise innocent cop who believes he is doing his job based on 'common sense'
There has to be more dialogue between police and black community leaders from that perspective and acknowledgment.
Now add to this--some cops are already biased or hate black people before joining force for their own life experience. This is hopefully dying out over the next 10 to 20 years but who knows..
It is complex.
I think the profiling I was talking about should not be labeled racism as there's a huge difference between viewing a whole race as subhuman or discriminating against a whole race than to profiling. It's possible and entirely likely that many police profile blacks from certain areas but have black mates, whom likely come from a different class, dress differently etc. These guys don't neccesarily believe their own race as superior, so even under your defiition they are not racist.
In contrast a police officer who views all blacks as crinimals is truly racist and a much worse person in my mind.
www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/no-true-scotsman/I was going to suggest that it was the reason, and it actually was. I know you Dante!
I covered their faces as much as I could, no way they could be recognized.
It was supposed to be a little joke which meant no harm to anyone, her, me or this forum (wouldn't be true anymore since naked pictures hurt the ad system).
One girl was not covered it's true, but it was to show she was hot, so yeah, you're right, to prove a point.
But it was quickly taken down and again, no harm was done.
I didn't post it being like "look at that b**ch!". Just: "look, I dated that kind of girl." That's it.
No one was mocked or hurt in the process, except maybe @blackg who had to take his narrative even further.
"I can tell it's photoshopped!" Good times.
I'm okay looking - they rated me a 6.5 here. This is what I look like (I currently don't have the beard)Even though you lied to me, I will not give you any dislikes. I always liked you as Tellersquill but I like you better as Johnson. By the way,is that a reference to your greatest asset? You know that is really why you have so much success with women when you are average looking which by the way you are not according to some of the women here. Lets, be honest here now.
I look back and think I looked so handsome - but I had no confidence back then. That picture of me with longish hair was when I was 19 and a virgin. I was scared of women and felt ugly. I wish I could have saved the old me and taught him to stop hating myself.Now I know why we have the same stats with girls.
And I know why you're so blue-pilled.
I just want to add you cant argue their is no racism in these killings then claim they are justified in their bias of these killings due to conditioning.