HughJass
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 3
Re: We killed Bin Laden! f*ck your Jihad! Hoorah Seals!!!!!!!!!!
The argument I am making is not even concerned with examining the morality/immorality of terrorist attacks. You can debate that subject if you want, I don't want to because I consider the ethics of terrorist attacks against civilians to be such a no-brainer that it doesn't even require debate.
The argument I am making is one which examines the things which motivate terrorists and how they get support amongst various populations which is crucial to know if the goal is to isolate and ultimately defeat them.
A completely dishonest representation of what I've been saying.
Anyone can throw out inflammatory accusations in order to try and capture the moral high ground. Unless you back them up with evidence -as you've obviously failed to do in the above post- then they are nothing but personal attacks.
finfighter said:Wow, do you notice a trend? The terrorist attacks are never the fault of the radical Muslims in aussies view[/b][/color], he always justifies their actions! What a sicko! I will not debate with people with these types of character flaws, I wouldn't have debated with a Nazi sympathizer during WWII either!
The argument I am making is not even concerned with examining the morality/immorality of terrorist attacks. You can debate that subject if you want, I don't want to because I consider the ethics of terrorist attacks against civilians to be such a no-brainer that it doesn't even require debate.
The argument I am making is one which examines the things which motivate terrorists and how they get support amongst various populations which is crucial to know if the goal is to isolate and ultimately defeat them.
optimus prime said:I have to agree with FinFighter. There is having a debate with someone, and then there is arguing with someone who will no matter what not accept that the radical Muslims have to accept responsibility for their actions in this society like the rest of us.
A completely dishonest representation of what I've been saying.
Anyone can throw out inflammatory accusations in order to try and capture the moral high ground. Unless you back them up with evidence -as you've obviously failed to do in the above post- then they are nothing but personal attacks.