HughJass
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 3
Re: We killed Bin Laden! f*ck your Jihad! Hoorah Seals!!!!!!!!!!
There's one little fly in the ointment of your theory that getting rid of all the bad people in the world can be justified, regardless of their guilt in specific crimes: massive amounts of civilians get killed in the process.
OK so when you're about to launch a very costly and bloody war or two in order to capture or kill the people who were apparently responsible for committing the crime you are launching the war in response to, it's not necessary to actually provide any evidence of their involvement. As long as they have committed some other crime somewhere along the line or spent time in the company of criminals then that is sufficient. Is this the argument you are making? If it is then This is a very strange concept of justice. I have to tell you, I don't see it catching on in legal circles.
And if we are going to apply this concept universally (I imagine you wouldn't accept that) then that would make pretty much every US government in recent history fair game for assassination when you consider the company they've been keeping:
hairrific said:You know if I woke up in the morning and found dirty RAT DROPPINGS on my counter top I would have the DNA tested so I could find AND KILL the exact RAT that sh*t on my counter top. I am just like you Aussie, I would ONLY want the exact RAT that did it not the ALL THE OTHER RATS in the house! Rats have rights too. But please, no need to post lots of PETA research documents Aussie.
There's one little fly in the ointment of your theory that getting rid of all the bad people in the world can be justified, regardless of their guilt in specific crimes: massive amounts of civilians get killed in the process.
The military has a hit list, in case of an attack where there is no proof of who did it or no smoking gun scenario. So if I was an terrorist organization or say Iran or north Korea for example I would be discouraging any attacks on the US so as not to have to take the punishment for something I did not do. Sort of like a mob scene where you don't know who threw the Molotov cocktails, so you arrest the whole mob. THIS IS TEXT BOOK STRATEGY. If your such a low life that you are hanging out with a mob that does that sort of thing, you know what, it serves you right if you get arrested or shot at. And stupid head Osama Bin Laden was just asking for it wasn't he.
OK so when you're about to launch a very costly and bloody war or two in order to capture or kill the people who were apparently responsible for committing the crime you are launching the war in response to, it's not necessary to actually provide any evidence of their involvement. As long as they have committed some other crime somewhere along the line or spent time in the company of criminals then that is sufficient. Is this the argument you are making? If it is then This is a very strange concept of justice. I have to tell you, I don't see it catching on in legal circles.
And if we are going to apply this concept universally (I imagine you wouldn't accept that) then that would make pretty much every US government in recent history fair game for assassination when you consider the company they've been keeping: