- Reaction score
- 142
Insane news, wow.
These guys came out of nowhere.
These guys came out of nowhere.
In the high-dose (5 mg/ml) clinical study, AR68 was given once per week for 24 weeks and showed 83% efficacy in increasing hair counts compared with finasteride. No side effects were observed. Therefore, SAMiRNA targeting AR mRNA is a potential novel topical treatment for Androgenetic Alopecia.I don’t know what is the hype behind this product? Can someone explain to me?
Let's not do this again please. Nobody knows okay. It's been never done. Your best answer is 'it could'.If you combine it with finasteride can we expect some regrowth? I know nobody knows for sure, just speculating
It’s not minimal it’s as effective at 24 weeks as finasteride is at 48Someone needs to look further into the science/patent behind this before anyone gets excited at all. The gains were minimal (granted if they held would be nice) and there is a good chance that this is a snake-oil type product that decided to use RNA as a buzzword judging by the lack of trials needed to commercialize.
It’s also peer reviewed, double blind and published in a legitimate journalSomeone needs to look further into the science/patent behind this before anyone gets excited at all. The gains were minimal (granted if they held would be nice) and there is a good chance that this is a snake-oil type product that decided to use RNA as a buzzword judging by the lack of trials needed to commercialize.
The product packaging also looks incredibly suspect for an intended medical product. Why would they need premium looking packaging if not to market a dud product?
Fair point, but I'll believe it when I see it. Other then the journal (which of course is a big factor of legitimacy) this has all the makings of a scam.It’s also peer reviewed, double blind and published in a legitimate journal
I don’t disagree with the container looking weird, it’s a bold choice. I hope it works, or pyri, which I hope works since we’re about to get the shipment soonFair point, but I'll believe it when I see it. Other then the journal (which of course is a big factor of legitimacy) this has all the makings of a scam.
I feel like you're just picking out the buzz word here and thinking that it's some new dangerous frontier of science. These guys already demonstrated they can do a cosmetic approach by the manor of trial they used. They basically did a full phase 3 trial before any phase1/2.
My concern is that it will be pricey considering the whole "game changer" narrative and the fancy design would be another sign for that. My guess would be 100 - 200€ for a bottle that would last 1 month (for whole scalp coverage).Container being fancy is typical marketing, in the end it's still a cosmetic. Hell I've seen minoxidil in fancy packaging too.
Let's hope it actually gets to the market.
Indeed lolYou kind of change your opinion bro.
Wow it's almost like that's a healthy thing to do as you get more information. If you actually look at what I said, I still called it a buzz word there because I don't believe for a second they have a cosmetic mRNA process that triggers a response from the body. The packaging just sealed the opinion for me that it's a scam lotion.You kind of change your opinion bro.
Wow it's almost like that's a healthy thing to do as you get more information. If you actually look at what I said, I still called it a buzz word there because I don't believe for a second they have a cosmetic mRNA process that triggers a response from the body. The packaging just sealed the opinion for me that it's a scam lotion.
Imagine your mRNA covid booster shot came in a luxury perfume bottle. You'd be questioning why they went out of there way to do that as well.
I think it could be more like $50 - $100 NZD because numbers.My concern is that it will be pricey considering the whole "game changer" narrative and the fancy design would be another sign for that. My guess would be 100 - 200€ for a bottle that would last 1 month (for whole scalp coverage).
SM04554 is one.Are there any recent hair loss products that had promising results published in a prestigious science journal that later turned out to be duds?