- Reaction score
- 8,249
I did it back when I was in Greece which is my natural habitat
still irrelevant to what i posted.
I did it back when I was in Greece which is my natural habitat
I'm not sure, it might be that he's the perfect stalker. I read a decent argument a while back but it escapes me, I'm sorry.wait @David_MPN what is the kernel of truth to the villain terminator? robot programmed to kill. i dont get it
Theres better stalkers *COUGH*I'm not sure, it might be that he's the perfect stalker. I read a decent argument a while back but it escapes me, I'm sorry.
To go back to the examples I used before, non-Japanese movies do very well in Japan.
No, non-Japanese movies do not do well at all in Japan, unless you're talking about specifically Hollywood. Which does well everywhere. Believe me in Japan you aren't going to find the latest French, Spanish, Russian, whatever films at your local cinema with any frequency. And again Japanese don't speak foreign languages fluently nor do they know much about the world, as they are isolated and rich and don't need to, like Americans.
No, non-Japanese movies do not do well at all in Japan, unless you're talking about specifically Hollywood. Which does well everywhere. Believe me in Japan you aren't going to find the latest French, Spanish, Russian, whatever films at your local cinema with any frequency. And again Japanese don't speak foreign languages fluently nor do they know much about the world, as they are isolated and rich and don't need to, like Americans.
@yetti
The way I phrased my post was lacking precision and is thus unfair in paintbrushing Americans rather than too many Americans , etc. I think it's kind of obvious, but perhaps it's not as it's the internet and sometimes people are riled up due to hostilities.
There are plenty of worldly people in the USA. However I still maintain that the median level of worldliness is low enough to be detrimental to social health, and also lower than most other countries.
It is the case that richer, more powerful countries don't need to be as worldly. China for example had a lot of internal legends that it was the center of the world back in the 16th, 17th, 18th centuries. For example they didn't allow the construction of embassies as they didn't recognize the existence of other countries. Another example is that Spain began its decline from superpower to non-power when it expelled the Jews and Muslims in the 15th century. So the USA is doing better than Imperial Spain and China lol. I think that strain of nationalism and provincialism is virtually always harmful. An openness and awareness of other cultures is beneficial, contributes to dynamism, provides an escape from the potential trap of bad ideas, and often works in surprising ways, for example the recent studies that people think more rationally when thinking in a second language. Other countries have had and some still have comparable levels of provincialism, it's not helpful.
I can promise you that I, personally, am not the person I would be if I had never left my Montreal Jewish bubble. I got some help as several members of my family had international interests, for example I remember pouring over photos of Italy after my aunt went to Rome when I was a pre-teen.
havent seen prestige but am now interested to
Please do. Amazing movie.
Beautiful weather in New York today.
One could classify Prestige, Inception, and Interstellar as a trilogy. They have a lot in common and there's a sequence between them. All three deal with issues of creativity, genius, and are metaphors for the filmmaking process.
I got accepted in NYU's MS program and may have to move there in August.
I feel as if every achievment is not worth it when you're gonna be repulsive and bald in a few years whats the pointMaybe we can hang out sometime. I was there for my third time today and would like to go again. My cousin and I went to the lower east side for a few hours, he says he likes the area as it's more authentic, it's less populated by hipsters, and chains like Zara's, H&M, and Apple. I have *a lot* more to see.
Congratulations on being accepted into an elite program in an elite subject. This is a great opportunity for you and I hope you get to meet some interesting people. You'll also be surrounded by beautiful women every day, not in the CS program (lol) but in New York City.
Congratulations on being accepted into an elite program in an elite subject. This is a great opportunity for you and I hope you get to meet some interesting people. You'll also be surrounded by beautiful women every day, not in the CS program (lol) but in New York City.
Maybe we can hang out sometime. I was there for my third time today and would like to go again. My cousin and I went to the lower east side for a few hours, he says he likes the area as it's more authentic, it's less populated by hipsters, and chains like Zara's, H&M, and Apple. I have *a lot* more to see.
Obviously geographic need and necessity help a lot. They go a long way and creative an incentive. However, so do non-inevitable cultural and education practices. People in Scandinavian countries, for example, routinely learn 3 or more languages, they don't need to learn 3, learning 2 would be enough. The education system does seem more rational in those countries, they also have healthier school lunches, and they don't have much homework until later ages. Those are social choices. Economic fundamentals remain but social factors and good policy making can still torque probabilities.Nice post, first two paragraphs appreciated. I most definitely agree that there are many real benefits to being "worldly", and that America would greatly, absolutely benefit if many of its people were much more so. I just think that it's not a knock on many Americans for not being worldly, it's a result of their location and circumstances and it won't change, and it's constant everywhere.
What I mean is this. As I said I have lived and worked all over the world, more than 20 years of travel and work all over Asia, Central Asia, Europe, the US. What I have found, and it is consistent everywhere, is that there are only two things that make a person, a town, a people worldly: financial need, or geographic proximity that makes it impossible to avoid. For example, some of the most fluent speakers of English as a second language I have ever met were living in the Central Asian steppe. These people had never been to a foreign country, non even seen an ocean. But mastery of English for them means a job at a western owned oil field as a translator or interpreter, and that means a salary maybe 10+ times what they'd normally earn. So they'd do everything they could do the learn the language, using Beatles cassette tapes, old Soviet textbooks, whatever. Financial need. Or take people in Eastern Europe twenty years ago, pre-internet and pre-ability to travel and work. Anyway, I found that they knew all about their neighbors. With so many occupations, invasions, and such close borders, how couldn't they! Poles, Czechs, Hungarians, Russians, Germans, they spoke authoritatively about each other, even if some of the stereotypes were skewed etc., they knew a lot. Proximity.
Watching foreign films with subtitles, or dubbed, still counts as watching foreign films. It's a piece of art from a culture separate from your own and thus there's a good shot that it will have different biases and different markers. Could a Japanese creative team create Batman? No, it's very American, similarly to how an American is unlikely to create Godzilla, as it's a metaphor for Hiroshima.Now take your average Joe or Masaki in Arkansas or outside any big city in Japan. Sure, Masaki will watch Batman, but he will likely not understand a single word of the movie. He'll listen to it translated into Japanese or read the subtitles, eat popcorn, and go back to his very Japanese life. He also likely doesn't know a single foreigner and may go for weeks without even seeing a non-Japanese.
I feel as if every achievment is not worth it when you're gonna be repulsive and bald in a few years whats the point